Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3fa3/c3fa31a79f1ceaa71d892e4245d0f065e09250c5" alt="Supreme Showdown: Unpacking the United States v. Rahimi Gun Rights Battle"
Supreme Showdown: Unpacking the United States v. Rahimi Gun Rights Battle
Facts of the case
---
Between December 2020 and January 2021, Zackey Rahimi was involved in a series of violent incidents in Arlington, Texas, including multiple shootings and a hit-and-run. Rahimi was under a civil protective order for alleged assault against his ex-girlfriend, which explicitly prohibited him from possessing firearms. Police searched his home and found a rifle and a pistol, leading to Rahimi’s indictment for violating federal law 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which makes it unlawful for someone under a domestic violence restraining order to possess firearms. Rahimi moved to dismiss the indictment on constitutional grounds but was denied, as his argument was foreclosed by United States v. McGinnis, 956 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 2020).
Rahimi pleaded guilty but continued his constitutional challenge on appeal. As the appeal was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 579 U.S. __ (2022). Rahimi argued that Bruen overruled McGinnis and thus that § 922(g)(8) was unconstitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed.
Question Presented
---
Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violate the Second Amendment?
Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join
★☆★ CONTACT UNCIVIL LAW ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw
★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G
Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm
Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8
-
1:29:09
UncivilLaw
1 year agoTrump's Legal Fate in Balance - Can he Be Charged Without Senate Impeachment Confirmation?
370 -
1:13:00
Patriots With Grit
10 hours agoWill Americans Rise Up? | Jeff Calhoun
29.1K10 -
14:55
Exploring With Nug
10 hours ago $9.92 earnedWe Found Semi Truck Containers While Searching for Missing Man!
47.6K7 -
27:57
MYLUNCHBREAK CHANNEL PAGE
18 hours agoOff Limits to the Public - Pt 3
98K62 -
38:07
Michael Franzese
11 hours agoLeaving Organized Crime and Uncovering Mob in Politics: Tudor Dixon and Michael Franzese
85.5K15 -
2:42:54
Jewels Jones Live ®
2 days agoAMERICA IS BACK | A Political Rendezvous - Ep. 111
69K46 -
8:47:33
Due Dissidence
1 day agoLIVE: Workers Strike Back Conference ft. Chris Hedges, Jill Stein, Kshama Sawant, and More!
110K57 -
8:36:37
Right Side Broadcasting Network
5 days agoLIVE REPLAY: CPAC 2025 Day Three with President Donald J. Trump - 2/22/25
449K99 -
1:05:34
The Big Migâ„¢
19 hours agoConfirmed Kash Patel New FBI Director, Bring On The Pain |EP483
107K31 -
53:59
Tactical Advisor
15 hours agoThe Vault Room Podcast 009 | Everyone Getting $5000?!
84.3K12