Clif High - Language and circumstances... With Space - Explorers'

Language and circumstances...
Don't let ignorant kids interact with Space ALiens.

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. How are you doing? Saturday, July 20th, 7.40 in the a.m. This is a talk about language and circumstances. So, it's been a while since I've done any of the audios or videos or anything. The circumstances of my life have... been radically altered by the progress of time. Anyway, at the end of last month,
a series of events occurred that have changed the direction and the circumstances under which I'm going to be conducting my life from this point forward. I don't want to go into detail. There's no point in getting into it. And within these circumstances that changed, there were assaults by stalkers and some damage as I'm fighting them.
I'm 71, so it's an issue. And that has impacted a lot of things, right? Anyway, in the future, I'm going to be doing some audio stuff, putting that out in that format because of the damage to my hands in the fight, etc. And I just am reluctant to type it.
I just don't want to write the book, right? It's very tedious to do that level of typing. Anyway, but I'm going to examine a lot of the ontological model and a... basic framework for a protocol to examine it and to make conclusions. It's extremely fascinating.
I've made some breakthroughs, which I'm not going to get into at the moment. I'm going to go on to some other stuff here, relatively more mundane, but we just need to get through it all. So, okay, so how do I want to get into this? So my forecast from months back about my description, really,
of the events of this past week since the 13th, It was pretty good, pretty accurate. All of the disputed stuff, the fact that we were in Indeed had it all recorded, but we didn't understand it. There was stuff that we were going to be arguing about for years and all of that. Indeed was the situation.
It did occur that way. We even had the UFO in a strange way. So you'll note that both Dick Allgaier's, in several instances within Dick Allgaier's future forecasting or future remote viewing group, they had UFOs. And in some cases, like Dick Allgaier, had directions, speed, relative size, all different kinds of things,
and they described it as though it was a UFO. In my data, it was a UFO. It was an unidentified flying object, because at the time that it showed up in the data, it was not identified. It is now. And so what I'm speaking of
is the now iconic photo of the lead slug flying past Trump's head being captured by the guy with the extremely high shutter speed setting, right? Like 8,000. frames per second or something in order to capture that. And he gets this photo that absent the, um, assassination attempt, it's, it's, uh, something speeding through the sky extremely rapidly. Okay.
And scale is not, um, uh, it was neither pertinent nor known. It was just an unidentified something in the sky. Right now, my data sets never, never had that as a, um, sky event okay there was the potential that we were going to be looking at
something from project blue beam and all of that kind of stuff but the the descriptions i've gotten of the event itself track pretty well with all the language i put out over the intervening months so you now have to understand the situation here that because i use the ontological model i'm able to extract stuff
from data that others are not not able to do um Okay, that data extraction has proven itself prescient. My inability to get the 13th versus the 15th correctly is just an artifact of the timing and the amount of values or the numeric values I've signed to specific words, which even so, a day and a half is pretty,
or two days is pretty close, right? And so it's like, you know, okay, I can say that that was a pretty good hit. Now, the... The language that is the, okay, so it's the ontological model that allows one to make sense out of things like psychicness, time, the progression of events, separation, isolation,
all of these things that don't make sense in any other way that, quote, science has abandoned since Boscovich. You got to go all the way back to Boscovich to get an accurate description of the etheric world. or our world seen through the etheric lens, okay? Because that's basically what we're doing.
We're discounting current modern science because it's a gritology view. But in any event, if you don't use that view, and this is pertinent in a second, but if you don't use the grit first, grit only, and grit always view of the Einsteinian collective,
then things make sense to you and are able to make more sense when you examine them with the idea of if this ontological model were extended, would that account for XYZ? And if so, how? And you can actually figure it all out.
Or at least get a close enough working approximation to be able, as I have, to make sense. accurate forecasts okay and so Dick Allgaier and his RV group are experiential forecasters. So in that sense, they're in the very long ancient tradition of shaman who would induce altered states in their minds.
He does as well, although without drugs, in order to retrieve information that is not... literally or generally available within the linear progression of time as our minds see it. And so in that sense, Dick Allgaier and his group, their history, their lineage goes back tens of thousands of years into the distant past in our
previous travels through the yuga. And so he is an experiential. He literally can look out. It's like... he sees, he walks along and he experiences and he sees the pile of change on the road, right? The nickels and dimes and quarters that someone has dropped. Okay, now my approach is not that. My approach is not experiential.
