How The Banks Steal Homes

Who's ready for the truth about their mortgage? LOL
Who has any concept of how VALUABLE their signature is to bankers?

You sign your name.
They're drooling to get it.

What they do with it nets them ZILLIONS on the back end.

Was your mortgage sold?
99.9% yes.

Are you familiar with 1872 Carpenter v Longan?
You ought to be.
It will change your life and set you free.
Watch the video. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇

The Supreme Court is the ONLY remedy between We The People and the Constitution.

You all complain about your rights but you've never ever studied them.

We have.
We do.
This is our life and our entire world 7 days a week.

You must know what the juridical person is vs the living wo/man for only the living have rights.

The juridical person is the parallel entity THEY created to that THEY, that which became a corporation, had to create TO DO BUSINESS WITH YOU.

A corporation can't do business with the living man.
Just ask your bank teller!
It calls you the ENTITY in their own system!

None of this is speculation.
We live it.

We've been fighting this over a decade and set hundreds free from fraud mortgage obligations.

The forensic audit does not come from a Bloomberg terminal.

It comes from a 3rd generation banking family security analyst.

It's INCONTESTABLE in a court of law.
But it will never see a court of law.

Because you the living wo/man have no rights in Article One administrative courts.

Once you have this EVIDENCE, you take this to a Federal common law Article Three court.

So what does the bank do?
Oh they scurry like the rats they are to their BAR card attorneys screaming...."Save us! Get us out of this!"

But they can't.
The bank is a dead entity corporation.
They can only deal with your dead entity corporation juridical person.

They won't ever want to go to discovery or let a common law jury see this evidence.

We're going after the people who actually created the mischief and they can't hide behind attorneys.

“Judges may die, and courts be at an end; but justice still lives, and though she may sleep for a while, will eventually awake, and must be satisfied.”
Quoting Justice Patterson of the United States Supreme Court in Pennhallow v. Doane’s Administrators, 3 U.S. 54.

“If a suit is in the nature of an action at common law, then the matter presumptively concerns private rights,
and adjudication by an Article III court is mandatory.”

“On that basis the court has repeatedly explained that matters concerning private rights may not be removed from Article III courts.” The Court also recognizes a class
of cases concerning “public rights” (collection of revenue, immigration law, etc.) But “even with respect to matters that arguably fall within the scope of the ‘public rights’ doctrine, the presumption is in favor of Article III
courts.” SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. (2024); Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508

U. S. 248, 255 (1993).Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U. S. 50, 69.

Follow me to freedom.

Join the university to learn how.

https://Inalienable.University