Rep. Nancy Mace, the STAR of the Hunter Biden hearing! January 10, 2024 (READ DESCRIPTION)

1 year ago
862

Rep. #NancyMace must see #HunterBinden and #SteveBannon as equals. According to Rep. Mace, a private citizen like you and me, and a presidential advisor with presidential executive privilege, both must comply equally with a congressional subpoena or face jail time. What political team is Ms. Mace really on? What politico can fully trust her? The legacy GOP RINOs? The America First and MAGA Trump supporters? Or the Marxist-Democrats who support the Obama-Biden regime? I hope I can!

Sometimes one can't always vote their conscience, and they'll have to temporarily sacrifice a minor principal to compromise and take one for team if a political party wants to remain a cohesive force to get things accomplished with other people within their own party. Whenever a few members of a party go rogue and vote with the other party, like Republicans usually do, sometimes it's nearly impossible to move their agenda forward, and we always see gridlock. Some Democrats will vote to the other extreme and would sacrifice their own mother to stay in lockstep with THE STATE PARTY if they needed to, just to advance their Marxist ideology, and so they tow the party line.

But no one asked Rep. Nancy to forgo any of her righteous morals by sticking with the Republicans and voting NO to having a biased party committee subpoena a former presidential advisor. And so it would seem that any member on congress (depending on what side is in power at the time) can subpoena any one they want in the opposing party. Does congress really want to open that floodgate? Rep. Nancy Mace could also be subpoenaed and used by the Marxists, and be forced to appear before any star chamber soviet-style committee early in the morning on a bad hair day after the water heater breaks down the coffee-maker is on the fritz.

Why was Rep. Nancy Mace the only Republican member of the House in Congress to vote with the Democrats to hold a former Trump advisor in contempt of congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena from a sham January 6 committee that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi created, who had denied the Republicans any choice at all as to what TWO Republicans could sit on her obviously very biased committee? And of all the former advisors for Trump, family members and Republican members of congress who were also subpoenaed, why did Nancy Mace only make her stand with Steve Bannon when Trump's trade advisor #PeterNavarro had also defied Pelosi subpoena based on executive privilege on behalf of President Trump?

The curious case of Nancy Mace: After Jan. 6, one GOP freshman swung away from Donald Trump then seemed to swing back — until a recent vote that nudged her back away.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/26/curious-case-of-nancy-mace-517159

Can a Congressional Committee Subpoena Members of Congress?
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/can-congressional-committee-subpoena-members-congress

List of those subpoenaed by the House select committee investigating the instigated riot on January 6, 2021
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3514712-heres-a-list-of-the-people-who-have-been-subpoenaed-by-the-jan-6-committee/

Full committee hearing:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?532775-1/oversight-committee-debates-resolution-hold-hunter-biden-contempt-congress-part-1

Why did the REPUBLICAN Speakers of the House, former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and the current Speaker #MikeJohnson, both refuse to create their OWN #J6 committee?

After the House Republican's January 10 CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS hearing on Hunter Biden for failing to comply with a congressional subpoena, the Democrat's and the media's narrative now is: "Hunter Biden made every effort to comply with the Republican's subpoena to publicly testify before their committee, even today, now, while he sits here in this committee. But they refuse to allow him to testify, to tell the truth, to tell them everything they want to know."

But the subpoena that Hunter Biden ignored was for a PRIVATE CLOSED-DOOR DEPOSITION; but instead, he showed up on that day for a press briefing at the Capital building to offer himself up for testimony for a PUBLIC hearing before the committee.

The chair of the committee, Rep. Jim Comer had previously offered Hunter Biden a choice to come in voluntarily for a closed-door hearing or public testimony. But the offer was ignored and Hunter only agreed to a PUBLIC hearing after learned he was going to be subpoena for a PRIVATE hearing.

But no matter what the Chair had VERBALLY offered during an interview on #Newsmax, the committee had voted for and issued a subpoena for a PRIVATE HEARING, which Hunter ignored, because it would given the committee much more information than a public clown show would.

And the Democrats know that, that's why they subpoenaed their witnesses for their sham January 6 committee for PRIVATE hearings — of which, they destroyed most transcripts and video that would have been exculpatory evidence for Donald Trump. And the Republican Speaker won't to anything about that or create his own #J6 committee. Why?!?!?

Loading comments...