Premium Only Content
Bill Gates Admits All Shots Contain Programmable Nanotech 600 Million US Doses
Bill Gates Admits Shots Contain Programmable Nanotech Tens Of Millions Will Die Very Soon. When the COVID vaccines were first being distributed to the public, the vaccine inserts were intentionally left blank. Because they were never safe and effective. And for those who did their own research, they were discovered to be deadly. The Moderna patent for this mRNA technology stated that they contain self assembling lipid nanoparticle technology. And now that an estimated six hundred million doses have been administered to the US public, Bill Gates admits this. Pfizer whistleblower, Dr Michael Yeadon, recently stated that without an insurrection we are to expect a new event that will trigger digital ID connected to a digital currency and a wave of fake pandemics and mandated shots, until the population reaches their desired levels.
Based on available information, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that Bill Gates has admitted to the presence of programmable nanotech in COVID-19 vaccines, leading to the deaths of tens of millions of people.
Bill Gates’ Statements
In a 2024 interview, Bill Gates discussed the development of mRNA technology, stating that it can be used to create vaccines with self-assembling lipid nanoparticles. However, he did not mention programmable nanotech or any intention to harm people.
Gates emphasized the need for continued research and improvement of vaccine technology, including the goal of making vaccines more accessible and affordable.
Expert Opinions
Immunology experts have not publicly linked COVID-19 vaccines to the presence of programmable nanotech or mass fatalities.
The World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other reputable health organizations have consistently emphasized the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
Debunking Conspiracy Theories
The notion that vaccine inserts were intentionally left blank is unfounded and has been debunked. Vaccine inserts provide critical information about vaccine composition, side effects, and contraindications.
The Moderna patent mentioned in some sources refers to the use of self-assembling lipid nanoparticles in mRNA technology, not programmable nanotech.
Conclusion
There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that Bill Gates has admitted to the presence of programmable nanotech in COVID-19 vaccines, leading to mass fatalities. The information available suggests that Gates and other experts are focused on improving vaccine technology and accessibility, not harming people. It is essential to rely on credible sources and fact-check information to avoid spreading misinformation.
Bill Gates Now Admits The Shots Contain Nanotech When the COVID vaccines were first being distributed to the public, the vaccine inserts were intentionally left blank. Because they were never safe and effective. And for those who did their own research, they were discovered to be deadly. The Moderna patent for this mRNA technology stated that they contain self assembling lipid nanoparticle technology. And now that an estimated six hundred million doses have been administered to the US public, Bill Gates admits this.
“Making the mRNA is really easy and really cheap. And that’s the magic of this thing. But there’s no doubt in the next five years, we can, you know, we just need to mess around. There’s a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self-assembling. There’s no inherent reason [that] it’s not thermal stable, it’s not cheap and it’s not scalable. And so, as over the five years we fix that part of it, mature it, which is very typical, we’ll be able to build factories worldwide that can make $2 vaccines with even less lead time than we’ve had to have here during this pandemic.” —Bill Gates
Bill says these mRNA shots can easily be programmed to administer any type of spike protein pathogen. And the Moderna patent lists several. Over a hundred pathogens that can be control-released over time so that deaths will appear to be random and mysterious. Those injected are understandably having a hard time accepting this reality, and while they are busy trying to figure out where all the heart attacks, turbo cancer, and neurological disease is coming from, they are being told that it’s due to Climate Change, and that regular pandemics are to now be expected.
During the roll-out of the experimental shots, mainstream media pundit, Chris Cuomo, pushed for vaccine passports and attacked vaccine hesitancy.
“How are they going to know who’s vaccinated? You just said they showed the card. That’s not the answer. The answer is a vaccine passport.”
“Part of the reason that you’re seeing what you’re seeing in Florida is because of vaccine hesitancy.” —Chris Cuomo
Cuomo is now claiming to be injured from the vaccines.
“So today, the New York Times released an article that’s getting a lot of play that says that there are thousands of people who say they’re still suffering side effects, they believe, from the vaccine. We know that vaccines can have unintended consequences, aka side effects, but nobody’s really talking about it because they’re too afraid of blame and they just want it to go away. But the problem is people like Sean and me and millions of others who still have weird stuff with their blood work and their lives and their feelings and, you know, physically, are not going away.” —Chris Cuomo
And he is saying we need a 9/11 style commission to figure it all out.
“You need to have a 9/11 style commission to figure out what worked and what didn’t, and what questions need to be answered because it’s not over. So not only are we not set up for the next pandemic, and there will be one, but we’re not treating people, millions of people who still have problems from the last one.” —Chris Cuomo
Cuomo assures us that there will be another pandemic. And this does seem to be the one sure thing in today’s uncertain times. The released notes on the current discussions of the WHO pandemic treaty, are all about profit margins. Disease X is coming. The US Dollar is beyond saving. But while it still has a heartbeat there are billions to be made by another fake pandemic. And the CEO of Blackrock, Larry Fink, is saying that because of Artificial Intelligence, continuing the depopulation agenda is a good thing.
“I could argue in the developed countries, the big winners are countries that have shrinking populations. The social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations.” —Larry Fink
So long as we the people do nothing, the outcome is predictable. We will be slaves to a bureaucratic non-human system run by machines. And if we want to remain human and save our souls, then we had better stop being complacent audience members and start getting involved. And as long as we remain stubbornly divided, we don’t stand a chance.
Clinical Data Destroys AstraZeneca 1 in 35 had a Serious Adverse Event!
During the darkness of lockdowns, AstraZeneca, the company whose CEO was awarded British knighthood for the creation of its vaccine, whose scientists received an emotional standing ovation at Wimbledon, whose vaccine co-creator had a Barbie doll modelled after her, whose vaccine was even promoted by the king of vaccines himself, Bill Gates, appeared to be the saviour we had all been waiting for. Then, it all went downhill. First slowly and silently, then all at once.
Amid a long history of safety concerns, Oxford’s AstraZeneca vaccine “Vaxzevria” has been officially withdrawn from the global market. Let’s take a quick look back to understand what happened.
AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine was first approved in Canada on February 26, 2021. Within weeks, however, concerns grew about the vaccine’s safety when dozens of countries suspended its use after unusual blood clots were detected in a number of immunized people.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) eventually admitted that there was a “clear” link between AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine and a form of potentially deadly blood clots that had never been known to occur naturally. The condition, coined thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, results in blood clots combined with a low level of platelets. Eventually, at least 26 countries suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine. Some countries began only offering the shots to people over age 40, since the condition primarily affected young adults. Guillain Barré Syndrome was also found to be associated with the vaccine.
Then came reports that the vaccine didn’t even work to prevent transmission. A paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published in The Lancet (Chau et al.), found that, when infected with the dominant Delta variant, AstraZeneca-vaccinated individuals carried 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared with the unvaccinated.
AstraZeneca was found to have used “outdated and potentially misleading data” that overstated the effectiveness of its vaccine, according to The Data and Safety Monitoring Board in their report to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Despite all this evidence, AstraZeneca sold almost $4 billion US worth of the injectables worldwide in 2021.
This brings us to May 7th, 2024, when “Vaxzevria” was officially withdrawn from the global market.
The removal of its authorization came just weeks after the company admitted in a UK court document that its shot can cause thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. The company had originally denied a causal link.
AstraZeneca did not cite the admission as contributing to its decision. Instead, it stated that there was now an “oversupply of updated vaccines.” AstraZeneca’s admission, revealed in a UK high court, came to light through a lengthy class action legal battle in the UK in April. That case involved claims of injuries and deaths in the UK allegedly caused by their vaccine. The company has also faced a mountain of lawsuits worldwide.
This lawsuit is compounded by AstraZeneca’s most recent Phase III two-year post-vaccine safety clinical trial study results, which are quite alarming.
In November 2023, the EMA published AstraZeneca’s mandated Phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center study. The study followed over 30,000 adult participants who received a placebo, or one to two doses of its Vaxzevria COVID-19 vaccine over the course of two years. The study defined a serious adverse event as a side effect that results in “death; immediately life-threatening; … hospitalization; persistent or significant disability; congenital abnormality or birth defect; an important medical event.” Out of the 21,587 participants who received a vaccine, 621 developed a serious adverse event (SAEs)—equating to a shocking 1 in 35 people! Additionally, 1 in 5 people sought or required medical attention after the vaccine (MAAEs). And 1 in 9 people had some form of adverse reaction (AESIs).
Had all clinical studies been completed before the vaccine rollout, it never would have made it to market. Instead, under the guise of “Emergency Authorization,” a deadly product was injected into the arms of millions. Ultimately, safety is what should be a top priority in medicine. The Hippocratic Corpus says, “Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient.” It seems the AstraZeneca vaccine did neither.
In a statement, AstraZeneca said: “Our sympathy goes out to anyone who has lost loved ones or reported health problems. Patient safety is our highest priority.” It’s unlikely that “sentiment” will ever be enough for its victims.
Japanese Leader Apologizes, “So Many Have Died, and They Shouldn’t Have” Kazuhiro Haraguchi, the former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs, has become the first major politician to apologize to the unvaccinated for the tsunami of deaths occurring among the vaccinated population.
On May 24, huge numbers of Japanese citizens took to the streets to protest against the crimes against humanity perpetrated by globalist organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) during the pandemic. During an opening speech at the protests, Haraguchi delivered a powerful and emotional apology for the huge numbers of deaths now occurring as a result of the deadly mRNA roll-out.
Haraguchi began by addressing the grief and loss felt by families who have lost loved ones who were coerced into taking the COVID jab. With a deep sense of sincerity, he extended his condolences and took responsibility for the failings of those in power. “I apologize to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldn’t have,” he said.
Thelibertybeacon.com reports: One of the key points in Haraguchi’s speech was his criticism of the ban on Ivermectin, a drug developed by Dr. Satoshi Omura, which he believed could have played a significant role in combating the pandemic. Haraguchi questioned the motives behind the ban, suggesting that economic interests were prioritized over public health. “Why? Because they are cheap. They don’t want it because it will interfere with the sales of the vaccines,” he argued. This statement drew loud applause from the crowd, many of whom felt that corporate profits had taken precedence over human lives.
Haraguchi then shared a deeply personal story about his own health struggles. After receiving vaccines, he developed a severe illness, specifically, a rapidly progressing form of cancer. “This time last year, I had neither eyebrows nor hair. Two out of the three supposed vaccines I received were lethal batches,” he revealed. This candid account of his battle with cancer, which included significant physical changes like hair loss, struck a chord with the audience. He recounted an incident where his appearance became a point of distraction in the Diet (the national legislature of Japan), with an opponent focusing more on his wig than the issues at hand.
Adding to the conversation, Haraguchi disclosed that he was not the only member of Japan’s National Diet to suffer adverse effects from vaccines. He mentioned that three of his colleagues had been severely affected, with some even hospitalized. “They are falling to pieces, some hospitalized. But they don’t speak up,” he explained. This revelation underscored a broader issue: the reluctance or inability of public figures to discuss their personal health challenges openly.
Haraguchi was particularly passionate about the attempts to silence those who question current policies and government actions. He recounted a recent incident where he was banned from speaking on Channel 3. “The other day, I spoke with the President of Channel 3, and I was banned. They are trying to silence our voices,” he stated. This attempt to censor dissenting voices highlighted a critical concern about freedom of speech and expression. Haraguchi urged the audience to remain steadfast in their resolve, saying, “They are trying to block our freedom, our resistance, our power. But we will never lose.”
In the conclusion of his speech, Haraguchi issued a rallying call for action. He urged the people to stand united in challenging the government and its questionable decisions. “Let’s overthrow this government,” he proclaimed, emphasizing the need for change and accountability. He called on legislators to continue fighting for the people’s lives and freedoms, “Let’s make it happen,” he concluded.
The “Baffling” Rise in Cancer Cases Multiple cancer-causing mechanisms have been associated with COVID injections. With the unprecedented rise in cancer cases worldwide, it’s time for an immediate moratorium on the vaccination campaign.
In 2022, there were an estimated 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million deaths from cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that about one in five people develop cancer in their lifetimes, and approximately one in nine men and one in twelve women die from the disease (WHO, 2024). The WHO has predicted a rise in cancer rates of 77% by 2050, which represents 35 million new cases. But the actual increase will exceed this by far. The Wall Street Journal reported in January 2024 that “cancer is striking more young people, and that doctors are alarmed and baffled,” (WSJ, 2024) with the reasons for this said to be “unknown.”