My approach would be akin to having a, like having a recording or a microphone and hearing a big pile of change being dropped and from that making inferences as to the amount of coins in their individual makeup, right? So in that sense, I'm an analyst, not an experiencer. Now, obviously, Dick Allgaier has the benefit,
his crew has the benefit of not having to invoke those mental filters to do the analysis and all of the fucking tedious work of it all, right? He experiences it and then he interprets it and tells you what they experienced. Obviously, again, going through his gray matter,
there will be differentiation between what his mind thinks it perceives and what it actually perceived relative to the thing he experienced. So just because, you know, it's the old thing about an elephant. If you're blind and you grab the elephant's balls, you're not knowing that there's a trunk on the other end, right? Right.
you're going to interpret it through your experience. So it can break down that way. And that's why they are amazingly accurate and also continuously a little bit wrong, a little bit off. Or that it is difficult for them pre-event, pre-manifestation, to determine the overall nature of the event. Just like with this last forecast where...
I pointed out everything that was going to happen on the 13th, but I was doing so from the effects that would manifest. All right. Not a description of the event itself, but rather how we would all be dealing with it afterwards, because that's what I have. The language describing our reactions, our emotions.
and the subsequent chain of actions that would occur from the event itself, but without really regard to the event itself. And here it makes sense. And while you would think it would be logical that there should be the word assassination all to hell and gone within the data pre-event, it doesn't work that way, okay?
Because the assassination is not a... The word assassination or assassination attempt as a phrase is not a descriptor of... It is a label. Labels are applied after the manifestation. Descriptors are that language that appears in my language field ahead of time from which I may, or in this instance,
may not be able to determine the nature of the event itself. And here you have the additional aspects of this particular event, which was the very sudden sharp spike up, and then all of the release language. At the time the release language is coming out, the amount of unknowns is significantly larger than the amount of knowns.
So the amount of descriptors going to this is an unknown aspect, but it has these characteristics vastly outnumbers the number of descriptors that went to this would occur. And here are the implications. So it is a very difficult task. Now, I'm not alibying the work involved, right?
I'm not saying, oh, it's just so difficult, I wasn't able to do that. I'm trying to tell you an aspect of the language in a very confusing situation that goes to how the process works. Even more so, it goes to how language and psychic leaking and psychic impression work within our reality.
Basically, one way to think about it would be that... We all had a psychic impression that there were some big, bad, juju magumbo coming, right? And we knew this juju magumbo was going to come on in and kick our guts and make our nads feel bad and there'd be anxiety and all of this kind of shit.
And that's why we're leaking it out of our psychicness. But we didn't know the nature of the juju magumbo because those people that were plotting the juju magumbo were deliberately doing so as secretly as they possibly could. So that adds to our issue. There's obviously emotive leaks from those people that trigger the people around them, et cetera,
et cetera. All this shit goes out in ripples, but they're not using language that we would be able to pick up. Now they may have, I don't have access to, you know, sweeping texts or internet emails or any of that, right? Actually,
my data stream is quite limited and I'm very proud of what I'm able to achieve with this very limited data stream. So in that sense, I'm very jealous of Dick Allgaier's remote viewing group because they do not have those limitations. Once they set their minds to this altered state, there are not those kinds of bandwidth limiting features.
And it makes it, in my opinion, a much superior process if you've got their appropriate minds involved. And that's the real key, of course. And then also, once you've got the appropriate minds involved, the way that this shit works, you've got to keep those minds tuned. They've got to work inside tuned bodies.
So one of these guys changing from one brand of vitamin C to something else, may induce all kinds of ripples in their thinking that was unanticipated, and it would affect their work just because of the biomolecular nature of that particular vitamin C over another one. I'm using that as a trivial example. But the point being,
it is the nature of the consistency and constancy of your body that allows you to do that work... in an accurate fashion with the consistent results that we all really need in this environment to work on. Okay, so that having been said,
Okay, so it is the nature of language itself that I explore as it expresses itself through humanity. So in that sense, I'm attempting to interact with or analyze the larger collective consciousness as it expresses itself through our individual consciousness. And so if one wanted to look at it a particular way,
we could think of humans as being the neural net bots that are being used to train an AI, and that our collective consciousness could be considered to be that AI training itself on itself. So somewhat circuitous, but nonetheless, it gives an idea of the... delicacy and the nuances involved in the process here.
So we're always going to be wrong. I'll always have big chunks of stuff that I miss simply because it's not manifesting in a way to be able to pick up in the data that streams into my bandwidth for this particular process. Okay, so acknowledging that wrongness,
probably the best way to look at these things at a practical level, if I was outside the process and was into this, I would read the shit that I write, and then I would join and follow Dick Allgaier's future forecasting group, and I would fuse them, right?
