Premium Only Content
No Duty to Defend No Possible Duty to Indemnify
Legal Conclusions are Not Allegations of Fact
Post 4734
Zox LLC ("Zox") appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of West American Insurance Company. The district court held that West American had no duty to defend or indemnify Zox in an underlying trademark dispute between Zox and a group of entrepreneurs known as the "Zox Brothers" ("the Zox Litigation"). Zox contends the district court erred because the Zox Brothers sought damages for three potentially covered claims: (1) malicious prosecution; (2) disparagement; and (3) use of an "advertising idea."
In ZOX LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, v. West American Insurance Company; et al., No. 23-55125, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (February 9, 2024) the Ninth Circuit resolved the dispute.
ANALYSIS
Under California law, a liability insurer owes a broad duty to defend its insured against claims that potentially seek damages within the coverage of the policy. Coverage turns not on the technical legal cause of action pleaded by the third party but on the facts alleged.
While the duty to defend is broad, an insurer will not be compelled to defend its insured when the potential for liability is tenuous and farfetched. To determine whether the duty to defend was triggered, the Ninth Circuit was compelled to compare the allegations in the Zox Brothers' pleadings ("the Pleadings") with the terms of West American's Insurance Policy ("the Policy").
Malicious Prosecution
To plead a malicious prosecution claim, the Zox Brothers must plead facts to prove that an underlying action was initiated or maintained (i) by, or at the direction of, [Zox] and pursued to a legal termination in favor of the Zox Brothers; (ii) without probable cause; and (iii) with malice. The Zox Brothers did not plead facts, nor provide extrinsic evidence, to satisfy any of the requisite elements of a malicious prosecution claim. The Pleadings did not trigger coverage for malicious prosecution.
Disparagement
To plead a disparagement claim, the Zox Brothers must plead facts to show a false or misleading statement that (1) specifically refers to the Zox Brothers' product or business and (2) clearly derogates that product or business. The Ninth Circuit was required to look past labels and at the facts alleged. Zox was unable to cite a single factual pleading in support of a disparagement claim.
Appropriation of Advertising Ideas
Zox contends that the Zox Brothers triggered coverage by claiming that Zox appropriated their "advertising ideas" by using the "Zox" name and "passing off" their products as Zox Brothers' goods. An "advertising idea" is a "process or invention" used to market one's goods. The district court did not err in finding that the Pleadings did not trigger coverage for a "use of another's advertisement" claim.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated by the Ninth Circuit, outlined above, it found that West American did not have a duty to defend or indemnify Zox in the Zox Litigation because, there was no duty to defend.
Where there is a duty to defend, there may be a duty to indemnify; but where there is no duty to defend, there cannot be a duty to indemnify.
ZALMA OPINION
The Ninth Circuit applied the clear and unambiguous language of the policy to the "facts" alleged; found that the allegations were mostly speculative or based on legal conclusions, failure to allege facts to support the three claims failed and, therefore, the Ninth Circuit had no choice but to affirm the summary judgment find no duty to defend nor a duty to indemnify.
(c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/publish/post/107007808
Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01
Go to X @bzalma; Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – http://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library.
-
20:53
SLS - Street League Skateboarding
3 days agoGold Medals, World Class Food, Night life & more - Get Lost: Tokyo
87.8K9 -
LIVE
Yefune Kenizi's [PC] Gaming
3 hours agoGTAO - Heists Week: Friday w/ GamingChad
128 watching -
1:23:02
Baked Linguini's Home Channel
2 hours agoToads Wearing Sunglasses - Let's Play Battletoads in Battlemaniacs
9.44K1 -
LIVE
Akademiks
5 hours agoDiddy Last Stance! Bail Hearing Live! Lil Durk Case update! Young Thug not getting back his SH*T?
4,346 watching -
In The Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd
22 hours agoLegacy media CANNOT be trusted | In the Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd – Ep. 697 – 11/22/2024
47.8K16 -
1:22:02
The Quartering
3 hours agoTrump BEATS NYC Felony Charges, New Woke Car Ads, WW3 Updates & More
75K40 -
10:03
Colion Noir
4 hours agoKimber's First "True" Double Stack 1911 Isn't Just A Gun It's A Statement
20.7K11 -
1:46:28
vivafrei
7 hours agoKeir Starmer Goes Full Tyrant! Canada Goes Full Gestapo! Trump Picks & MORE! Viva Frei Live
77.5K34 -
1:10:50
The New American
3 hours agoIs The Deep State Trying to Trigger WW3 Before Trump Takes Office? | The New American Daily
22.9K7 -
51:36
PMG
15 hours ago $4.10 earned"Hannah Faulkner and Sophia Lorey | FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATED"
34K6