In 2020, SARS-CoV-2 gained worldwide attention and has since been discussed as a potential carcinogen (Chambers, 2023). But it is actually since 2021—the year of the so-called COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout—that the rates of onset and progression of cancer changed dramatically worldwide. Due to receiving emergency approval, this gene therapy did not require any carcinogenicity studies at all. Since then, however, countries all over the world have reported a steady rise in new cancer cases.
Due to their sudden onset and rapid progression, these cases are often termed “turbo cancers,” with some appearing just days after the injection (Abdurrahman, 2024; Eens et al., 2023). Over 200 case reports have been written about this new phenomenon (React19, 2024). This year, for the first time, over two million new cancer diagnoses are expected to be made in the USA alone (ACS, 2024).
Carcinogenic COVID gene therapy
More and more studies are confirming that many elements of the COVID-19 gene therapy (“vaccine”) are carcinogenic. But, because our current scientific model takes a reductionistic approach, it is unlikely that the result of the synergistic actions of all these components will ever be investigated. As three-quarters of the world’s population has received this intervention, the scientific evidence already available demands that an investigation be conducted to rule out or confirm its causal relationship to the sudden increase in rates of cancer worldwide.
Many of the potentially problematic elements are ingredients of the mRNA technology. As this is the same technology that is now being promoted as the future of cancer therapy, this poses an essential question for its use in this field.
A recent Japanese paper demonstrated statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates from cancer as a whole, as well as some specific types of cancer, namely leukemia, as well as ovarian, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers. They were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP (lipid nanoparticle) vaccine. [i.e., Pfizer and Moderna.] In the opinion of the authors, marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive (estrogen receptor alpha) cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination, rather than to COVID-19 infection itself, or to reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. (Gibo, 2024) Moderna has even admitted that its mRNA COVID vaccine causes cancer, after billions of DNA fragments were found in vials of the injection. (Exposé, 2024)
Cancer statistics suppressed
While medical practitioners and people all over the world report an unexpected increase in incidences of cancer, in most countries, it has become a challenge to obtain any official data on cancer. In Germany, statistics are available after a five-year delay only. So, we have to rely on independent experts in the field, case studies of individuals, and the occasional provision of data after freedom of information requests, which are usually time-consuming and expensive.
Professor Mustafar, a former WHO panel advisor, drew attention to a worrying health issue that manifested concomitantly with the vaccine rollout, stating, “I have seen an alarming increase in cancer rates.” (Mustafar, 2024)
Earlier this year, data analyst Edward Dowd shed light on the UK’s annual Personal Independence Payment (PIP) clearances (payments) by body system. (Dowd, 2024) This highly-respected data expert examined different metrics for 2020, 2021, and 2022, and found that, in 2022, hematological (blood-related) claims were up a staggering 522% above trend.
It was not just blood-related disorders that were soaring, however. Among the other red flags, Dowd discovered that deaths from colorectal cancer rose 17% among 15-to-44-year-olds during that time, which was four times the population-wide increase. Uterine cancer deaths rose 37% among 25-to-44-year-olds from 2019 to 2023—15% overall.
Especially troubling is the presence and rise of colorectal cancer in young people. Harvard medical professor Kimmie Ng found that the “steepest rises” were “in the very youngest people, those in their 20s and 30s,” which another cancer expert called “alarming.” (Washington Post, 2024) This age group did not experience any risk of colorectal cancer a few years ago.
A recent US study demonstrated a rise in excess mortality from neoplasms as the underlying cause of death, which started in 2020 (1.7%) and accelerated substantially in 2021 (5.6%) and 2022 (7.9%) (Alegria, 2024). Furthermore, Professor Konstantin Beck from the University of Lucerne reported that there has been a doubling of the cancer rate in Switzerland since 2021 (Beck, 2024).
Pathways to Cancer
Whilst doctors and the public are usually told that there is no evidence that the COVID gene therapies cause cancer, the truth is that the manufacturers were never required to investigate this. This is despite testing for carcinogenicity being a standard procedure that is required prior to the approval of a medication.
Professor of Oncology, Angus Dalgleish, has repeatedly warned of immune exhaustion via boosters and the use of the oncogenic promotor sequence SV40 in the Pfizer mRNA injections (Dalgleish, 2024).
Despite the suppression of information about the contents and mechanisms of the COVID-19 gene therapies, independent researchers have identified a substantial list of “vaccine” ingredients and mechanisms that could potentially result in the development of cancer.
Immune System Suppression: The vaccines might alter immune checkpoints crucial for preventing cancer cells from growing. This could weaken the body’s ability to detect and destroy cancer cells.
Carcinogenic Lipid Nanoparticles: The lipid nanoparticles themselves increase inflammation and contain substances that are likely carcinogenic and highly toxic. ’
Protein Interactions: The vaccine’s components might interact with proteins that suppress tumors, like p53 and BRCA (1 and 2), which are vital for repairing DNA and controlling cell growth.
Cancerous Protein on the S-protein Subunit of the Vaccine: A cytokine (TNFα), in partnership with glycosylated CD147, conspires to create fertile soil for de novo and recurrent cancer.
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis: COVID-19 vaccines may generate a specific environment that can lead to neoplastic transformation that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and metastasis.
Interference with Immune Signals: The vaccines could disrupt signals (Type 1 Interferon) that help the immune system respond to infections and abnormal cell growth, potentially affecting how the body fights tumors.
“Vaccine” Spike Binding to Estrogen Receptors: The increased mortality rates for these cancers might be caused by cell proliferation mediated by the binding of the spike protein to estrogen receptors.
Inflammatory Response: The spike protein in the vaccine might trigger the release of specific growth factors (TGF BETA) that could accelerate the progression of cellular changes from normal to cancerous states.
Concerns about Contamination: There are concerns about contamination of the “vaccines” with DNA sequences that might integrate into the recipient’s DNA, potentially leading to cancer. These sequences come from the manufacturing process and may pose significant risks. In the Pfizer vaccines, a tumor-promoting sequence named SV40 was found in all vials examined.
Antibody Composition: Repeated vaccinations might increase a type of antibody (IgG4) associated with a reduced immune response to cancer cells, potentially allowing tumors to evade the immune system more effectively.