I would make a determination as to where the Dick Allgaier guys are all, where their little holes are in their process. and then see if those could be overlaid with the larger patterns that I come across, and it would present a much more accurate view, the fusion of the two.
Now, there's things we need to understand about language in very... Serious ways, right? Because we can use that to coordinate life on Earth and our exploration of the materium. And just by having the ontological view, just by understanding how universe is actually structured.
So now I'll tell you some secrets here, or not secrets, but some things that have happened in all of this process of the last month or so that I find interesting and that may benefit me by other people knowing ahead of time, right? So one of the things was that I was approached by...
a very large firm or a firm, a company, a corporation to buy my code. I was feeling really down as a result of all of the physical, deeply disturbing physical problems that I'm dealing with in my physical reality. And so I heard them out and listened to their offer. And then I investigated them.
Okay, it turns out they're Israelis. And they're really connected to the whole BlackRock crew and so on. All right. But they offered me an obscene amount of money. And then when I told them, piss off, I'm not interested in dollars, they came back with a big bucket of Bitcoin as an offer.
And so what I did was I didn't really want to sell to them, didn't want to fuck with them because of the... Actually, I would not have mind taking their big chunk of their big bucket of Bitcoin and in exchange for my code, but they wanted something else,
which is they wanted up to a year of my time to teach them how to use it. Okay, and then I discovered they were Israeli, and I knew instantly at that point that they would never be able to grasp the concepts that are inherent in the code,
and I would be working very hard for a year to fulfill my part of a contract should I have entered into it with them against a probability of failure just because of the way that their minds work. You have to understand that the Israelis are ritualists, okay?
They think that if you stack the grit in an appropriate way, you can get the golem to come alive. the Frankenstein to become alive if you just zap it with the appropriate energies. Okay, they do not grasp the ontological model, and their minds are hardened against it through ritual,
which deprives their minds of a flexibility and a freedom to consider other aspects of things. So it becomes something of an issue. So I made a test. So in my... test there i provided the the potential buyers uh with three examples uh of old uh
language right and the way it works i get this like less than 100 words usually on the order between 30 and 60 words that are the uh key encapsulate or key descriptors that encapsulate the core concept of a particular data set from which I was able to extract more information.
So I gave them the initial descriptors that showed me that the 2008 financial crash was coming and the nature that it would express I showed and I gave them the Language that I used for Blondes on Boats about the Costa Concordia sinking. And then one other one for Extreme Weather Events. And I said, okay, here's these things.
If you want to involve me in this and are asking for some level of time, I was not committing to a year, but that was what they were asking. Then I said, then you've got to show me that you have the ability somewhere within your organizations to suss this stuff out.
In other words, you know, let me see the nature of the minds I'm going to have to interact with. Give me an analysis of these three groups of language and what they point to. And I, you know, they worked at it. They had five days and they worked at it and then they came back and they missed
all three, 100% missed all three. And we're, you know, so it was a no-go. There was just, and it was a real good excuse for, at the time for me to just tell them, no, piss off, I'm not interested in dealing with you. I would sell you my code, but it's not going to aid you.
Your mind simply can't grasp or do the work that's necessary. This has to do with... The nature of language, how language itself functions in the mind and the brain. Okay, there's a big damn issue there with the brain itself. And the impact that that functioning has on the tools you use, your mind and your brain.
In other words... Hebrew is an extremely limited language. It's not only harsh and guttural in terms of how it is expressed, but it is a small corpus language. There's not hundreds of thousands of words in Hebrew. At the time the Bible was written, there were over 300,000 words in Greek,
while there were only 8,000 words that existed in Hebrew. All The nature of the structure of the Hebrew and how it is a primary language used for thinking, the nature of that structure is hierarchical and bottom-up, so to speak. So it forms certain structures and frameworks in your mind that are very difficult to overcome,
that is very difficult to step outside of and see around. Now, there are other things about language, and well, just as an aside, okay, so if we look at Greek at the time that the first Bible was written in Greek, so it was originally, all of the Bible was originally written in Greek,
including all of the Torah stories, right, in all of the various different forms. Bear in mind that there's over 1,300 versions of the Torah. Nowadays, we only have this one or two or three or nine, you know, not very many official versions, right? But there were family Torah, the same way we get family Bibles.
And many of those were historically able to exist up until like a couple hundred years ago when they were snatched up by the Elohim worship cult that made a deliberate decision to own what was known as the rag trade. which was the used books.
