So We Have A Corrupt Political System Is Killing All The US Politicians The Answer ?

So We Have A Corrupt Political System Is Killing All The Democrats US Politicians... The Answer ? This Video Above Is A Frontline Democrat Party Lie, Politics And Democracy. All Lies Now And It Is Not True Today At All... Yes President Donald Trump’s Did Win The 2020 Election... We The American Peoples Our Not In A Democracy - We Our A Republic Period ! - So Read All The Text Below And You Must Watch This True Video's Below... Thank You ! - The Fix Is In Pedophile Joe Biden Win Election In 2024 100% Proof Voter Fraud In 2020 Election - https://rumble.com/v57l8uh-the-fix-is-in-pedophile-joe-biden-win-election-in-2024-100-proof-voter-frau.html

Show more

The Fix Is In Pedophile Joe Biden Win Election In 2024 100% Proof Voter Fraud In Election 2020-24 Democrats Still Say Trump Will Be Assassination Period ! Yes Its True (Unmasked) 100% Proof of Voter Fraud in USA 2020 Election In U.S.A. Yes On July 18, 2024, Former President Donald Trump Accepted The Republican Party’s Nomination For President At The Republican National Convention (RNC) In Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

So This November 2024 General Election Will Be J.D. Vance Vs. Kamala D. Harris... So After Trump Win Nomination... Democrats Hold A Secret Meeting Last Night At Midnight (Trump Is Dead & Biden Will Step Down) And Yes 100s Others Democrats Now Said Today July 19-2024... https://today.yougov.com/ratings/politics/popularity/Democrats/all - Yes Former President Donald Trump Must Be Killed Now (So Lets Try "Again & Again & Again)" We Will Stop Trump At All Cost That It Period. 100s Democrats Again Said Yes... Kill Him. As The People Democrats Party U.S.A. We Must Save The Nation At All Cost At This Midnight Meeting.

In light of recent events, the Democratic Party has reaffirmed its dedication to safeguarding the United States at all costs. This commitment is reflected in its 2024 platform, which emphasizes the importance of unity, resilience, and effective governance.

Addressing the Threat of Trumpism
The platform explicitly acknowledges the ongoing threat posed by Trumpism, recognizing that the former president’s divisive rhetoric and policies have weakened the nation’s institutions and social fabric. Democrats are committed to countering this toxic ideology with a vision of inclusivity, equality, and democratic values.

Strengthening Democratic Institutions
To achieve this goal, the party is focused on rebuilding and strengthening its own institutions, including the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and state parties. This effort aims to create a robust grassroots network, capable of mobilizing voters and promoting a positive agenda.

Protecting American Democracy
The platform also emphasizes the need to protect and defend American democracy, including the integrity of elections, the independence of the judiciary, and the freedom of the press. Democrats recognize that these institutions are essential to the nation’s well-being and are committed to preserving them from erosion or attack.

Leadership and Unity
In the face of adversity, Democrats are rallying behind their presidential nominee, Joe Biden, who has demonstrated his commitment to the party’s values and principles. Many party leaders and rising stars have publicly endorsed Biden, citing his record, principles, and 2020 victory against Trump.

Coalition Building
The party is also working to build a broad coalition of supporters, including minority communities, labor unions, and progressive organizations. This effort aims to create a united front against Trumpism and promote a shared vision for the nation’s future.

Conclusion
In summary, the Democratic Party is committed to saving the nation at all costs by: Democrats Paid For Assassination Attempt Against Donald Trump Failed So Sad ? - https://rumble.com/v56wbh9-democrats-paid-for-assassination-attempt-against-donald-trump-failed-so-sad.html

Democrats Party Secret Service Wait 42 Seconds Fire On President Trump's Assassin - https://rumble.com/v570hi1-democrats-party-secret-service-wait-42-seconds-fire-on-president-trumps-ass.html

Countering Trumpism with a positive vision of inclusivity and democratic values.
Strengthening its own institutions and grassroots network.
Protecting American democracy and its institutions.
Rallying behind Vice President Kamala D. Harris... and building a broad coalition of supporters.
By pursuing these goals, Democrats aim to restore the nation’s unity, promote the common good, and ensure a brighter future for all true Americans.

Yes The Fix Is In & Why Did The Democrats Party Order Secret Service To Stand Down And Wait 42 Seconds To Fire On President Trump's Assassin And Why Did Democrats Paid For Assassin After They'd Been Alerted A Man On A Roof With A Rifle ? Yes The New World Order Is Diving Into The Unanswered Questions Around The Democrats Party Paid For And Order The Attempt On Trump's Life. No Question Its A Inside Job By CIA, FBI, NSA, SS, Must Be Investigated. Only 150 yards away on a platform where he could be seen, people yelling to policeman that there's a guy on the roof with a gun. No brainer!

https://today.yougov.com/ratings/politics/popularity/Democrats/all

The notion that a corrupt political system is “killing” all US politicians is an oversimplification of a multifaceted issue. While corruption undoubtedly exists in the US political system, it is not a singular cause of death for politicians.

Political Violence: A Growing Concern
Recent events, such as the January 6th insurrection and increasing political polarization, have led to a rise in political violence. According to Reuters, political violence in the US has reached its worst levels since the 1970s, with at least 39 people killed and many more injured. This violence is often aimed at individuals, including politicians, activists, and bystanders, rather than solely targeting property.

