Lake Trial III Day 2 #1 -Blehm pretends to fumble his papers on accident? Is he just playing a role?

Is the likeable, bumbling slowtalker just a role Blehm is playing? Isn't it odd the other Arizona lawyers were threatened out of joining the Kari Lake case, but not Blehm?

It could be he's a good man just doing his best and the courts are rigged, but it seems like he's throwing the case sometimes. But you know the Judge will side with Maricopa no matter what Lake's lawyer says.

The first thing I noticed about Blehm is he never drives the argument home, not even when he catches them in a lie. So it's not odd that AZ RINOS would let him join the case if they knew he'd lose it. He represented Doug Logan too, lost big.

Why wouldn't he or Olson take what sounds like solid advice from Heath and Donofrio and go hard after the county NOT comparing sigs to the registration record? Legal precedent is set:
https://electionpdfs.locals.com/post/5354305/superior-court-judge-napper-voter-signature-verification-under-fontes-hobbs-unlawful
https://electionpdfs.locals.com/post/5354296/judge-napper-ruling-on-registration-record-definition

But Blehm hardly mentions it in trial, even though it's in his pre-trial motions, even though the Supreme Court seemed to suggest it directly in the remand.

Why does he never mention that signatures WERE given to the AZ Senate, audited and released in public docs, JUST LAST ELECTION?

Pulitzer says Blehm palled around with Bennett and Pullen during the CN audit. Did they screw Doug Logan together? Maybe not, but sometimes I wonder.

For me Pulitzer is totally credible on these matters when he's not critiquing someone else's work that he never read. I don't think he's making it up that Blehm was spending time with the McCainites. It could be he had to do that to get their permission to lawyer for Kari, and Doug Logan would have lost no matter what. But does Blehm make it easy for judges to rig cases, and does he do it on purpose? Is it an act?