Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d86b/7d86b7bc84e9b3c5a51f9e578eea81371fba3423" alt="Dem Rep. Jerry Nadler Reads "The People" Right Out Of The Second Amendment"
Dem Rep. Jerry Nadler Reads "The People" Right Out Of The Second Amendment
There are times when you can quote parts of something, omit a bit in the middle, and not really change the meaning. Those middle parts are often superfluous to the meaning and so they can be omitted without a problem. But if someone does that, they need to be prepared to be challenged. After all, in many other cases, removing something from the middle can drastically change the meaning of the quote. Why am I talking about quotes and omitting a few words? Because words matter, and in something like the Second Amendment, there are two words that are vital to correctly understanding what it means. Those words are "the people." Yet Rep. Jerry Nadler doesn't seem to think they're all that important. Rep. Jerry Nadler reads “the People” right out of the Second Amendment. 😱 ❌“A well regulated Militia being necessary for the security of a free State, the right to bear Arms shall not be infringed.” ❌
Note that Nadler specifically says the word "quote" before beginning to recite most of the Second Amendment. Yet by omitted "the people," he changed everything. See, Nadler is, in fact, correct that the Founding Fathers had little trust in standing armies. They did see them as tools of tyranny--standing armies were often used domestically in those days--and they wanted the United States to have a militia instead. But the gist of what Nadler is suggesting is that they wanted the states to have militias. The phrase "the people" is a key giveaway that while they saw militias as being essential to American security, they saw it as the people's right to keep and bear arms so they could serve as militia. It's why the right is an individual one. Nadler's omission wasn't likely to be a simple mistake. In fact, the folks over at American Greatness are positive it's not.
The omission of the crucial words “of the people” in the Congressman’s reading of the Second Amendment is more than a politician’s linguistic slip. By deliberately leaving out the correct verbiage, Nadler radically alters the original meaning of the amendment which limits the power of government to infringe upon an individual right of the people to keep and bear arms.
• More at: Bearing Arms - Nadler Omits Key Part Of Second Amendment in 'Quote'
https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2024/05/09/nadler-omits-key-part-of-second-amendment-in-quote-n1224843
American Greatness: Rep. Nadler Omits “the people” From the Second Amendment
https://amgreatness.com/2024/05/08/rep-nadler-omits-the-people-from-the-second-amendment/
-
5:23
NewsVids
12 hours agoEx Biden Aide Gives Entire Administration Up Spilling Some Serious Tea About GASLIGHTING Americans
66 -
2:23:02
Badlands Media
20 hours agoThe Liberty Den Ep. 133
69.9K31 -
2:05:41
TimcastIRL
7 hours agoTrump SLAMS Ukraine President In TENSE WH Meeting, The War MAY END w/ Rob Smith | Timcast IRL
157K84 -
10:31:05
Dr Disrespect
15 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - PGA TOUR 2K25 LAUNCH DAY
189K28 -
2:30:04
Laura Loomer
6 hours agoEP105: MISSING: The Epstein Files
64.3K37 -
1:46:14
Kim Iversen
7 hours agoTrump to Zelenskyy: 'You're Gambling with World War III'
74.8K112 -
55:28
Glenn Greenwald
9 hours agoGlenn Reacts to Trump-Zelensky Exchange and Takes Q&A from our Members | SYSTEM UPDATE #415
120K201 -
4:26:54
Nerdrotic
11 hours ago $36.13 earnedMarvel PANIC MODE! Kathleen Kennedy GONE?! Hollywood DEI Dead | Friday Night Tights 342 Nick Freitas
133K37 -
1:30:03
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoZelensky Fail... God Called IT!; From Prison to the White House: Angela Stanton King’s Unbelievable Redemption Story | FOC Show
50.7K6 -
1:06:14
IsaacButterfield
11 hours ago $2.18 earnedFree Speech Is Dead | Did Trump Go Too Far? | Sexist Job
44.4K18