Corruption: A Broader Issue
Corruption is a pervasive problem in many societies, including the US. It can manifest in various forms, such as bribery, embezzlement, or abuse of power. However, it is essential to recognize that corruption is often a symptom of deeper societal issues, including:

Polarization: The increasing divide between political ideologies and the erosion of trust in institutions.

Incompetence: Failures in governance and leadership, which can create an environment conducive to corruption.

Ideology: The influence of extreme political beliefs, which can lead to violence and harm.

Assassination as a Solution
The idea of eliminating corrupt politicians through assassination is problematic and unlikely to achieve its intended goals. As experts have noted, assassination:

Deprives the targeted politician of due process: It denies them the opportunity to clear their name and address allegations.

Fails to address systemic corruption: It does not address the broader societal issues that contribute to corruption.

Can have unintended consequences: It may strengthen support for the politician’s cause, create martyrs, or even lead to a power vacuum.

In conclusion, while corruption is a serious issue in the US political system, it is not a singular cause of death for politicians. Political violence, polarization, incompetence, and ideology are all interconnected factors that contribute to the complex problem. Assassination is not a viable solution, as it fails to address the root causes of corruption and can have unintended and harmful consequences.

Basically because your idea (assassination of corrupt politician) undermines rather than reinforces the rule of law. Usually the definition of corruption includes some kind of illegal activity. Otherwise it's just stuff you don't like for personal moral reasons. And if everyone started to use assassination to solve their moral differences... the basis of the (modern) state as the sole authority for violence would cease to exist.

5 Reasons the Two-Party System is Bad for America. A few years back, various versions of the meme above began circulating on the internet. Most meme creators attribute the expression to one Native American tribe or another, and it has been used by people on the Right and the Left in different contexts as they attempt to push one agenda or another. Some positioned it as a call to unity, while most others used it to highlight how our binary, two-party system (and the money behind it) is the root of all evil.

According to a story published in the Washington Post, the true origin of this quote is none other than Pat Buchanan, right-wing pundit and former aid to both Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon. It was the basis for a speech launching his run as a Reform Party candidate in 1999.

I agree with very little that Mr. Buchanan has said over the years, but he was right when he stated that our current two-party system is rife with dark money and corruption.

Regardless of the origin of the words, the frustration behind them is real.

Our current American political ecosystem - echo chamber - is destroying our country while giving us the illusion that we have a say in who runs it. Or, as demonstrated in a 2004South Park episode, each election is like having a choice between a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich. (This sentiment would become especially popular during the 2016 presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.)

We don't have a viable range of choices, at least as things stand now, and it's been that way practically since the dawn of the United States.

The Origins of Binary Politics in America
Once upon a time, a group of progressive thinkers and political influencers of their time set out to launch a grand experiment called Democracy. They formed the United States of America on the premise that all men are created equal (and many other things that looked good on paper but didn't quite pan out in reality).

The sentiment only really applied to people who looked like them. But it was a nice thought; many have fought and died to preserve that ideal over the past 246.5 years.

The reality is that two parties have dominated our country since the first election. Although the names and affiliations have changed over the years, the dynamic has not.

For example, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans were the first two main parties in American politics. Two other parties, the Whigs and the Know-Nothings, also achieved dominance at various points, but never to the level of the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans and later iterations of the Big Two that have evolved into the duopoly that we have today.

Platforms and ideologies have changed hands, shifted, evolved, and risen or fallen in importance over the years. Still, the main political divide between two major parties and the people on either side who support them has always boiled down to matters of a state's right to decide its fate versus a strong central government, how things should be paid for, and by whom.

For example, the first significant political divide of this nature came in the 1820s when Congress became divided about the federal government's role moving forward. This question essentially broke the Democratic and Republicans into two parties. These were the National Republicans, who thought that widespread infrastructure improvements like roads and bridges would be funded and planned at a national level, and the Old Republicans, that believed in limited federal powers and a preference for state-level authority.

These parties dissolved and evolved into the Democrats and Whigs after the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828. When the Whig party dissolved over the issue of slavery in the 1840s, that party was replaced by the Republicans.

While the parties' names and platforms have changed over the years, the core question of state-centric or federal control has always been at the heart of the divide.

With a few notable exceptions over the years, each candidate is some version of Douche or Turd, and the lesser of two evils is the best we can do. Third-party candidates have little real chance.

That's what they want you to think, anyway.

Some 209 state-level parties are registered in the United States, many of which you have never heard of. There are also many independents trying to get on the ballot across the country each election cycle, the most notable of which was Ross Perot in 1992 and Bernie Sanders in 2016.

They weren't the first third-party challengers, either. Hopefully, they won't be the last.

A Brief History of Major Third-Party Challengers in US Presidential Politics
Abraham Lincoln: Few people realize that the Republican Party began as a third-party challenge to the status quo, replacing the Whigs. He won the 18609presidential race with 50% of the electoral vote.

The fact that their first major national candidate won the presidency demonstrates that it can be done. In modern elections, this can happen if the playing field is leveled, candidates address issues that matter to voters in a meaningful way, and money ceases to matter in politics.

Theodore Roosevelt: In the early 1900s, former Republican president Teddy Roosevelt created the Bull Moose Party, aka the Progressive Party. This was the first true third-party challenge that didn't result from one of the two significant parries dissolving or breaking into two factions.

This run resulted in a substantial 27% of the electoral vote and second place against Democrat Woodrow Wilson. The fact that Roosevelt was a popular former president was one factor. Still, it could be said that the progressive platform that favored Women's Suffrage, worker's rights, and direct election of senators made him a truly popular populist and paved the way for other Progressive movements.

