Are Democrats In The Position To Never Need Alternate Electors?

5 months ago
118

What if Trump gets elected and he prosecutes them? When was the last time we got a win? There are sound clips out there but when has a hearing been a win for us.
We have June 27, the debate, July 11, the sentencing will Trump go to jail, July 15, the RNC convention the day Trump is supposed to receive the nomination at the convention.
Questions: What is Nikki Haley doing? Why is Kemp going to the convention? Who is working behind the scenes on the bubble vote (8%)? Who is concerned?
We won in 2016, they say you lost in 2020, now we are going into 2024. There are 5 states that have "fake" elector cases, GA (3), MI, NV, AZ, WI. They call them the fake electors, but go look up the Hawaii case in the Nixon Kennedy election. When the election is close that is a date the electors meet, it is all in a sequence for Jan 6 when the electoral college is confirmed. and if you have a legal challenge to an election and if you overturn the result then your electors have to be in place otherwise if you win the challenge and the electors are not in place it will be useless. So all the challenges to the 2020 election these electors are in place for the legal challenges to the 2020 election. AZ is once more a 10K vote state, if you believe that the first time, and you end up with challenges and you have to put your electors together for the challenge legally. Would you do it? knowing they will financially destroy you.
There are SOS and governors in place that will not certify an election if Trump wins. The WI governor will not accept the election if Trump wins.
we don't want to overturn the results, we just want to know the results.
What if Democrats have to use alternate electors. right now the democrats are going after them as though they never have to use this system. Why would you do this if may Trump wins by 10K votes and democrats have to challenge it in court. would they just do it to say they did it the legal way? all of the deep state media has no problem just glossing over anything and just moving on. They have no problem ignoring and moving on.
Are they in the position that they don't have a need to ever use the alternate electors?
Scott McAfee was the IG of the state of GA, and when he was ready for the next move on the investigation of the 2020 election. Kemp swoops in to move him to superior court in Fulton county. kemp did you know that Fani was going to bring the racketeering case in Fulton county. McAfee gets the Nathan Wade case. McAfee dismissed Wade but not Fani. McAfee just went through a primary election and held a fundraiser and took a picture with Roy Barnes (last democrat governor) and Brian Kemp. McAfee gives the approval to move the case to the appeals court. the appeal panel on October 4th. they don't look at the case again, they only review McAfee's conclusion. judges don't overturn a judge's conclusion. it is possible but not likely. if they overturn the case, they will say that it is election interference. don't get all excited about October. The only thing they would be doing if they dismissed Fani is taking her off the case. On Oct 4 early voting is ready to start, the Fulton county DA race, republican courtney cramer is all hell will get ripped wide open that the election was altered against Fani willis.
when Merrick Garland is saying that he will not be intimidated. Matthew Colangelo is the 3rd rank under Garland to leave the DOJ and takes a position in the Manhattan DA office to prosecute Trump.

Loading comments...