No Logic in Morocco, nor citizenship!
Logic is the study of correct reasoning. It includes both formal and informal logic. Formal logic is the study of deductively valid inferences or logical truths. It examines how conclusions follow from premises due to the structure of arguments alone, independent of their topic and content. Informal logic is associated with informal fallacies, critical thinking, and argumentation theory. It examines arguments expressed in natural language while formal logic uses formal language. When used as a countable noun, the term "a logic" refers to a logical formal system that articulates a proof system. Logic plays a central role in many fields, such as philosophy, mathematics, computer science, and linguistics.
Logic studies arguments, which consist of a set of premises together with a conclusion. An example is the argument from the premises "it's Sunday" and "if it's Sunday then I don't have to work" to the conclusion "I don't have to work".[1] Premises and conclusions express propositions or claims that can be true or false. An important feature of propositions is their internal structure. For example, complex propositions are made up of simpler propositions linked by logical vocabulary like
∧{\displaystyle \land } (and) or
→{\displaystyle \to } (if...then). Simple propositions also have parts, like "Sunday" or "work" in the example. The truth of a proposition usually depends on the meanings of all of its parts. However, this is not the case for logically true propositions. They are true only because of their logical structure independent of the specific meanings of the individual parts.
Arguments can be either correct or incorrect. An argument is correct if its premises support its conclusion. Deductive arguments have the strongest form of support: if their premises are true then their conclusion must also be true. This is not the case for ampliative arguments, which arrive at genuinely new information not found in the premises. Many arguments in everyday discourse and the sciences are ampliative arguments. They are divided into inductive and abductive arguments. Inductive arguments are statistical generalizations, such as inferring that all ravens are black based on many individual observations of black ravens.[2] Abductive arguments are inferences to the best explanation, for example, when a doctor concludes that a patient has a certain disease which explains the symptoms they suffer.[3] Arguments that fall short of the standards of correct reasoning often embody fallacies. Systems of logic are theoretical frameworks for assessing the correctness of arguments.
-
4:11
Nitrocross
1 day agoThe Edge with Tanner Foust | Episode 1
95.4K7 -
40:33
Alexis Wilkins
1 day agoBetween the Headlines with Alexis Wilkins: Eric Adams, Tariffs, Nathan Wade MISSING & more
65.3K13 -
1:16:08
Steve-O's Wild Ride! Podcast
2 days ago $2.11 earnedBrandon Novak and Steve-O Avoid Discussion Of Sobriety - Wildride #234
71.2K19 -
4:15:30
GamerGril
18 hours agoWHORDE MASTER RETURNS | DAYS GONE
60.2K11 -
16:14:02
Right Side Broadcasting Network
3 days agoLIVE REPLAY: President Trump Delivers Remarks in Prairie du Chien, WI - 9/28/24
395K182 -
2:59:48
Jewels Jones Live ®
1 day ago“TARGETING TRUMP’S LIFE” | A Political Rendezvous - Ep. 93
129K39 -
21:20
MYLUNCHBREAK CHANNEL PAGE
21 hours agoThe Palace in Dallas?
121K58 -
59:56
Trumpet Daily
1 day ago $13.48 earnedSwooning for Kamala Didn’t Work - Trumpet Daily | Sept. 27, 2024
97.8K50 -
1:05:58
Tate Speech by Andrew Tate
21 hours agoPETER PAN PEANUT BUTTER ALERT | EPISODE 11
222K134 -
26:51
Michael Franzese
1 day agoThe Moment That Changed My Life Forever...
117K36