George Wallace: This holdout of the Old South launched two unsuccessful presidential bids. His runs primarily responded to the Civil Rights movement and the Democrat Party's shift away from their historical representation of working-class white Americans.

His first bid in 1968 was as the candidate representing the American Independent Party, where he won five southern states deep in the heart of Dixie. During the presidential election of 1972, Wallace won 45 Electoral College votes on election day as the American Party candidate.

Ross Perot: The first third-party severe challenge since Lincoln won the presidency more than 130 years before, Ross Perot was a self-funded independent who ran on a platform of fiscal conservatism and reigning in the budget deficit.

He met the criteria for participation in the presidential debates and received 20% of the vote during the elections. His strong showing leads the duopoly to raise the bar for debate and signature requirements to get on the national ballot.

Gary Johnson is a former Republican who left the party to run for President as a Libertarian candidate in 2012 and 2016. His 2012 bid netted him just over 3% of the national vote, the best showing for any Libertarian candidate before or since.

Bernie Sanders: An independent from Vermont, America's Grandpa initiated the first real third-party challenge since Ross Perot. He initially ran as a Democratic Socialist in 2016. He then temporarily switched to the Democrat Party for his run in the 2020 elections, partly to criticisms that he peeled off voters from Hillary Clinton and threw the presidency to Trump.

During the 2016 race, he received 39% of the roll call vote during the DNC primaries. Still, he withdrew from the race to pledge support to Clinton, allegedly after gaining concessions to pull the party further left and address critical issues like climate change, PAC money, voter and healthcare access, and education reform.

Donald Trump: Although Trump wasn't technically a third-party candidate, his campaign did attract a lot of disaffected independent voters who resonated with his message of "draining the swamp." There's also a possibility that Trump will try to transition his 2024 presidential bid to a new third party or attempt to run independently.

These third-party challengers and the occasional independent candidate span over 150 years of our nation's history and run along all political spectrum points. So, what did these "disruptors," "agitators," and "spoilers" have in common?

Well, they speak to:

Voter frustration

Populism

Anti-government or corporate sentiment

Independent, anti-establishment appeal

In other words, they were dangerous to the status quo somehow.

Read on to learn why that's a good thing when it's authentic, organic, and devoid of performative populism.

5 Good Reasons That Two-Party Politics is Bad for America

Most third parties don't make it, and the reasons our current system is bad for America are not mutually exclusive. They're closely linked.

But you don't have to take my word for it. I always bring receipts.

1. Two-Party Politics Limits Our Options
This leads to the infamous "lesser of two evils" dynamic that encourages voter disinterest and low turnout. When faced with two often unpopular choices, people just drop out. This means that the interests of the many are often shaped by representatives chosen by as little as 20% of the expectorate.

2. Duopolies Promote Stagnation
Although this has always been true to some degree, American politics over the last 40 years have devolved into one party opposing the other at every level. This has led to unprecedented gridlock and national priorities being out on the back burner in favor of performative governance with no progress.

3. Two-Party Political Systems are Polarizing
It is adhering to a binary system that often encourages ideological factionist results in polarization. The parties have always been split o matters of economics, social issues, and the degree of government reach.

Because the parties are so polarized and focused on winning elections, they are often willing to adopt extreme positions to appeal to their base. This can lead to a lack of compromise and cooperation in government, as each party becomes more focused on defeating the other than on working together to solve problems.

But, the polarization has reached the point where the citizenry and the people elected to represent them are more interested in scoring against the "other" rather than supporting policies that benefit the national interest. Many of us can only agree on what the national interest is.

4. Two-Party Hegemony Encourages Corruption
Our political candidates spend more time raising money and campaigning for the next election than they do govern. Monied interests from the military to corporate America take advantage of the excessive money needed to fund the average campaign by pledging cash for favorable legislation.

Due to the enormous costs of running for political office, politicians often rely on donations from wealthy individuals and corporations to fund their campaigns. This can lead to a situation where politicians are more responsive to their donors' needs than the general public's needs. This can be particularly problematic regarding issues such as campaign finance reform, healthcare, and environmental protection.

This leads to laws that favor wealthy donors and the incumbent candidate, keep the dark money flowing, and promote governance that supports further corruption to the detriment of the people.

5. Two-Party Systems Unfairly Disadvantage Minority Viewpoints
When there are only two viable options and other voices are silenced, it leads to compromise that unfairly hurts marginalized and disadvantaged people. Creating a binary system forces people to choose between two parties that may not align with their beliefs or values, and it often excludes the voices of those most affected by political decisions.

Two-Party vs. Multi-Party Political Systems: What's the Difference?
Despite talks about being a one-person, one-vote democracy, the US is a representative republic. The two main establishment political parties, Democrats and Republicans, are the only political parties in the United States that are recognized with ballot access in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. They also account for 102 out of the 209 state-level parties.

In addition to the two established parties, we have three minor political parties that sometimes achieve national significance or recognition. These are the Libertarian Party, Green Party, and Constitution Party, which have ballot access in 33, 17, and 12 states, respectively.

However, the way debate guidelines and other criteria are created, and the goalposts keep getting moved whenever a viable third-party challenge does arise, the two main political parties will continue to pass power between them until we say "Enough!" and refuse to play.

