Premium Only Content
Warning Shots Legal in Ohio? (Defense Attorney Explains)
#ohiowarningshots #ohiogunlaw #warningshots #potentiallycriminal
Warning shots are typically frowned upon by Defense Attorneys and Self-Defense instructors as it is the application of deadly force without the fear of imminent death or serious bodily harm. Usually, courts bar a defendant from asserting a claim of self-defense in cases where they fired a warning shot, but the Supreme Court of Ohio disagreed in their decision for State v. Wilson.
Let's take a look at what this means and whether making warning shots is a good idea now.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCH
https://potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com
Contact
* Email - potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096
Links
*Locals - https://potentiallycriminal.locals.com
*Rumble - https://rumble.com/PotentiallyCriminal
*Odysee - https://odysee.com/@PotentiallyCriminal
*Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/potentially_criminal
*BitChute - https://bitchute.com/potentially_criminal/
*Discord - https://discord.gg/5VyZZNHk
*Website - www.seanpmartinlaw.com
Support
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.
All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5660283745075200
-
2:22:37
Potentially Criminal
4 days ago $0.15 earned9/11 Plea Deals on Hold, Inmates reject Biden Clemency, Trump Sentencing Tomorrow, and more!
4521 -
18:14
Neil McCoy-Ward
20 hours agoThe European Union Is Getting Worse By The Day… (Now Germany 🇩🇪 Is In Big Trouble)
1.43K5 -
14:06
Gun Owners Of America
15 hours agoTaking A Look At Pam Bondi's Mixed Record On Guns
9832 -
7:44
Tactical Advisor
16 hours agoBest Budget Benelli Shotgun | Orthos v Panzer Arms
1.06K -
6:09
BIG NEM
8 hours agoThe Dark Truth About My Balkan Uncle's Past
6481 -
52:06
Uncommon Sense In Current Times
18 hours ago"Gerrymandering Markets: A Deep Dive with Robert Bork Jr. into Biden's Antitrust Agenda"
853 -
1:02:49
The Tom Renz Show
11 hours agoThe Democrats LA Fires & COVID Grand Jury
1.68K -
47:49
PMG
15 hours ago $0.02 earned"There Ain’t No Grace in It! What to do when you’re worn out!"
1.49K1 -
3:19:06
FreshandFit
6 hours agoAnnoying HOES Kicked Off After HEATED Debate On Rape Culture!
62.1K52 -
57:00
PMG
15 hours ago $10.86 earned"Terror Attacks or False Flags? IT DOESN'T ADD UP!!!"
37.4K12