EXPOSED! Father Vilified, Parenting Ignored (UK Care Proceedings)

FOLLOW OUR STORY:
https://linktr.ee/justice4keanu

SIGN THE PETITION:
www.change.org/justice4keanu

SHARE AND DONATE:
gofundme.com/justice4keanu

MEDIA INQUIRIES:
I have over 80 hours worth of Court hearings recorded, 7000+ pages of court documents, and much more. Only liars fear the truth.
Email: darcherbond@protonmail.com.

DESCRIPTION:
You would think these Care Proceedings that took place in February and May of 2023… the UK process by which they were to determine whether to return my abducted son to his father (me) or to the mother's sister (Aunt Deborah)… would focus on the capacity to parent. Right? Isn't that what's important here?

Turned out that wasn’t a primary or even secondary concern for this circus masquerading as a court and it was never more glaringly obvious than when Nick Brown cross-examined me. The Coventry City Council was more interested in covering their own asses.

Despite my attempts to steer the line of questioning toward my ability to parent, these clowns avoided the subject. Instead, this barrister prioritized twisting my words and chastising me for sharing confidential information about the UK case with U.S. authorities.

Nick Brown was deflecting from the Coventry City Council’s own negligence, which had enabled the mother’s violent (and predictable) abduction attempt which traumatized my son. But hey, Coventry endangering children has been a running theme if you’ve watched any of these videos.
.
.
To clarify, a U.S. Judge had dissolved an order that in turn jeopardized the criminal protection order (CPO) issued for my son and I to keep the homicidal mother away. Without any such deterrence in place, we were both sitting ducks for her to strike again. This would mean an inevitable physical confrontation with the mother that I sought to AVOID, particularly because I wouldn’t want him exposed to violence (AGAIN), which is why I used such strong language to implore the importance of keeping the CPO intact. Naturally this was turned against me.

Part of this exchange was also projection. When the homicidal mother, who didn’t just threaten to kill me but was evidenced by the Local Authority itself to have hired someone to do it, the LA was notified when she hopped a plane back to the U.S. This was also to avoid five pending charges of assault plus attempted abduction of a minor. Being that I was a target you'd think I'd be kept in the loop. Instead, the Coventry City Council FAILED to notify me or my solicitors for over two months, during which time the mother could have easily rung my doorbell in the States and pulled a trigger. I'd never have seen it coming.

That’s why they wanted to make ME out to be a threat of some kind, to mitigate the reality that THEY had previously endangered my son, and now myself, by TWICE enabling the psychotic mother. That, albeit indirectly, made THEM the real threat.

But most revealing in this clip, I think, is the fact that I had objective evidence proving that the mother had purchased property near the Aunt’s, where Coventry was proposing to send my son. AND that the grandmother lived with the Aunt. These were highly relevant factors because BOTH mother and grandmother had been assessed by the Local Authority to pose a grave risk to my son’s safety, making their proximity to the potential placement in Florida highly alarming. Yet the public records were shrugged off as "just two documents".

Meanwhile the Aunt’s mere word, without any evidence, was treated as gospel. And as of October, she was proven to have lied (as predicted) when she cut off my contact with my son even BEFORE his return to the U.S. (he's still in Coventry as of right now). She never had any intention to facilitate the relationship. And it proves she doesn’t love my son. Otherwise she’d never cut out his father, who he loves dearly.

The brazen bias of this court, the lack of basic professionalism, and the stubborn refusal to prioritize my son, has been an abomination of justice.

My son is still set to be sent to the Aunt’s despite all the evidenced risk factors: She’s physically disabled, lives in a 530sqft manufactured dump with 6 people, owns guns and pitbulls, and has admitted in writing her intent to transition my boy back to his abusive mother.

Judge Lieven wrote she had no safety concerns about my son living with me and expressed confidence that I would protect him from the mother. Yet concluded by ruling against me solely on the basis of the "toxicity between the parents". Which was ridiculous since I have a SOLE custody order. The mother wouldn't be around.

ACTION:
Let Nick Brown know how you feel!

Phone: +44 (0) 121 246 1600
Email: nbrown@st-philips.com
Web: https://st-philips.com/our_people/nick-brown/

#familycourt #familycourtcorruption #fypシ゚viral シ #fyptiktok #circus #uk #justicelieven #coventrycity #coventrycitycouncil #childabduction #givemebackmyson #enoughisenough #lawsuitincoming #fathersrights #fathersandsons #careproceedings #childrenfirst #priorities #soundoffreedom #humanrightsviolation #savethechildren #justice4keanu