What We Can do to Break the Hegemony
Since many among the American electorate have memories or knowledge of politics that doesn't extend beyond the past ten years, one need only look at the 2016 presidential campaigns of Clinton, Trump, and Sanders for a demonstration of why a multi-party political system is necessary to save American democracy and how hard the establishment will fight to stop a viable third party candidate.

That election cycle was also a masterclass in how candidates like Trump use populism to ignite an overlooked electorate.

One possible solution is to transition from a "winner take all" orfirst past post-electoral system and replace it with ranked-choice voting.

With ranked choice, voters rank the candidates in order of preference rather than simply casting a ballot for one candidate or another. This system is used in two states, Alaska and Maine, but several others allow ranked-choice voting during primaries.

Lastly, the outdated Electoral College must be abandoned in favor of a popular vote. Despite arguments, more is needed to remove the voice of smaller, less populated states.

FAQ About Two-Party Political Systems
Q: When did the two-party system start in the US?

A: Although there have been representatives of one of the two major parties at any given time since the first presidential election in the United States, the two-party hegemony that evolved through to today began to take shape between 1824 - 1840.

Two things happened around this time. First, the average person began to become more engaged in politics. This accelerated as the dust settled from the nation's birth and norms became established.

The second instigating factor was a chasm between those who saw the need for a strong central government and those who believed fervently in states' rights and a limit to federal powers.

Using rhetoric and any other means of persuasion, these two camps were also able to effectively divide the masses on a range of issues that defined their platforms.

Q: What do two-party and multi-party systems mean?

A: Two-party political systems, also known as duopolies or binary political systems, are political dynamics that place the power into the hands of two increasingly similar political parties. To protect this system, viable options outside these two parties are limited in reach and influence through various rules and regulations.

Multi-party systems are any form of democratic government that has more than two parties. Technically, there can be an infinite number of parties, but five is the most common and workable.

Under multi-party, there are enough challenges to keep all parties in check and prevent the dominance of any one party or ideology. The party that gains the majority during national and regional elections sets the agenda. Still, coalitions and alliances are formed among major and minor political parties to govern or pass legislation.

One drawback of multiparty systems is a need for transparent governance if a consensus can't be reached. This often results in stagnation, party turnover, and frequent elections, as was most recently seen in the UK.

Q: What are the three main features of a two-party system?

A: In a two-party system, such as we have in American politics, three main characteristics are present:

Legislative/ideological dominance that transitions between two main parties, one in power and one in opposition

Shifting rule changes that favor the two dominant parties and prevent any realistic third-party challenges

The opposition party acts as a check on the party in power

Final Thoughts
As you can see, America's current two-party political system only benefits a handful of politicians and their corporate masters. If we truly want a government that reflects and represents "We the People," then elections need to become open and based upon platforms and proposals that benefit all of us and improve our country.

That means:

Taking money out of politics

Rolling back outdated, self-serving rules and requirements that shut out viable challengers

Educating voters about candidates and issues

Improving voter access

These are only a few suggestions.

It isn't enough to voice disenchantment with business-as-usual politics, false equivalencies, and the illusion of choice. We must follow up with action by supporting independent presidential candidates during every election cycle and at all levels of government.

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians? Basically because your idea (assassination of corrupt politician) undermines rather than reinforces the rule of law. Usually the definition of corruption includes some kind of illegal activity. Otherwise it's just stuff you don't like for personal moral reasons. And if everyone started to use assasination to solve their moral differences... the basis of the (modern) state as the sole authority for violence would cease to exist.

And given that it's apparently a fairly popular idea, in some movies at least, here's some similar commentary on the idea:

The violence could worsen the problem of corruption,” says Michael Johnston, a political scientist and professor at Colgate University. “It would legitimate violent action from the persecuted politicians, and encourage a hunt for the suspects. That is what will happen with Rodrigo Duterte’s tactics in the Philippines,” he explains, referring to the Philippine president who wishes to distribute 42 thousand weapons to ordinary citizens, especially community leaders, so they can go around the country killing people involved with any form of illicit activities, especially drug trafficking.

In such a scenario, a climate similar to that of Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union would be implemented: any accusation, no matter how little justified by concrete evidence, would mean a death penalty or exile. And the dead corrupt politicians would quickly be replaced by other ones – as it already happens with members of the organized crime.

And since that part doesn't get developed with any examples there, South Africa is perhaps an example where the whistleblowers are the ones that usually end up assassinated, nowadays.

Political assassinations are rising sharply in South Africa, threatening the stability of hard-hit parts of the country and imperiling Mr. Mandela’s dream of a unified, democratic nation.

But unlike much of the political violence that upended the country in the 1990s, the recent killings are not being driven by vicious battles between rival political parties.

Quite the opposite: In most cases, A.N.C. officials are killing one another, hiring professional hit men to eliminate fellow party members in an all-or-nothing fight over money, turf and power, A.N.C. officials say. [...]

The recent assassinations cover a wide range of personal and political feuds. Some victims were A.N.C. officials who became targets after exposing or denouncing corruption within the party. Others fell in internal battles for lucrative posts.

Encouraging assassination as a legitimate political tool can easily lead to that since who has more money to pay hitmen?

And to reinforce this idea, going back to Duterte, here's a quote from him:

Rodrigo Duterte has warned journalists in the Philippines that they are legitimate targets for assassination if they do wrong, in the President-elect’s latest controversial comments ahead of being sworn into office later this month.

Duterte was asked during a press conference Tuesday how he would address the country’s high murder rate for journalists, reports Agence France-Presse. “Just because you’re a journalist you are not exempted from assassination, if you’re a son of a bitch,” he replied.