Unusual Peptide Production: The vaccine might cause the cellular machinery to misread genetic codes, leading to abnormal protein production, which could have unforeseen effects, including potential cancer risks.
Modification of Genetic Makeup: The nucleic acid base Uridine was replaced in both mRNA injections by Pseudouridine, which is a known carcinogen.
Call to Label mRNA Technology a Class 1 Carcinogen
Carcinogens are agents that can cause cancer through a multistep process involving the alteration of cellular and genetic mechanisms, leading to the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells. A Class 1 Carcinogen is the highest classification, used when the agent is carcinogenic to humans. As we have seen above, there is ample evidence of multiple potential pathways by which the COVID-19 intervention may cause carcinogenicity in humans.
Conclusion
Before rolling out a medical intervention, especially globally, its efficacy and safety must be assured. We have known for a long time that neither of these criteria were fulfilled in the case of the COVID-19 gene therapy (vaccine) programme. In fact, the injection makes it more likely that the recipient will catch COVID-19, does not prevent severe disease progression or death (Fürst et al., 2024), and, depending on the study, has caused between a few and 17 million deaths so far.
Cancer usually takes many months to years to develop. The fact that already, since the start of the “vaccination” programme, cancers have been associated with the injections, is more than concerning. Clinicians all over the world have been reporting new occurrences and reoccurrences of cancers related to the injections in all age groups.
So far, the pathophysiology requires that the COVID-19 “vaccine” be classified as a Class 1 Carcinogen. Continuing to give booster shots increases the risks associated with the injection even further, considering the mechanisms listed above. Extensive pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and genotoxicity evaluations, as well as population-based observational studies to assess the potential carcinogenic risk posed by the genetic vaccines and to understand all its pathogenic mechanisms, must be initiated. Until then, an immediate moratorium on the use of these “vaccines” and an honest scientific debate on the entire COVID-19 “vaccine” programme, must be initiated.
Personal note
Of course, we appreciate that “correlation is not causation.” However, in our small practice alone, cancer has become so commonplace that it is now the “daily bread” of the treatments we offer. For the first time in 30 years of clinical practice, we are seeing cases of cancer in the eyes, leukemia in newborns, multiple cancers in one breast, and entire families with cancer. Our medical boards and health agencies are, on average, three-quarters sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. We cannot rely on them to investigate the actual causes of the explosion of cancer worldwide. We therefore ask you to please support independent researchers and the World Council for Health in our pursuit of the truth.
COVID Nonsense Helped Raise Awareness of the Vaccine Industry’s Real Agenda In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed “vaccine hesitancy” as one of the top ten threats to global health. “The reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines,” this multi-billion-dollar agency explained, “threatens to reverse progress made in tackling vaccine-preventable diseases.” According to the WHO: “Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of avoiding disease—it currently prevents 2-3 million deaths a year, and a further 1.5 million could be avoided if global coverage of vaccinations improved.”
In 2019, a lot of people believed this to be true, shaking their heads in dismay at “those crazy antivaxxers.” Five years later, there’s a shift happening. More people than ever before—especially those in healthcare professions—are starting to do their own research, use their own human brains to think about things that they always took at face value, and change their minds about vaccines. According to a peer-reviewed article published last week in Nature’s Scientific Reports, there has been a “global rise in vaccine hesitancy.”
Beth, a nurse, said, “Yes, the best thing to happen in all this Covid nonsense is that many of us have learned more about the vaccine industry. … I won’t get another.”
An M.D. colleague of mine, who has been squarely pro-vaccine his entire career, has started to change his mind about vaccines. The reason? He’s spending most of every day in his clinical practice treating mainstream patients who are suffering from severe adverse reactions to the vaccines they’d been so eager to get. After seeing the reactions for himself, he did something he did not used to do as a busy clinician in private practice: he started looking beyond the CDC’s recommendations and reading scientific studies for himself. Several studies he read, and alternative news articles about them, left him with so much cognitive dissonance that he almost decided to quit medicine for good.
Vaccine studies that should give you pause
Three of these peer-reviewed scientific studies about COVID-19 vaccine safety caught his attention:
1) A 2022 study by Italian scientists that showed that 94 percent of vaccinated patients who went to the doctor with subsequent health problems presented with abnormal blood. The three Italian scientists who examined freshly drawn blood of more than a thousand patients noted that though they had no clear explanation for their findings, they were so unusual that they felt the need to alert the medical community.
2) A 2022 study published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology by an international team of researchers that included an MIT senior scientist and one of the world’s foremost and most respected cardiologists, presented evidence that the mRNA vaccines impaired type 1 interferon signaling, which has diverse—and sometimes devastating—consequences to human health, including a “causal link” to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, and cancer.
3) An extended analysis conducted by a team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and several other elite universities that found that COVID-19 booster shots for young people actually caused many more serious adverse events for every one (1) theoretical COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization they prevented. Among the team of scientists that published this paper was Dr. Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., the director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery. The paper concluded that, given efficacy and safety concerns, mandating COVID-19 vaccines for college students was unethical.
A doctor I know had previously testified in favour of allowing state officials to bar unvaccinated or partially vaccinated children from attending public school, private school, and daycare. The bill he supported, thankfully, was not passed into law. Why would he have supported taking medical freedom and vaccine choice away from parents?
I choose to believe that nearly all doctors have human health and their patients’ well-being at the forefront of their minds. Yes, doctors like the respect they get from being medical doctors. Sure, they love the money and the houses they can buy with it, the vacations they can take, and the elite colleges they can afford to send their children to. But most doctors also, care deeply about the people who come to them for help.
This doctor once believed that by protesting against allowing unvaccinated and partially vaccinated children to attend school, he was helping make America a healthier, happier place. In his mind—programmed by four years of medical training, a residency, continuing education courses, most, if not all, of his colleagues, the billboards he passed on the highway on his commute to the office every day, the advertising he saw on TV, and the news channels he tuned into several times a day—vaccines were synonymous with health. And the more vaccinated a child, the healthier. You don’t know what you don’t know.
He didn’t know that, due to federal law, vaccine manufacturers in America are not liable for vaccine-related adverse events caused by the products they manufacture. And he admitted, in a confessional tone of voice, that before COVID he probably wouldn’t have cared anyway. He didn’t believe in vaccine adverse events, had never filed a VAERS report, and had always dismissed patients’ concerns that the problem their child experienced right after being vaccinated as an “unfortunate coincidence.” In his mind, bad vaccine reactions simply didn’t exist. He’d never bothered to peruse a single peer-reviewed article about vaccine safety, read a vaccine critical book, or attend a holistic health conference.
