Grifters & Extortionists: a Trip Inside the Testimony of Michael Cohen in Memory Lane -VivaBarnes

5 months ago
537

Mike Cohen Extorted & Secretly Recorded his Client; Trump the Victim is being Prosecuted. Earlier podcast on this that Barnes referenced:
https://rumble.com/v4s71li-vivabarnes-428-david-pecker-extorted-trump-wcohen-avenatti-to-testify-for-t.html

These ones were after the Cohen direct, which Viva calls Day 14 and Gouveia Day 16. Barnes describes the courtroom: "These are extortionists, thieves & blackmailers disguised as lawyers, reporters, investigators & advocates."

Barnes' theory on why Trump hired Cohen, "he was always looking for a Ray Cohn."

In the full video Barnes lays into this guy Brenden Dilley over the RFK Jr. stuff: Trump Truthed that any "supposed conservative" who promotes RFK, you can assume he was paid to. I'll respond since I post many Barnes videos. He was who I thought of when I read Trump's post, don't know anyone else pushing RFK.

I found this background about Dilley
https://web.archive.org/web/20231214201052/https://dnyuz.com/2023/12/13/inside-the-troll-army-waging-trumps-online-campaign/

Who knows if Barnes was paid for his RFK position, but Trump said you can assume he did, and Dilley followed that, and Barnes is hitting him back but it's all a character attack. I don't agree with this kind of criticism but I understand he had to say something, if he took the money or not.

Going back to RFK, look at his positions besides on vaccines and yes, he's a Marxist or he'll say what they want him to so he can play the game. Trump will sink him with conservatives and that's what this is about: who RFK will take votes from in 2024, Biden or Trump.

I like Barnes' legal takes and I'll keep sharing them, don't care what he says about RFK or Trump's lawyers although I don't trust it, but no one comes to this channel for that I don't think.

Generally I don't take positions on e-drama. Public actors take strategic positions to influence group behavior rather than to share their inner thoughts, and if you're not "read in" you won't know the purpose or what they really think. For example, Pompeo could be black hat or white. If you could tell which, then so could the side he isn't on. I'm fine not knowing who all the good/bad guys are, in fact I don't have a choice, nor a "need to know." This is the way to follow news & not get "sucked in" by information ops.

Loading comments...