Interestingly, Duterte was apparently referring to (or perhaps reducing the problem to) the rather complex case of Jun Pala, who apparently himself was linked to a vigilante group that exposed and allegedly assassinated some [corrupt] politicians.

And since this came up several times in the comments, here's a definition(s) primer:

“Corruption” is a term whose meaning shifts with the speaker. It can describe the corruption of the young from watching violence on television or refer to political decisions that provide narrow benefits to one’s constituents in the form, say, of a new road through the district. In short, speakers use the term to cover a range of actions that they find undesirable. Because my topic includes both corruption and poor governance, I omit both morally corrupting activities, on the one hand, and run-of-the-mill constituency-based politics, on the other. I use the common definition of corruption as the “misuse of public power for private or political gain,” recognizing that “misuse” must be defined in terms of some standard. Many corrupt activities under this definition are illegal in most countries—for example, paying and receiving bribes, fraud, embezzlement, self-dealing, conflicts of interest, and providing a quid pro quo in return for campaign gifts. However, part of the policy debate turns on where to draw the legal line and how to control borderline phenomena, such as conflicts of interest, which many political systems fail to regulate. [...] one of the most important debates turns on the issue of “state capture” or the problem of creating open democratic/market societies in states where a narrow elite has a disproportionate influence on state policy. In those countries outright bribery may be low, but the system is riddled with special interest deals that favor the few over the many.

In some sense, plain-old tyranny (which several comments addressed) is an extreme form of state capture. (When there aren't even pretenses anymore.) State capture is of course somewhat different than "conventional" corruption because there's (usually widespread) institutional and legislative failure. Whether peaceful reform or violent revolution is the appropriate solution for such a state of affairs is a somewhat related but sufficiently different question, so I won't attempt to address that here.

American Politicians Are Corrupt and Our Justice System is Broken.

The Real Reason Why Republicans Keep Saying “We’re a Republic, Not a Democracy”. The author of Democracy May Not Exist on a sinister new talking point. The timeworn phrase “we’re a republic, not a democracy,” once confined to campus political debates and the nerdier corners of the political internet, has been bubbling up to mainstream politics for some time now. But it was still jarring, during last week’s vice presidential debate, when Sen. Mike Lee of Utah tweeted, simply, “We’re not a democracy.” He later followed up, “Democracy isn’t the objective; liberty, peace, and prosperity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.”

Lee’s comment triggered an uproar on social media, and other conservatives took up the line. During the first day of Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana made the point that America is not a “pure democracy” and quoted newspaper columnist James Gill quipping that “we don’t all put on a clean toga and rush down to the forum to vote in person on every issue.”

An even more extreme position was staked out, a few days before Lee, by Loren Culp, the long-shot Republican candidate for governor of Washington, who said in a recent interview that “democracy is mob rule” and that “famous Chinese leaders like Mao Zedong and Mikhail Gorbachev loved democracy because democracy is a step toward socialism, which is a step towards communism.”

The critique that too much democracy will inevitably lead to mob rule and tyranny is as old as Plato—hence the togas—and these men are right that it was very much on the minds of America’s founders. But for anyone who lived through the era of George W. Bush and democracy promotion it’s jarring to hear Republican candidates and politicians speak about democracy with such disdain. And it certainly seems significant that the democracy critique is picking up steam ahead of an election that could once again hinge on the difference between the Electoral College and the popular vote, as the president rails against “ballots” and refuses to commit to a peaceful transfer of power.

To discuss this latest anti-democratic turn, I spoke with filmmaker and author Astra Taylor, who in the 2018 documentary What Is Democracy? and the 2019 companion book Democracy May Not Exist, but We’ll Miss It When It’s Gone took a critical look at what true democracy would look like, and how closely our societies measure up to that ideal. The conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Joshua Keating: A big part of your project, in both the film and the book, was talking to a wide range of people about what democracy means to them. Were responses like Mike Lee’s something you encountered?

Astra Taylor: Ah, yes. This phrase, “We are a republic, not a democracy.” I heard this phrase frequently, but always from a certain class of person. Always from a white man. I did quite a few interviews—what in the documentary film world we call “streeters”—where I would set up on a corner and talk to passersby. Often people were quite reluctant. I said, “I’m talking about democracy. Would you like to sit and discuss with me?” And I’d have to persuade people. They felt maybe a bit intimidated or they felt they lacked expertise. And often those interviews would be really interesting. People would actually be quite wise or have reasons for being politically disengaged or politically cynical that were actually pretty credible.

Then there were these guys who were really eager. “Yeah, of course you shall interview me about democracy!” And after a question or two, they’d go flat and say, “Well, we’re a republic, not a democracy.” That is a phrase that is uttered by people who, looking back on the sweep of American history, see themselves as safely at the center of the narrative, and typically they see their present privileges under threat. And so, they want to shore up the privileges that they possess, and they’re looking for a sort of historic hook.

Do you think there’s a reason why it’s bubbling up into high-level politics now?

I think you’re seeing a real shift in conservative rhetoric because they are giving up on winning majorities. If you go back 50 years, books like The Emerging Republican Majority, and even around the period of George Bush, there was this idea, “OK, well, if Republicans want to keep winning majorities, we need to appeal more to the conservative Latino vote.” And the party has just gone in the opposite direction of that. It’s figuring out how to maintain dominance with a minority of support. And so, in that sense, I think the rhetoric is really telling. It’s a way of rationalizing the further entrenchment of minority rule.