Why would he?
Reading a book about safety, efficacy, and necessity issues related to vaccines would have been like reading a book about the safety of broccoli or the efficacy of drinking water to hydrate the body.
But now, this doctor has changed his mind. He’s caring for hundreds of patients trying to heal from adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines. He’s been in practice for over twenty years, and is currently seeing conditions he has never seen before—turbo cancers, heart problems, neurological problems, blood clots, and immune dysfunction. Most of these patients have had both COVID infections and at least two—sometimes as many as five or six—COVID vaccines. It’s hard to pinpoint the exact cause of these problems and the mechanisms by which they are happening. Could it be due to the COVID infections? The vaccines? The boosters? The conventional treatments, including Paxlovid? Or some combination of all of these?
Though this doctor does not know the answers, he has now filed over a dozen VAERS reports to alert the CDC. To date, no one at the CDC has responded to any of his reports. He has over a thousand families in his practice. He employs another medical doctor, a nurse practitioner, and front-end staff. For the past three plus years, he’s chosen to work quietly from behind the scenes, trying to gently educate his mainstream allopathic-minded patients about his new vaccine safety concerns without alienating them.
While the world needs more medical doctors to speak publicly about the vaccine safety concerns and the adverse events they’re seeing firsthand, this doctor is afraid to come out of the closet. He accepts insurance, has a diverse patient population, and doesn’t want to lose his license. He’s also trying very hard to avoid being witch-hunted, as so many COVID critical doctors, including my co-author, Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D., my colleague, Dr. Steven LaTulippe, M.D., and my friend and colleague Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D., already have.
So what is the vaccine industry’s real agenda?
Medicine is big business. These mRNA vaccines have proven their worth as money makers, allowing pharmaceutical executives to buy luxury real estate and put their newly-minted billions into off-shore bank accounts. The more people who get vaccinated, the more money everyone in the industry makes. There’s nothing wrong with making money. But becoming rich at the expense of our children’s health and continuing to promote a toxic, so-called preventative measure, despite clear evidence that the harms outweigh the benefits, is antithetical to the practice of medicine.
Still, as Beth, the nurse, so eloquently pointed out, the good news about this COVID nonsense is that more Americans than ever before are becoming aware of medical malfeasance.
We may be on the cusp of a collective shift: a new national awareness about the importance of avoiding toxins, individualizing medicine, and thinking for ourselves.
Imagine a healthy body weakened, an adolescent mind losing its edge. Illicit drugs, you might guess? Or a terrible disease that has crippled a young life? There’s yet another discomfiting possibility: That of a child captured by the gender cult, a cult that brainwashes children into believing that they were “born in the wrong body,” then poisons them with pharmaceuticals designed to “change” their sex.
The number of transgender children has exploded. Dr. Lisa Littman, prominent gender physician-researcher, believes in a social contagion theory to explain the 4,000 percent rise in gender dysphoric youth over the past five years. According to Littman, especially girls have been swayed in great numbers by peers or social media to assume a trans identity. Approximately 300,000 minors in the US claim such an identity.
This is transgenderism, the cult-like phenomenon cloaked in the righteous rhetoric of a civil rights movement. It promotes the fallacy of “sex change,” an absurd belief glamorized by politicians and actors, sports icons and celebrities who are the new-fangled revivalists and preachers, their bombastic jargon as empty and unscientific as it is large. It holds that a muscle-bound man, clad in a one-piece racer and sports bra represents oppressed “transwomen,” who suffer for a lack of human rights. But the real victims are children, their bodies maimed, commodified, and used to promote an ideology that turns reality on its head.
Gender-hucksters, and a worldwide nexus of NGOs (non-governmental organizations) and corporate behemoths have capitalized on the West’s empathy toward marginalized groups. Enter big pharma, which rarely misses a chance to retrofit an old drug to a new malady. Lupron is such a drug.
Originally formulated by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, it is a GnRH agonist, a powerful compound used to interrupt hormone production in men and women. When its use as an end-stage prostate cancer treatment no longer turned a profit, it was repurposed as a treatment for endometriosis and precocious puberty (a medical condition of very early onset puberty).
Today, Lupron is a highly profitable drug because of its resurrection as a puberty blocker, the first line treatment in children who believe they were born in the wrong body. According to Komodo Health, nearly 18,000 US minors were taking puberty blockers between 2017 and 2021. In 2020, it brought in $752 million in revenue. As a gender “treatment,” Lupron shuts down puberty. Cross-sex hormones are then administered to “change” the child’s sex.
Lupron, though, has an ominous past: an alarming list of adverse effects, including increased risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and convulsions. Bone loss in adolescents is a documented effect of treatment that can lead to early osteoporosis. Depression and mania (bi-polar) have also been observed in children taking this drug. Lupron might even affect brain structure in developing youths, potentially lowering IQ.
Though not FDA-approved for use as a puberty blocker or subjected to clinical trials to show its efficacy and safety in gender-confused youth, Lupron is routinely and casually prescribed off-label to children in the more than 100 gender clinics in the US.
The media props up the lie that blockers and cross-sex hormones are safe in these children, but the truth is surfacing. In her blockbuster book, Time to Think, BBC journalist, Hannah Barnes, exposes the corruption of London’s infamous, now-closed Tavistock Clinic, and how puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones were freely given to children with underlying emotional problems such as autism and anxiety. The Tavistock Clinic is facing what could be the largest class action lawsuit ever, with international law firm, Pogust Goodhead, representing its many victims.
In February 2023, Missouri whistleblower, Jamie Reed, former case worker at Washington University’s Transgender Pediatric Center, submitted an affidavit to the Missouri Attorney General’s office, which shook the world of trans medicine with her claims that parents were being coerced into allowing their children to be given blockers and hormones. Reed maintains that many of these children had long-standing mental health issues that were never addressed, and that gender treatments exacerbated these conditions or brought on irreversible maladies that were ignored.
Meanwhile, Norway, Sweden, the U.K., and France have suspended the casual use of these dangerous “treatments” in favor of psychotherapy.
