Newspaper interview -5 Agent's raid womans home -No Warrant
9:59

Newspaper interview -5 Agent's raid womans home -No Warrant

9 months ago
581

39,655 views Apr 8, 2010
Going too slow in an alley with out of state license plates is not a crime..
... however, men in uniforms with guns who beat a man , threatening his life and 'framing him' to cover for a gang of thugs who are acting under 'color of law' , ARE very serious CRIMES!!
...Who is going to stand up for their own private home against BIG BANKERS (and their HIGH POWERED ATTORNEYS trying to STEAL it by LYING), if not ME?
...see the raw footage I shot of 5 Agents busting in my home.. parts 1 and 2.. plus go to the more info for news links
...Research "Lords of Bakersfield" and WitchHunt, the documentary narrated by Sean Penn about the corrupt alleged' officials in Kern County and Bakersfield
*******************
NOTICE and WARNING!
Ignorance of the LAW is no excuse!
.....I am a sovereign sentient being and I am exercising my lawful and unalienable rite-of-way to move freely upon the common roads via my private carriage and am not subject to any foreign jurisdiction outside of my sovereign jurisdiction. I am not engaged in any commercial activity, ie: driving, traffic, transport, business, or any other privileged, licensed or criminal activity.
...An unconstitutional legislative enactment, through law in form, is in fact not law at all. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 442.
Unless you have presented a warrant which is signed by a judge stating the cause of action and the nature of cause and accompanied by a sworn complaint by an injured party under penalty of perjury, then you have unlawfully seized me and I now have reasonable suspicion to believe you are committing a crime,
You lack any and all jurisdiction and are committing crimes under USC Title 18, for impersonating, kidnapping, involuntary servitude, false imprisonment, slavery, peonage, embezzlement, negligence, and other crimes which are punishable by fines and up to 14 years imprisonment for each crime.
I have every right to use equal or greater force to defend myself and my private property from unlawful acts forced upon me under color of law. see - (John Bad Elk v. U S, 177 U.S. 529 - 1900)

18 U.S.C. § 31 : US Code - Definitions
(6) Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other... for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10) The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration,... in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
*****************
....Law under Common-Law is not law unless a common/ordinary person can under stand it, that's the essence of Common-Law. The due-process clause of the Constitution mandates that regular people must be able to understand the law, if they can't then it is not law!
...In other word's you do not need a lawyer or a judge to understand the law. The construct of Trial By Jury relies entirely on this principle that We The People are completely able to understand the law. Samuel Chase, Supreme Court Justice and signer of the Declaration of Independence said: "The jury has the Right to judge both the law and the facts". And also keep in mind that he also said that "either we all hang together, or we most assuredly will all hang separately".
****************
The CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Article 1 section 9 says....
..Every ]man and woman] may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the ]freedom] of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions on indictments for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to a jury of 'peers' ; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libellous is true, and was published with good motives the man or woman shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the truth.
...Of course the judges, lawyers and DA's do not want you to realize that we the people determine the matters at law, that way they can dupe you into believing that the law says something that it does not say and they can charge you exorbitant fees to 'understand the law'.

Origional URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbQNqBjkcuU&list=PLk-BtqHWkD-41n9APxfE3tmUHoqpQFUWt&index=3

Loading comments...