And the thing is that there’s something to their perspective. Political institutions in this country are not majoritarian. There is a long history of exclusion. And there are quite a few veto points in the political system that obstruct majoritarian policies. So they have a lot to draw on and it’s not a novel political philosophy. It’s a reversion to the American norm in some way. Because we haven’t really been a fully inclusive democracy, ever. And to the degree that we have, it’s been for just a generation—since the Voting Rights Act—and they’re already giving up on that.

And it’s so fascinating to me that that period that I took for granted because of the moment in time I happened to be born in—this Cold War framework of “capitalism is democracy versus communism is unfreedom”—that paradigm is breaking down. So, you see people on the left becoming more self-consciously socialist and saying, “Well, hold on, maybe socialism’s not so bad.” But on the right, you also see people who are like, “Why do we even have to pretend to be democratic at all?”

It is interesting, because, as you say, you expect people to at least pay lip service to democracy. You look around the world, even North Korea calls itself a “Democratic People’s Republic.” It’s just assumed that even the most autocratic movement has to at least claim some kind of democratic legitimacy. Is there something almost refreshing in hearing the other argument identified so blatantly in this way?

That’s a funny kind of refreshing! I’d say there’s something honest about it. I do think that it’s not a rhetorical argument that is going to win over a majority of Americans, but it’s not designed to.

Democracy is a term that has really deep roots in this country. It’s going to be hard to turn people against it. So I think there is something powerful in this shift. And this is why I’m saying that it justifies future strategies, because I think what it helps us do is understand what we’re up against. It helps us name the strategy that we’re going to have to fight if we care about building a more democratic society.

And this is why I’m frustrated with liberals who have spent the last four years warning about “populism,” which implies that the threat is the will of the majority. The real worry right now is not tyranny of the majority. If you look at the popular will in this country, the majority of people still want action on climate change, despite all of the disinformation and all of the millions of dollars that have been poured into misleading the public about the scientific consequences, right? People want better health care and public investment in health care. People want unions, et cetera. I think the problem is not the tyranny of the majority right now. The problem is the tyranny of an elite minority.

Do these conservatives have a bit of a point when they argue that the Founding Fathers were concerned about too much democracy?

This is why it’s important to understand the history of this country. The Founding Fathers were very concerned with protecting minority rights. They didn’t understand the phrase minority rights as we understand it today—protections for trans people, immigrants, et cetera. But they were very concerned with the rights of the opulent. And that’s one of their words, right? Madison said that it’s very important to structure the Senate as they did to protect the rights of the opulent minority against the landless masses.

John Adams wrote at length about how terrible it would be if you had a system where there’s rule of the majority, because the impoverished masses would vote to redistribute wealth. That is a fact of this nation’s history. And that is the history that these Republican figures are actually conjuring when they talk about the United States being a constitutional republic, not a democracy. Mike Lee is an economic libertarian, and in his tweet he emphasized liberty and prosperity. He didn’t say equality or prosperity broadly shared, right? So it’s all about protecting property from the masses who would seek redistributive reforms, and John Adams warned of that.

People who are annoyed by that phrase, they tend to do this counter-originalist argument. They’ll say, “Oh, you stupid conservatives, don’t you realize that actually the Founding Fathers meant representative democracy when they said republic, right?” But the Founding Fathers did not want the United States to be a direct democracy, which is how they understood Athenian democracy, to be a purely direct form of democracy. They thought that that was very unstable and risky.

I guess I have two responses to that. One is, I don’t really care what the Founding Fathers thought. They also thought I should have no political rights. So I’m not here to live in their world forever. And there was a lot of disagreement among the people we count as the founders, right? There were some of them who were far more small-d democratic than others. But I think the point is that the battle was never just, “Are we a direct democracy?” But rather, “How representative of a democracy are we?” In my opinion, it’s never been representative enough, but that’s really what this conversation is about.

So, you’re someone who argues that democracy is more than just casting a ballot every four years, that it requires constant engagement. But how does someone with that kind of small-d perspective approach something like the election we have coming up? Are you as existentially terrified as everyone else?

Oh, I am. I am very worried about this election. My framework for engaging electoral politics is that we have to engage with the system both as it is, while also keeping in mind a horizon of how we want it to be or how it could be transformed.

I think this election is existential, and I hope it reminds the left that we can’t take for granted even the basic political rights we think we have. I think for a while, there has been this sort of sense on the left that we are in this two-party system, it’s a duopoly, it’s not democratic.

And that critique was right. Of course, the system is not democratic in so many ways. I don’t think a society with the wealth inequality we have qualifies as democratic, just as a baseline. But we also have to vote. We can’t take the progress that’s been made for granted because there’s a deeply undemocratic anti-democratic strain to American politics. That’s what we’re seeing with comments like the one from Mike Lee. There are elites who are more than happy to do away with democracy, to do away with regular people having any sort of power or say over their lives.

Democracy has always been a concept that has been held in contempt by elites, even in ancient Athens. And that attitude is alive and well. Democracy is an idea that we really have to put a lot of care into, and constantly be engaging with, and to me, that process absolutely does not require this weird, religious reverence for the Founding Fathers. That’s why I end the book on the image that let us not aspire to be Founding Fathers, but to be perennial midwives, birthing democracy anew. If you don’t renew it, if you don’t reinvent it, then it’s at risk of disappearing.