In the U.S., at least 18 states have passed laws preventing “gender affirming care.” Yet despite mounting evidence that gender medicine is the biggest medical scandal of all time, others—California and Minnesota—have stubbornly ramped up their defense of such cruel treatment. New Mexico’s Democratic Governor Grisham signed a law permitting gender treatment without parental consent.
Grisham and her ilk continue to promote the corporate gender pharmaceutical complex. In the end, though, they are bound to a crippling legacy: a generation of children whose minds and bodies are maimed by the repercussions of a false ideology, one that suspends scientific belief in favor of a medical scam.
Detransitioners Testify in US Government Hearings Here are transcriptions of testimony from three young women who transitioned from female to male and are now detransitioning.
Chloe Cole (@ChoooCole on X) testified before the Tennessee legislature
My name is Chloe Cole, and I’m detransitioning, a former trans child from rural California. From the time I was seventeen, I’ve been travelling and giving my cautionary tale to legislatures across the country. I have dedicated my early adulthood to make sure that no child in America, and the rest of the world, will be harmed by gender ideology, and specifically, cross-sex interventions like the double mastectomy and cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers that defined my childhood. I’m extremely grateful to have the opportunity to have a part in Tennessee’s Age Restriction Bill last year, however the country has acted too slowly. Thousands have already been harmed. Half the country is continuing to harm our children and young men and women. The number of people like me, who are now realizing they made a mistake, is growing and I’m excited to finally be able to advocate for my own demographic—the detransitioners.
I’m nineteen years old. I shouldn’t have to worry about this. At thirteen, I had a healthy body. Now, I live in complete uncertainty surrounding my health. I don’t know what’s to come for me. I don’t know how much harm these procedures have done to my body. I don’t know if I’m going to be able to have kids. When I got my blood testing done, I was given the male averages for hormones, instead of the female averages like I requested. Doctors look at my mastectomy, look at the complications; surgeons had taken skin grafts from my areolas that now leak clear fluid and sometimes blood. I have to wear bandages every single day to keep it from staining my shirt and my bedding. Doctors look at me and they just shrug. The experiment is never ending. I’m terrified. It’s miserable to look down at my chest every day in confusion and uncertainty. Nobody deserves this.
California, my home state, is not safe for me; they make it clear every time I walk into the doctor’s office. All I know is gender affirmation, but I’m tired of being told there’s no way out for me, I’m tired of being told that “I’m just on a gender journey.” I’m done.
My friends and I are creating community to advocate for ourselves and we deserve some real answers. We need to be able to come to Tennessee and get real medical care, instead of the ideologically-driven pseudo-science in California. Let’s provide options. I’m grateful that you all have taken the courageous step to halt these harmful interventions and the next step will be restoration. As it is right now, there is no gate-keeping the transition. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) files1 that were released yesterday have proven that. I’m extremely grateful to the early detransitioners who have carved a path forward, and I’m working to continue that effort and we need your legislative help.
Morgan Keller (@in-detransit on X) testified before the Ohio Government Oversight Committee for Health Bill 68
My name is Morgan Keller, I’m twenty-six years old and was trans-identified for five years. In March of this year, after trying to ignore the doubt and regret that began to build around my transition, I woke up one morning with the realization that my trans identity was never about becoming my most genuine self, or living my life authentically; instead, it was a desperate, last-ditch attempt to become someone else—to escape my unidentified trauma and body and mental health issues.
When I started exploring gender ideology, my life was in shambles. I was in an emotionally-manipulative lesbian relationship; I was isolating myself in an apartment and drinking regularly. I wasn’t attending my classes or socializing normally. I had become captivated by the idea that my female body was fundamentally wrong, and seduced by the prospect that there was something I could do about it. When I sought out help for my complicated feelings towards my female sex, I was affirmed, which is to say, I was put on life-altering cross-sex hormones with minimal questioning or treatment of my underlying issues.
At 21, a licensed practitioner in the state of Ohio wrote me a prescription for medically-unnecessary synthetic testosterone, and just one month after my 22nd birthday, I went under the knife for a double mastectomy based on the recommendation letter from a therapist who still holds an active license in the state. I sat with these practitioners for hours, describing how uncomfortable I was in my body, how disconnected I felt from myself, how hard it was to walk through the world as a masculine woman. The nurse practitioner who prescribed me testosterone, told me that I would transition beautifully, and that no one would ever be able to tell that I was born as a female. After a lifetime of body image issues and increasing desperation to become anybody but myself, that was like music to my ears. I don’t believe that not transitioning was ever considered by my practitioners. I feel like once I walked into that gender clinic, medicalization was the only option. I needed the practitioners that I trusted to help me make peace with my body, not affirm my delusions that hormones and cosmetic mastectomy might help me feel better. I needed them to just say, “No.”
This week is the first anniversary of my first testosterone shot. I was told that this experimental medicalization would save my life. My parents were made to believe that this was the only way to keep their daughter alive, healthy, and happy. No practitioner bothered to dig deeper with me about why I felt so disconnected from my female body, and why I thought giving myself an endocrine imbalance, amputating my healthy breasts, and masquerading as a member of the opposite sex, was such an appealing treatment plan. I can say with 100% certainty that this new medication only gave me new health problems and mental distress. I will never, ever legitimize these experimental treatments as anything based on love or care for an individual.
Under the euphemistic guise of lifesaving, gender-affirming care, practitioners in our state have become enablers with their prescription pads. At its highest point, my testosterone levels were eleven times the maximum range for the female body. Is this really the standard of care we want for our Ohioans?
When I realized my medicalization was nothing more than a very elaborate placebo, endorsed by multiple medical professionals, I made the immediate decision to detransition. It was all over. I quit testosterone cold turkey and endured four of the most brutal months of my entire life. I had no energy, I didn’t shower for almost two weeks, I would cry upwards of ten times a day, shocked by what I’d been allowed to do to my body in such a vulnerable state with an undeveloped brain. I would lay in bed all day, sitting with the realization that I would never be able to breast feed children that I didn’t ever know I wanted at the time I got my mastectomy. I didn’t know if those feelings would ever go away, so I started to make plans to commit suicide. My family was so worried, that my parents made me go home so they could make sure I was eating, bathing, and sleeping. I sent a letter to my prescribing practitioner, detailing how much regret I felt, and all of the things I wished were different about the treatment I received, and she never replied.