And they would buy all these books and keep them and not let them be resold. And so they were able to restrict history that way. Anyway, okay, so... We, in our current time, I call the space aliens that invaded the Elohim. That is a Hebrew word that is the Hebrew plural applied to the word El. Okay. And...
And that's a current name it's useful to use under the circumstances because of the appearance of it in the Torah. But here's the thing. Before we had a Hebrew Torah, so it was originally in Greek, then it was transliterated into Hebrew, and then from there it's transliterated back out to Greek, Latin, and English, and German, etc., etc.,
So it was this double transliteration that lost all of the nuance and technical aspects of the Bible of the Old Testament in the process of the Torah's creation. Now, we don't have any officialdom that's going to ever agree with me on any of this shit. And it's all deliberately done so that we have this ambiguity here.
and questions about all of these things and disputes okay so anyway the language at that time in ancient greek had an interesting feature to it that we don't acknowledge now as that's often overlooked by current modern linguists and that is that um So Hebrew at the time, Hebrew is an 8,000 word language, had no vowels.
The vowels are these little diacritic and subcritic marks that are made on the consonants. And it tells you by the position. But we don't know how it's actually pronounced. We don't know if they're pronouncing them as a long E, a soft E, an A, this kind of thing. Usually we can tell things like O's, right?
But in any event, so Greek, and that's a hidden assumption, in Hebrew that you need to know about in order to read the language effectively. Because there are some subtle differences. If there's this particular kind of a vowel indicator in this position, as opposed to that, it changes the meaning of the word. All right.
And so we find the same thing in ancient Greek, even with all of its 200 or 300,000 words, right? So many, many, many times the number of words in Greek at the time of the Bible than in Hebrew. And Hebrew was a very much restricted, constrained language and was really barely functional outside of its little niche,
which was the whole Babylonian money magic thing. and the ritualization of religion. Okay, so now that being said, in ancient Greek, the letter eta was prepended to almost all words that began with a vowel. So in Hebrew, they don't have the concept of a vowel beginning word, right? In Hindu, in the Hindi language,
we have the prepending of the sound A to mean the antithesis of whatever the rest of the word is. So if it's himsa, that means to harm or hurt. If you say ahimsa, that means to do no harm or do no hurt, right? That's the way the language worked.
There was a similar function in ancient Greece or ancient Greek, okay? And it was around the letter eta. which was pronounced as an aspirated H. So, if you don't know this, then you don't know how to express ancient Greek versus modern Greek. You would see it written with a particular vowel beginning the word,
and you would just start speaking the word at that vowel, and you not being... cognoscenti of the nature of the language at the time it was being used, you would not know to put that H sound in front of it. And so, because, all right, so the Elohim...
were as much as a bunch of fuckers to the Greeks and they harvested as many of the Greeks, many more of the Greeks than they did of the Hebrews, okay? And so they've been a problem to Germans, to Russians, to Chinese, everywhere.
There's very few places on the planet that did not suffer, that humanity did not suffer the Elohim. In... In ancient Greece, they knew these people as the El. Okay, so when the motherfuckers landed here and the humans had gotten the shit kicked out of them, they said, well, what do you want us to call you?
You know, hey, boss, what do you want us to call you? The Elohim said that we are El. Well, in ancient Greece, that's going to be prefaced by the aspirated H. It is from that affectation, from that aspect of the Greek language, that we get the word hell. Because that's how the Greeks would have pronounced it.
With the aspirated H, it would just be harder than I'm saying it. And following that would be the E-L. So hell is not a place. Hell is a description of the beings. That is how their name was said by the ancient Greeks. And so you would be in,
we took that as a physical place of maiming and torture and everything because that's what these motherfuckers did to humans. And that's all we ever as humans received from them. None of the Elohim are loving gods. None of them do anything other than cause pain, misery, and death and excruciating mind fucking problems for humans.
That's our history with them. The reason we have the word hell and all of its implications in all of the fucking books is because of that aspirated etta in front of the L. So they were called hell by the ancient Greeks, right? Anyway, we have to examine and understand the limitations of the language of
that we use to express our thoughts and also the constraints that the language itself puts on our thoughts in order to do a lot of this kind of work. Now, Dick Allgaier, as I say, he does not. He can just render it in our current language and be done with it because of the
experiential nature of his view into the future there, right? So... Hang on a second. Let's see. All right. So anyway, so the firm, the company, never did get their stuff together, and I broke off a negotiation with them because it's just not possible. It's just a waste of my time trying to get them to understand how language
expresses itself through humans and what it means relative to time. And from that viewpoint... you know it was just it was a non-starter and this is good I didn't want to fuck with him and it turns out the circumstances that I had Thought might require the money. Do not.
