The perils of Historical Revisionism and Free Speech | David Irving

7 months ago
2.69K

Repost from 23 April 2024 | David Irving delves into the perils of historical revisionism and free speech. He discusses his legal skirmishes, conflicts with Jewish organizations, and allegations ranging from anti-Semitism to terror links, all unsupported by solid evidence. He highlights how his work and the debate on established narratives are stifled and emphasizes the urgent need for greater tolerance and openness in historical discourse.

——Outline:——————
🕞▸00:00 ➤ Introduction to the Assault on Free Speech
🕞▸01:20 ➤ The Making of a BBC Documentary on Free Speech
🕞▸03:22 ➤ Controversial Conditions for Filming at Auschwitz
🕞▸04:43 ➤ Banned from Auschwitz: A Historian's Dilemma
🕞▸06:14 ➤ Challenging Historical Narratives and Legal Battles
🕞▸10:45 ➤ The Persecution of Revisionist Voices in Germany
🕞▸18:16 ➤ A Personal Encounter with Anti-Semitism Allegations
🕞▸22:45 ➤ Questioning Historical Narratives and Societal Perceptions
🕞▸27:23 ➤ The Swiss Gold Controversy and Perceptions of Greed
🕞▸28:04 ➤ Exposing Financial Exploits and Historical Distortions
🕞▸28:58 ➤ The Controversy Over Unclaimed Swiss Bank Accounts
🕞▸30:44 ➤ Art Restitution: The Battle Over Cultural Heritage
🕞▸31:23 ➤ Insurance Claims and Holocaust Remembrance
🕞▸32:07 ➤ The Power of the Holocaust Narrative in Legal and Financial Arenas
🕞▸38:58 ➤ The Struggle for Control: Media, Publishing, and the Internet
🕞▸46:25 ➤ Legal Battles and the Fight for Historical Accuracy
🕞▸58:02 ➤ Concluding Reflections on Freedom and Historical Inquiry

———source:————————————————————
• Twitter / X: 👉 https://twitter.com/irving_books/status/1782907153298157598

——— ➤✝️ "Page Chronicles" Channel & Operator |▸⚠️ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMERS———
📌 I do not own the ©️ Copyright / Licensing to this content but it is posted Under:
► Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

☕️ Buy me a coffee: 👉 https://www.buymeacoffee.com/pagechronicles
🐦Page Chronicles X/Twitter: 👉 https://twitter.com/HelperPage
• Telegram: 👉 https://t.me/pagechronicles

Community Guidelines Disclaimer: This video's point of view and purpose is not to bully or harass anybody but to share opinions and thoughts with like-minded individuals curious about this subject to encourage conversation and awareness.

Loading comments...