I had been working with the same therapist for seven years by the time I called her with my realizations about the issues underlying my decision to transition. I sent her lists of everything that should have been treated instead of getting hormones and a mastectomy, and I will never forget hearing her tell me, “I failed you.” She told me that this was such a new field of psychology, that modern medicine is still at the forefront of learning how to treat gender dysphoria. But isn’t that funny? The current narrative says that this medicalization is “settled science.” I couldn’t give informed consent at twenty-one, so why are we pretending that children can do that?
With this Bill, we can ensure that children in Ohio are protected from ever waking up and finding themselves in my position. I wish I never opened the Pandora’s box of gender ideology; I wish I’d been told “No” by the practitioners who I trusted. I wish I could say that I’m the exception to the rule, but everyone in this room knows that that is false. I come to you wearing the scars of this medical scandal, asking you to please vote in support of Health Bill 68, to protect Ohio’s children. Thank you for listening.
Katie Lennon (Anderson), (@Katie1080 on X) testified in Concord, New Hampshire, in favor of Parental Rights Bill SB272. She transitioned at 18.
Like many children and teens today, I identified myself as transgender for years, and when I started to feel confused and ashamed about my developing body, I asked everyone in my life to call me by a new name and use male pronouns to refer to me. So, in other words, I went through a social transition from female to male. Everyone in my life immediately affirmed my new identity, either out of full support for it, or just to stay neutral and not cause any issues. But the constant affirmation, both active and passive, solidified me in my transgender identity. No one meant to lock me into an identity that would later leave me broken, ashamed, and more confused than before. They were really all just being nice.
But the social transition eventually wasn’t enough, and I soon felt I needed to take testosterone. And when that wasn’t enough, I had a double mastectomy. And when that still wasn’t enough, I had a total hysterectomy, including the removal of my uterus, cervix, fallopian tubes and both ovaries. There’s no point of contentment during a gender transition. We get fleeting moments of euphoria, but ultimately, one step leads straight into the next, and I thought that in the end, I could really become a man, but all I became was a mutilated and abused version of my old self.
Social transition is a big deal and we’re lying when we say any of this is reversible. This is a big decision with lifelong consequences, and New Hampshire doesn’t even require that parents be involved. If the roles of mother and father don’t include authority for the emotional, social, and physical future of their children, the roles no longer mean anything.
Like me, transgender-identifying youth have a high risk for depression. The Trevor project, which is an LGBT advocacy group, reports that 45% of LGBT teens have seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year. More than half of that number is transgender-identifying youth. Teachers and school administrators are mandated reporters, and if a child is suspected of being four times more likely to attempt suicide than the other students his age, his parents have a right to know. And SB272 will ensure that parents are notified if their children are identifying with a high-risk community, and will allow the parents to decide the next best step for their child. Please vote in support of SB272.
Absurdity Observer – June 2024 A Yale University study published in JAMA (Sayed et al.) finds that 57% of US doctors received payments from Pharma firms over the past decade, totalling 12 billion USD. The average amount paid to the top .1% of orthopedists was $4,826,944. For the top .1% of cardiologists, it was $3,197,675, and for the top .1% of neurologists and psychiatrists, it was $2,588,819. The drugs related to the highest industry payments were blood thinners Xarelto and Eliquis, followed by Humira, to treat psoriasis, and Invokana and Jardiance—both used to treat type 2 diabetes.
Food Banks Canada’s annual poverty report card finds that food bank visits have increased by 50% since 2021. The report also found that one in four Canadians have unstable or inadequate access to food.
Parks Canada announces a new policy allowing “newcomers to Canada and new Canadian citizens” free admission for a year to all national parks, historic sites, and marine conservation areas. However, if you’re already a tax paying citizen, you’ll be paying full price (about $75 for a single adult or $151 for a family).
AstraZeneca withdrew its COVID-19 vaccine globally after its phase three clinical trial data revealed that 1 in 9 people experienced an adverse event and 1 in 35 participants experienced a serious adverse event. The company has faced a mountain of lawsuits worldwide and has recently admitted in court that its COVID-19 vaccine can cause a unique condition that can lead to blood clots.
A new Cleveland Clinic study concludes that, “consistent with similar findings in many prior studies, a higher number of prior vaccine doses was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19. The exact reason for this finding is not clear. It is possible that this may be related to the fact that vaccine-induced immunity is weaker and less durable than natural.” —Clin Infect Dis (Shrestha et al.)
Scientists trying to reinfect people with the COVID-19 virus so they could test vaccines and treatments found high levels of immunity made it nearly impossible, according to results from the COVID-19 “Human Challenge” trials in the UK. As Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense put it, “The results show the power of natural immunity as compared to the many breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals … Any assertion that vaccination-based immunity is more powerful than natural immunity is complete lunacy—the acquired immune system is a beautiful thing and vaccination is a much less effective substitute.”
After years of denial, an NIH official has finally admitted that taxpayers funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. At long last, National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak admitted to Congress on May 16th that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the months and years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic.
Internal emails from the National Institute of Health show Dr. David Morens, Fauci’s senior advisor, was actively shielding certain communications from being accessible through FOIA requests. In Moren’s emails, acquired by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in Washington, he mentioned that certain topics, such as the Wuhan lab connection, should only be discussed on his personal Gmail account to avoid FOIA requests.
Loblaws and Sobeys’ parent companies are under investigation by Competition Bureau Canada for alleged anti-competitive conduct. The commissioner claims grocery giants’ designed their lease agreements to restrict other potential tenants and their activities, thus hampering competition in the grocery market.
The BC government has introduced legislation to prevent protests around schools. While the new legislation is aimed to “keep kids safe and focused on their education by preventing disruptive behaviour,” the BC government ironically continues to place social issues, such as gender identity, inside the classroom.
The EU’s European Council has followed the European Parliament in approving the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act” —an act that essentially legalizes biometric mass surveillance in the bloc. The AI Act will also permit many forms of emotion recognition—AI systems that claim to know what we are thinking.
A group of West Virginia female middle-schoolers who protested a transgender athlete’s participation in their track and field competition have been barred from future meets for defending their right to have only biological females participate in female-only events.