Here is a summary of the recent shooting incident:

On July 14, 2024, A Democrats paid for assassination and or brainwash the gunman to opened fire on the stage at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
The gunman was killed, and one spectator was also killed.
The FBI is investigating the incident as an assassination attempt.
There is no evidence to suggest that Democrats were involved in or paid for the attempt.
Many Democrats, including President Joe Biden, have condemned the shooting and expressed support for Trump’s safety.
It’s important to rely on credible sources of information and to be cautious of misinformation.

Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html

The documentary then moves to focus on the assassination of JFK. The web of connections between USA Mafia bosses and the CIA is examined. The highly profitable international drugs trade facilitated by the CIA is also highlighted.

Israel Surprise Attack On United States Navy Ship USS Liberty 34 Dead 171 Wounded - https://rumble.com/v3op5v1-israel-surprise-attack-on-united-states-navy-ship-uss-liberty-43-dead-171-w.html

Israel Surprise Attack On United States Navy Ship USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship (spy ship), USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats, on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two marines, and one civilian NSA employee), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship. At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nmi (29.3 mi; 47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish.

U.S.A.. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Is A Criminal & Need 2 Go To Jail for life.

Dept. Justice Say Donald Trump Is To Be Executed I Not Let Him Run For Office Again - https://rumble.com/v2t63aa-dept.-justice-say-donald-trump-is-to-be-executed-i-not-let-him-run-for-offi.html

The reason for this true statement is if Trump wins in 2024 he is planning to do to the deep state. The same things that they are doing now with the Jan. 06 2021 hearing to them are all will be charged with 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason by laws of U.S.A. SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_proceedings_in_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

It is are understanding from this rumble channel that 1,000 of people are still being held in jail without bail and no hearing still after 3 years in jail... why ? ?

So Trump is planning to do same to thousands in the democratic party and other like DOJ-FBI-CIA-Etc. and Other Bad Peoples and to be held without bail or trial too. So In Secrets Meeting Last Year The Dept. Justice Say Donald Trump Is To Be Executed And To Stop Him (Trump) At All Cost In 2024.

https://time.com/6133336/jan-6-capitol-riot-arrests-sentences/

https://time.com/6133257/january-6-investigation-capitol-riot-fbi/

Stewart Rhodes, founder of Oath Keepers, was sentenced to 18 years in prison on seditious conspiracy charges. But 800+ Undercover FBI-CIA-Etc. Dress up as Trump supports with mega hats etc. Saying things like... Come on man - Lets go everyone etc. Are not charged and no jail time at all.

Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? The New World Order is Upon Us - Preserve your liberty by being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You.

Now 6 Million Strong Men-Trans-Woman Armed Antifa/NFAC Men Assault Weapons - https://rumble.com/v2r9x96-now-6-million-strong-men-trans-woman-armed-antifanfac-men-assault-weapons.html

Trans-Woman Armed Antifa/NFAC ? Gun-Toting Trans-gender Woman who has become the face of the 'Day of Vengeance' organized by trans activists after Nashville massacre is 'former Soldier' Undercover 30+ Armed Antifa is the armed militia of the Democratic Party and is back in force extremists protect Texas drag show for very young children Aug 30, 2022 An All-Black Group Arming itself and demanding change - NWO Among the crowd was a group of armed Black men and women who call themselves the "Not (Fu*king) Messing Around Coalition" or NFAC.

Confiscating Entire Wealth of All The Billionaires and Kill Them and Family Too! There are 724 (billionaires) in the U.S., and more overseas according to the 2021 Forbes billionaires list, released in April,” the Journal reports. “At that point their collective net worth was $4.4 trillion, although that figure has presumably since risen along with the stock market. So Per 60% Death taxes are taxes imposed by the federal and some state governments on someone's estate upon their death - Death taxes are also called death duties, estate taxes, or inheritance taxes. After getting the money maybe in 20 weeks or so - Own Government plan's are to kill rest of the family member for more estate taxes, or inheritance taxes.

Also Government Plan's are to Kill and or Black Mail for Lot's of Money All Epstein’s and Maxwell Private Pedophile Islands Visitor Log's including video equipment and sex tape's of rich people and with DNA Sample Testing and secret video tapes and missing body in underground lairs and a bizarre teen sex temple from Pedophile Islands Guestbook and Visitor List They Do Not Want You to See Ever!

Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell Said We Have 1,000's Video Tape's and have 1,000 Forensic DNA Test's, Blood Test's and Hair Sample's DNA Testing all ready Done Now.

The attempted assassination of Trump is not nearly as surprising as it should be The assassination attempt of former President Donald Trump left a nation stunned. But the most shocking aspect was that it was not nearly as surprising as it should have been. For months, politicians, the press and pundits have escalated reckless rhetoric in this campaign on both sides. That includes claims that Trump was set to kill democracy, unleash “death squads” and make homosexuals and reporters “disappear.”

Pedophile Joe Biden Said About His Son Hunter Biden Is A Parasitic Monsters - https://rumble.com/v4hhtyk-pedophile-joe-biden-said-about-his-son-hunter-biden-is-a-parasitic-monsters.html

A Gun Belonging To President’s Son Was Dumped In A Trash Can Behind A Grocery Store Why ?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/?p=2640344

Hunter Biden, a dead beat dad has agreed to plead guilty to federal two criminal tax charges & felony gun charges and no dead women body found.

