World Health Organization Plans for International Legislation Explained by Dr Kat Lindley

Dr Lindley outlines concisely and clearly, what the World Health Organization international laws being put into motion and intended to be passed in May 2024, will mean for you, your family, and the way you live your lives. Covid was just a practice-run. This is not public health, but the implementation of a totalitarian, biosecurity state.

Dr Katarina Lindley, 2 February 2024:

The World Health Assembly of the WHO will meet in May 2024 to vote on adoption of both the Pandemic Agreement (Treaty) and the Amendments to International Health Regulations. Once approved by 2/3 of the World Health Assembly, the Pandemic Treaty will go to the US Senate (and other national governments) for ratification and will need 2/3 of the votes to be implemented. It goes into effect one month after the 40th Member State signs on and it cannot be abandoned until one year has passed. This process of "officially leaving" will then take 24 months.

International Health Regulations (IHRs) were first adopted in 1969 and most recently amended in 2005. The IHRs are legally binding international law covering measures for preventing the transnational spread of infectious diseases.

The amendments to IHRs need 50% of the World Health Assembly vote and do not need a specific approval by national governments to be enacted. The Member States can OPT-OUT from the amended IHR within 10 months of the approval by the WHA (or, as is the case for New Zealand, within 18 months for those nations who rejected Amendment 57 in December 2023).

The Pandemic Agreement/Treaty draft is intended to support the bureaucracy, financing, and governance to underpin the expanded IHR. The draft IHR amendments would lay out new powers for the WHO during health emergencies and broaden the context within which they can be used.

This is my testimony for State of New Hampshire on HB 1156:
"AN ACT relative to public health, safety, and state sovereignty.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization; Jurisdiction. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization shall have no jurisdiction in New Hampshire. The state and its political subdivisions, including, but not limited to counties, cities, towns, precincts, water districts, school districts, school administrative units, or quasi-public entities, shall not engage in the enforcement of, or any collaboration with the enforcement of, any requirements, mandates, recommendations, instructions or guidance provided by either organization. Furthermore, any requirements, mandates, recommendations, instructions, or guidance by either organization shall not be used in this state to justify any mask, vaccine or medical testing requirements and shall have no force or effect in New Hampshire."
Dr. Kat Lindley, D.O. FACOFP

VIDEO SOURCE: https://twitter.com/KLVeritas/status/1753840141850796105