Premium Only Content
Scotland comes clean
If you would like to donate to the work in New Hope Children’s Centre, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin.
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL
Adam Stachura- Director of AGE Scotland
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0214-000001.pdf
As an example, somebody got in touch with us later on in 2020 who was concerned about their grandfather who is a veteran.
We understand from this exchange that
paramedics arrived at his door one day and they handed him a bit of paper and said, "you need to keep this by your bed".
It was a DNACPR decision document or slip.
The slip was signed by a clinician that said discussion had been had with patient and reason was just two words "communication difficulties".
(Presumably, linked to his hearing loss).
In this instance the DNACPR was not about them having any condition that would mean there is substantial or significant underlying health
condition, which would be challenging if they contracted COVID;
they were being written off because it was hard to communicate with them.
Even if it was the case that someone might face difficulties if they contracted COVID-19, why on earth is there a pre-emptive DNACPR?
And particularly so with no discussion or any form of dignified process for the
recipient.
…. we had a sense that this was also be happening in care homes, where all residents were having DNACPR decisions issued in a blanket manner,
not on an individual basis.
I heard of examples where there were cases of COVID in care homes, a medical response was not forthcoming.
COVID was simply going to go through the care home and there was not the resources to help everyone.
And it would be said that "we're not transferring you to hospital because you're in a sort of a safe
place.
We'll try and manage your condition as best we can in the care home environment".
We also found examples of people who upon leaving hospital found DNACPR decisions in their discharge papers without any discussion having
been had with them.
The box was ticked which said they had had a
discussion, where in fact none was.
It was the end of May 2020, I think, when it was becoming apparent that there were so many of these instances.
Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj
-
25:16
Dr. John Campbell
11 days agoCancer concerns from synthetic DNA
21.8K146 -
1:03:02
Russell Brand
2 hours agoDrones Over New Jersey: Why Is the Government Being So Quiet? - SF515
23.1K138 -
LIVE
Ben Shapiro
50 minutes agoEp. 2106 - TRUMP’S WORLD: Trudeau to RESIGN?! Germany Moves RIGHT?!
3,513 watching -
LIVE
hambinooo
3 hours agoBRAND NEW AWESOME FPS GAME
173 watching -
LIVE
SoundBoardLord
3 hours agoROAD TO 350!!! MARVEL RIVALS & ZOMBIES w/ Friends!
252 watching -
12:54
BlackDiamondGunsandGear
3 hours ago $0.02 earnedSpringfield Echelon: Game-Changer or Gimmick?
59 -
LIVE
ROSE UNPLUGGED
18 hours agoPromising Signs of Revival
25 watching -
LIVE
The Dana Show with Dana Loesch
1 hour agoNEW DETAILS EMERGE IN WISCONSIN SCHOOL SHOOTING | The Dana Show LIVE On Rumble!
902 watching -
31:00
Grant Stinchfield
1 hour ago $1.42 earnedExposed: COVID Shots Loaded with Contaminated DNA
-
LIVE
TheAlecLaceShow
1 hour agoGuest: Rep. Warren Davidson | Trump Presser | NJ Drones | Judge Merchan denial | The Alec Lace Show
114 watching