braking news Are Democrats Right to Unite Around Kamala Harris

The document is a critical analysis of the Republican and Democratic parties' recent conventions and the role of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris within their respective parties. The author, through their coworker Elias Isquith, likens the Republican convention to a megachurch service, highlighting the party's devotion to Trump, which is described as a personality cult run by his son-in-law. The convention was filled with religious rhetoric, portraying Trump as a leader chosen by God, and the party's submission to his desires, even at the cost of democracy, as evidenced by the attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

The author contrasts this with the Democratic Party, which is characterized as a true political party focused on values and ideas. President Biden is praised for prioritizing the country over personal ambition, stepping down before the election to support a stronger candidate. The Democratic Party is faced with the decision of whether to have an open convention or to coronate Vice President Kamala Harris. The author argues for an open convention, believing it would provide valuable information to the party, which was denied during Biden's unopposed primary run.

The document also discusses the perception of Kamala Harris as a candidate. Initially seen as lacking the intangible qualities that make a candidate appealing, such as authenticity and a clear vision, Harris is now viewed as having developed stability and a strong presence on the campaign trail. Her performance since the debate has been noted for its clarity and strength, and her political skills and wit have been reevaluated positively.

In summary, the document critiques the Republican Party for its transformation into a cult-like entity centered around Trump, while the Democratic Party is commended for its commitment to democratic values and the potential for an open convention. Kamala Harris's political growth is recognized, with the suggestion that she could be a viable candidate for the Democratic ticket.
The document discusses the political landscape surrounding Kamala Harris, focusing on her rise as a potential presidential candidate within the Democratic Party. It highlights her prosecutorial background, which has become appealing in light of Trump's legal troubles, and her ability to withstand pressure during her time as Vice President. Despite her popularity among some liberal circles, there is concern about her electability outside of California and the potential risk of the party rallying around her too quickly, potentially overlooking other candidates and the need for a broader evaluation of her candidacy.

The text suggests a middle path for Democrats, advocating for a series of forums and town halls where Harris and other potential candidates can make their case against Trump, framing it as an exhibition rather than a contest. This approach is seen as a way to provide the party and voters with more information about Harris and her competitors, while also showcasing the Democratic Party's strength as a collective.

The document also delves into Harris's 2009 book, "Smart on Crime," which emphasizes safety as a fundamental civil right and outlines her approach to criminal justice reform. This is contrasted with Trump's perceived threat to safety and the erosion of basic rights under his administration. The text argues that Harris is well-positioned to reclaim the value of safety from Trump and that now is the time for her to demonstrate this.

In summary, the document presents a nuanced view of Harris's candidacy, acknowledging her strengths and the support she has garnered, while also calling for a more thorough and strategic approach to the Democratic primary process. It underscores the importance of safety as a central theme in the upcoming election and suggests that Harris could effectively challenge Trump on this issue.