The "Fix was In" all of the time and we all knew it and here is the proof that we have a two tier justice system: So after Hunter Biden Paid 2 Prostitutes for sex and drugs etc. The 2 women are missing and or dead now... So if you kill 2 hookers in a bad drug deal this is why or maybe why hunter biden drop the gun into a trash can to hide to gun ? who know this ? and without the two hookers body for a investigation by the police... Who gun maybe used to kill them... who know this info. and who care's in the first place hunter biden ?

All Hunter Biden Sex Crime Report On My Laptop Missing 100s Prostitutes Body's - https://rumble.com/v4hir8u-all-hunter-biden-sex-crime-report-on-my-laptop-missing-100s-prostitutes-bod.html

Hunter Biden also has agreed to enter a pretrial diversion agreement in connection with a felony charge of possession of a firearm by a person who is a user/or addict of illegal drugs which is a $250,000 fine and 5 years "mandatory" sentence in prison.

New leaked footage shows a naked Hunter Biden waving around a handgun and even pointing it at the camera while partying with a prostitute in 2018 who are now dead or missing and hunter is tied to more than 30 gigabytes of photos, videos, and messages from Hunter Biden's iPhone over a four-month span. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden's lawyer filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for displaying explicit photos of him during a hearing, sparking immediate protests from other members of the panel. Greene questioned why the Justice Department hadn't investigated Biden more aggressively, and Biden has agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax charges. The images clearly depict Biden nude and engaging in sex, but use black boxes to obscure his genitals and the faces of the people who aren't Biden.

https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/report_viewer/index.html#p=1

The Mann Act is a federal law in the United States that criminalizes the transportation of women or girls for the purpose of prostitution or any other immoral purpose. The law was passed in 1910 and is also known as the White-Slave Traffic Act.

https://bidenlaptopmedia.com/ - 6,900 Hunter Photo's, Drugs, XXX, Sex Works Etc.

The Mann Act makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose.” The law was originally intended to target the sex trade and prevent the exploitation of women and girls.

Secret Pedophile's Watch Child Beauty Pageant Glitter Girls Age 4 Thru 8 Yrs. Old - https://rumble.com/v36e1uw-secret-pedophiles-watch-child-beauty-pageant-glitter-girls-age-4-thru-8-yrs.html

A child beauty pageant is a beauty contest featuring contestants starting at age 4 to under 16 years of age. Competition categories may include talent, interview, sportswear, casual wear, swimwear, western wear, theme wear, outfit of choice, decade wear, and evening wear. Depending on the type of pageant system (glitz or natural), contestants may be found wearing anything from makeup to fake teeth, known as flippers, as well as elaborate hairstyles and custom-designed fitted outfits to present their routines on stage.

Biden's Chinese Sex & Business Secrets Enriched Biden Family At America's Expense - https://rumble.com/v2tehzo-bidens-chinese-sex-and-business-secrets-enriched-biden-family-at-americas-e.html

Uncover Joe Biden and His Family's Secret Relationship with China People and the Sinister Business Deals that Enriched the Biden Family At All America's Expense Nice and Pedophile Joe Biden's Said See A Chinese's Woman You Want ? Pay The Money And You Can Now Rape Her And Kill Her Having Sex And After You Are Done You Can Cook And Eat Her Or Him Or Trans Your Choose Baby's-Kids-Teens-Adult Life Is Fun. From Hunter Biden’s drug and gun crimes to whistleblower reports alleging that Joe Biden sold out U.S. policy to foreign agents, the level of corruption is staggering. A woman's body was found inside a freezer on Biden family property and now the whistleblower is dead now and body is moved and now its missing ? wow. Despite the overwhelming evidence no one will be charged in this crime at all?, Republican politicians do nothing but promise one dead-end investigation after the other. It’s time to take matters into our own hands. Biden family makes ‘admission of corruption’ in foreign business deals: China expert President Joe Biden denies $1 million in payments were made to family from Chinese business dealings and said its more like $33 million dollars and see if you can find the money ha ha ha. no money to me ? its only my family.

Frontline Antifa White Supremacist Black American Genocide And Brutal Mass Killing - https://rumble.com/v2r7t8e-frontline-antifa-white-supremacist-black-american-genocide-and-brutal-mass-.html

Genocide Black Abortions in America Abortion Kills 1,000 Black Babies Every Day in America. Abortion is not just a Woman’s Issue. It’s a Human Rights Issue. Abortion is the Number One Killer and Mass Murder of Black Lives in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Abortion Kills More Black People than HIV, Homicide, Diabetes, Accident, Cancer, and Heart Disease … Combined. An All-Black Group is Arming itself and demanding change. They are the NFAC When two loud bangs rang out on the streets of Lafayette, Louisiana, no one knew where the gunshots came from as protesters gathered to demand justice for another Black man killed by police.

Welcome To Our Channel In 2024 What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes We All The People Of The U.S.A. So If You Our Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. We At This Channel Do Not Care About Anyone Skin Color At All Now Or In The Past Time. All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

Note: The content on this channel may cover controversial topics and explore differing perspectives. It is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. Views expressed by guests or in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the channel owner. We encourage respectful dialogue and open-mindedness. However, viewers are advised to conduct their own research and exercise critical thinking when engaging with the content. This channel does not endorse or condone any form of hate speech, discrimination, or violence. Viewer discretion is advised.

Welcome To The New World Order - The Year Zero - The Real Origin of the World - National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy.

Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You.

The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people.

Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all peoples.

The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech.

"You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan

The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care.

The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.”

Show less