Ohio Supreme Court Declares Warning Shots Can Be Lawful Self-Defense (Part 2)

Today I read the DISSENT in OH v. Wilson!

Ohio man Tyler Wilson got into a gas station verbal argument with one Billy Reffet. The argument escalated to the point that Wilson felt obliged to fire warning shots into the night sky, claiming he'd intended to merely frighten Reffet off, rather than to harm him.

Wilson would be charged with attempted murder and felonious assault. At trial he attempted to raise the legal defense of self-defense, but the trial judge rejected that request on the grounds that Wilson himself said he merely intended to frighten Reffet, not actually use force against him.

Wilson would be convicted, and appealed.

Last week the Ohio Supreme Court not only agreed that warning shots could qualify as lawful self-defense, but rather unusually also found that Wilson's lawyer had been constitutionally ineffective at trial.

Join us for our reading and analysis of Ohio v. Wilson!

BECOME A LAW OF SELF DEFENSE EXPERT IN ONE DAY!

Twice a year Attorney Andrew Branca hosts a LIVE full-day Law of Self Defense Advanced Webinar--and one of those rare opportunities is coming up on Saturday, April 20, 2024.

Learn how to be HARD TO CONVICT if you're ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, IN A SINGLE DAY.

Learn how the criminal justice system perceives and evaluates claims of self-defense, learn the five elements of any self-defense claim, learn defense of others and property, learn how to interact with the police in the aftermath of a use-of-force event, and much, MUCH more.

And for a brief time you can SAVE UP TO 50% by registering during the early discount period.

Click here NOW to learn more: https://lawofselfdefense.com/advanced

Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

#Ohio #selfdefense #supremecourt #warningshots #gunrights #legalnews #currentevents #newsupdate #gunlaws #lawandjustice #firearmrights #secondamendment #justice #standyourground #personalsafety #controversy #publicsafety #legalanalysis #courtdecision #landmarkcase #TylerWilson