ENG-Anon: "Arthur Koestler - The Zealot" by Christopher Hitchens

In our "Truther" community, people often talk about the "Khazars" or, thanks to the coining of the term by Ben Fulford, the "Khazarian Mafia", or "KM". Prior to that, there was talk of the Khazars by the well-known independent filmmakers Janet Ossebaard and Cynthia Koeter, who spoke about the Khazars in their popular, multi-part documentaries "The Fall of the Cabal" and "Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal". Prior to that, the torchbearer of the idea of "Khazaria" was drawn out by Arthur Koestler, in his well-known book "The Thirteenth Tribe". As Khazaria is contained to a large extend by present-day Ukraine and a small part of southern Russia (the territories are historically contested), older and more accurate history of what took place in Khazaria may well reside today in Russia. I believe Russia will have, in its upcoming contributions to Disclosure (what they uncovered in Ukraine and ancient history - note they also have the ancient territory that was Tartaria in present-day Siberia) some pretty daming information, about "who ran the world" until recently. It is nice to feel justified and safe to use that term in its past tense now.

As I read this essay, I am fascinated by a couple of key points:

1. Hitchens does ridicule Koestler, for being a kind of conspiracy theorist who abandoned reason for many far-flung theory flights of fancy. This is a curious line for a man who exposed the evil trio of Henry Kissinger, Mother Teresa and The Clintons (Bill and Hillary Clinton). He even accuses Koestler of being played for a sucker by Uri Geller. As a man who famously squared off against the Roman Catholic Church in a public debate that aired on British national television (the event was hosted by anchorwoman Zeinab Badawi, and Hitchens's partner for the event for Stephen Fry, no less), as well as exposed the aforementioned individuals as evil, I do not think that this essay was some sort of a hit piece on Koestler - a man who squared off against the present-day Khazars; it was simply ignorance of a quadrant of European history that has been left, purposely, vague
2. I find it curious that Koestler "committed suicide" and chose to take his wife with him (she committed suicide alongside him). I do not believe this story., for the simple reason of the bear he prodded. Hitchens alleges depression on the side of Koestler, and this could be true. I am questioning whether this was a genuine suicide, or whether he was "encouraged" and it was made to appear what they say it was. The main reason for my dubiousness, is that Hitchens cited David Cesarani's investigation into Koestler. I do not trust DC one centimeter. Note to self - do not cite cabal-based hacks to prop up your argument, and way before that, do not be blinded to the truth due to your camp Liberalism (this irritated me about Christopher - hence he was a liberal smartass, he just was)
3. Notice the monstrous faux-pas made by Hitchens (at approx the 10:00 mark) about no connection between Palestine and the Ashkenazi Jews. Well, sorry Christopher, you stepped in it there. We have, of course, the Balfour Declaration, and the fact that this now infamous document is addressed to Lord Rothschild. From there, the Rothschild lineage can be easily traced back to Khazaria (thank you Ben Fulford and the late Barry Chamish; The latter was "suicided" and the former was attempted to be "suicided", so much for investigative journalism being good, safe employment). Hence my "WTF" graphic along with Captain Picard, doing his famous "face palm". I just love it!