Okay, so I don't really need to worry about that particular aspect of things here. Basically, it's like, oh, okay, you know, I've got sufficient resources and good. I'm not for hire. I've got other work I want to do. Now, in the future, my circumstances are such that I won't be doing the driving.
I won't be doing those driving talks. I'll have to do some level of driving, but... I'll be usually traveling with other people. It won't be convenient to do them. I will be doing some audio projects here around the ontological model and what we
can learn from it over these next weeks and stuff as I evolve into whatever the new format of my life will take. So this is like unknown, you know, parts unknown. So anyway, that's pretty much it for now. And I did want to say, though, that in the data sets that were around for
the immediacy data for this past week. I also have hints in that data, and I haven't explored it. It's just been a hellacious, what, 28 or 29 days. Anyway, there are hints in the data set that at least At some point here in the future, maybe two months, three months, something like that,
we'll start to see the cessation of these fucktards that are out there ripping people off with all of their QFS and all this other Nassara, Gassara horseshit. So the data sets are saying that the scammers are going to face retribution. um in places like england they're gonna have picked into a wrong community so to
speak and their people will be uh disappeared uh for the qfs and the nasara kind of uh scams right and the zimbabwe rv and all of that sort of horse shit um And this will be good. These guys have got to stop this. They're ripping people off. There's a fellow I learned about.
There's a bunch of them, actually. But there was one guy I learned about that charges $10,000 to sit and interview you over a weekend for practice for your supposed interview at the bank to claim your Nasara wealth. And it's like, holy shit. People are willing to pay big money to have someone come on in and abuse them
mentally and look at their, quote, plans. And there's, you know, it's a scam. And then the scam, in order to get your wealth to become so mega wealthy that you can buy Montana, you've got to have some plan for helping some, you know, Helpless group somewhere. And it's like, holy shit.
And of course, now bear in mind, QFS, Nasara, Gasara, they're all fiat schemes. They're all central bank schemes, right? And they're basically, they're ripping you off for the deep state. You know, there are scams organized and run out of Israel. Anyway, though, so the data sets are showing that there's going to be comeuppance. You know,
no compensation for having been ripped off by the guys, but at least you'll see them go to jail or suddenly disappear and never be found or suddenly disappear and then turn up floatering. And upon somewhere like Obama's chef a year later, that sort of thing. Right.
So a lot of the scammers are going to get theirs on this business. As I say, the interesting ones to me are the really, you know, people that really fuck up and get into the wrong community with this scam. in England and you know it's going to end badly for them and you know they deserve
it there's just no getting around that so that's coming on up in our very near future here the beginning of it it'll take a long time to go through and clean up all of this bullshit and put the social order in a correct and operating fashion and I'll do some more
discussions of that because a lot of it, of course, is going to involve language. One of the interesting things for me about all of this is that the data sets are now starting to pop up supporting sets indicating the emergence of our sci-fi world. through this period of chaos and troubles, and in so doing,
are pointing out the vast numbers of new forms of opportunity that will be available to humans. So we're finally going to just shit can the whole Jew dystopia thing, right? Hopefully somebody will buy Netflix and shut it down. Get rid of all that dystopia, propaganda, Elohim worship cult horseshit.
But in any event, though, we're emerging out of it as an overall world. So when Trump comes on in and globalism starts dying, bear in mind, globalism is Elohim worship cult. And so the Elohim worship cult is going down, and we will drag out all of the tendrils of... Language control and everything else,
it's been put on the social order as a result of those motherfuckers. And it will be good. And then we'll have to deal with the space aliens. But hey, then the adults will be in charge and we'll get a much better approach to this because we'll understand that the nature of contact is the ultimate expression of
contention within ourselves, between ourselves and universe, between ourselves and us. those with whom we would be in contention. That's very complicated shit, dude. And this is why we've got to have the adults here is because these gritologists do not have a fucking clue. So anyway, the world will be better in many regards,
but it's going to take us a long time to clean it all out. Talk to you later.
Aether Pirates of the Matterium!
clif’s Newsletter Podcast
Woo, down, dirty, deep WOO

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/language-and-circumstances?publication_id=681568&post_id=146821860&r=1ldhti&triedRedirect=true

Clif_High

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej8hFPBuII0