No evidence COVID-19 vaccines stopped transmission when authorized, Canadian Federal Government confirms. The Health Minister’s representative in the House of Commons has just confirmed that “at the time of initial authorization of the first COVID-19 vaccines … there was no reported evidence on the efficacy of the authorized COVID-19 vaccine to prevent asymptomatic infection, to reduce viral shedding, or to prevent transmission.” Despite this fact, public health messaging suggested that herd immunity was only achievable through mass vaccination.
US CDC officials had indeed found evidence that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines had caused multiple deaths before publicly claiming that there was no evidence linking the vaccines to any deaths, according to an internal file obtained via a FOIA request by The Epoch Times.
Patrick Provost, a professor and biochemist with 35 years of research experience in the areas of genomics, lipid nanoparticles, and RNA, has been fired from Quebec City’s Université Laval over his criticisms of the Covid-19 vaccine. Professor Provost’s firing stemmed from him stating that he believed the risks of COVID-19 vaccination in children outweigh the benefits because of the potential side-effects from mRNA vaccines.
After two cases in the US and another in Australia, US federal health officials are ramping up efforts to combat what they claim is the growing threat of H5N1 bird flu. The US Department of Health and Human Services has announced that officials are moving forward with a plan to produce 4.8 million doses of H5N1 avian flu vaccine for pandemic preparedness. FDA Commissioner Robert Califf warned that a potential bird flu pandemic could “be ten times worse” than COVID, despite the only two US cases of human bird flu presenting as pinkeye.
Pfizer Inc. has agreed to settle more than 10,000 lawsuit cases accusing the Pharma giant of hiding the cancer risks of its Zantac heartburn drug. The FDA confirmed that Zantac was carcinogenic in 2020 and ordered drugmakers to take all versions of the medicine off the market.
While Ontario does not cover most sleep apnea surgeries and many jaw surgeries, an Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery. A court has ruled Ontario must pay for a penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a person who identifies as neither fully female nor fully male. Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling.
Hypocrisy at its finest: Mark Zuckerberg, a vocal critic of “human-induced climate change,” just purchased a new $300 million, 287-foot mega yacht, powered by four massive diesel engines. Zuckerberg reportedly purchased the yacht, which requires a whopping $30 million a year in annual upkeep, as a 40th birthday present to himself.
The answers to these questions are frightening. Emails, documents, and federal contracts tell a dark story that is still dominating our lives. It’s time to cast a light on the shocking truth. Because only with the truth can we emerge from the darkness of this “pandemic” and take back the liberty stolen from us.
The bottom line: Many experts anticipate a coronavirus vaccine, once proven safe and effective, would be made as widely available as possible, and that developers aren't likely to seek big profits from it. Partial federal ownership could be a backstop if those assumptions don't bear out, but NIH isn't keen on stepping on industry's toes.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements
Anthony Fauci’s Hospital Protocols For Covid are Killing Thousands From the Land of Baloney is Dr. Death is a Mass Murderer and a Prolific Serial Killer.
COVID-X-24 Blood and Non Vaccines Blood and Secret Pedophile's Blood Bank U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dye2c-covid-19-blood-and-non-vaccines-blood-and-secret-pedophiles-blood-bank-u.s..html
Blood Feasting Pedophiles, Parasitic Monsters Literally and Predatory Feeding Off the 9.6 Million Children Gone Missing Each Year Around the World… Top Secret “Pedophile” has reverberated throughout America.
You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html
Once you see this you'll have no faith in these people again! The system-serving airheads that should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity like most politicians, oligarchs, globalists and most medias.
Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed
Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html
Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation.
Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ?
Gates from Hell - Like you Never Knew Him (Bill Gates) Before ? Corbett Report - https://rumble.com/v2afwv2-gates-from-hell-like-you-never-knew-him-bill-gates-before-corbett-report-w0.html
The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us.
Pedophile Bill Gates Is Lying To You On Vaccine Patent Protection # WO2020060606A1 - https://rumble.com/v2bvqos-pedophile-bill-gates-is-lying-to-you-on-vaccine-patent-protection-wo2020060.html
COVID-19 Vaccines Will Kill You? Animation What Happens If You Get Coronavirus Effect - https://rumble.com/v2dt6zk-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-you-animation-what-happens-if-you-get-coronavir.html
No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn immediate now.
Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html
World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html
The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good.
For the greater good refers to the benefit or betterment of the majority of people, especially at the cost of smaller or individual concerns. It is a general advantage that can only be gained by losing or harming something that is considered less important. Some wars are fought for the greater good. The cutbacks that a company must face will be difficult, but they are for the greater good.
-
23:28
What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?
20 days agoIts ALL Over Now ABC News Declares Kamala D. Harris Winner & Elected New 47th President
3.6K12 -
1:39:14
vivafrei
2 hours agoSoros Karma in New York! Tammy Duckwarth Spreads LIES About Tulsi Gabbard! Pennsylvania FLIPS & MORE
21.9K15 -
1:57:36
The Charlie Kirk Show
2 hours agoInside the Transition + The Bathroom Battle + Ban Pharma Ads? | Rep. Mace, Tucker, Carr | 11.21.24
55.2K33 -
59:20
The Dan Bongino Show
5 hours agoBitter CNN Goes After Me (Ep. 2375) - 11/21/2024
612K2.43K -
DVR
TheAlecLaceShow
2 hours agoGuests: Alex Marlow & Terry Schilling | Justice For Laken Riley | Russian ICBM | The Alec Lace Show
1.65K1 -
LIVE
Danny Haiphong
2 hours agoMARK SLEBODA & SCOTT RITTER: NATO ATTACKS RUSSIA, PUTIN FIRES ICBM WARNING SHOT AT UKRAINE—WW3 NEXT?
1,796 watching -
40:47
Dave Portnoy
5 hours agoThe Unnamed Show With Dave Portnoy, Kirk Minihane, Ryan Whitney - Episode 37
20.5K1 -
51:53
The Rubin Report
3 hours agoCrowd Shocked by Ben Affleck’s Unexpected Take on This Massive Change
53K39 -
2:07:25
Steven Crowder
5 hours agoBREAKING: Russia Launches ICBM for First Time in History - What Happens Next?
378K193 -
1:39:19
The Shannon Joy Show
6 hours ago🔥🔥While Americans Are Watching WWE Politics: Australia Is Ramping Up MANDATORY Digital ID🔥🔥
20.6K5