Pro-aborts have no logic

Biologically, life begins at fertilization, when a whole, individuated, genetically distinct living human organism is formed. This is the only point at which human life begins, and as such, it is the only consistently logical and moral point at which human life should matter. It should matter the moment it comes into existence. Everything else is arbitrary and a very slippery slope slope.

If you say it “becomes human” at 6 months, what about 5 months, 3 weeks, and 6 days? Is it moral to kill at that point, even though in just one more day, it’ll “become human.” If you say 15 weeks is when we should cut off abortion, what about 14 weeks and 6 days? That’s ok? That’s moral? That’s not murder? That’s not a human life?

And no matter where you draw the line (and rest assured, pro-abortion activists can never seem to agree on where to draw it), you’ll always run into that problem. What about just before—the moments, the hours, the day just before—where you arbitrarily the line?

This is part of why pro-abortion activists can’t agree, whereas pro-life activists do—because the former is basing everything on emotions and personal feelings and outrage, whereas the latter is basing everything on science and reality and logical and moral consistency.

Follow me on INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/nataliejeanbeisner

TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/NJBeisner

TRUTH SOCIAL: https://truthsocial.com/@NatalieJeanBeisner

RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/NatalieBeisner

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/nataliejeanbeisner