Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5829c/5829c9327af986fe8ea1d27946dc73320601ca75" alt="THIS Happens If You UNINTENTIONALLY PEW-PEW a BYSTANDER!"
THIS Happens If You UNINTENTIONALLY PEW-PEW a BYSTANDER!
A question that comes up with some regularity is what are the legal consequences if a round fired in self-defense unintentionally kills an innocent bystander.
Is the defender guilty of murder of that bystander? Of manslaughter? Is there any legal liability at all? And, whatever the answer--why? What's the underlying legal doctrine?
I've addressed this question many times, but last week a Law of Self Defense Member asked during Friday's live stream about a case out of the Kansas Supreme Court that he believed suggests my answer is wrong--or, at least, is contradicted by that particular case.
Is it possible? Did Attorney Andrew F. Branca make a mistake about use-of-force law?
It's certainly POSSIBLE--like all of you, I'm merely human. And I always appreciate the possibility being brought to my attention, as that ensures I keep my use-of-force law expertise as sharp as possible.
In this particular case, however, the Kansas case cited is exactly consistent with my usual explanation of how the law treats bystander killings--and in today's show I'll share that case with you and explain why I'm still right. :-)
Join LIVE at Noon ET to discuss!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
You have a GUN so you're hard to KILL--know the LAW so you're hard to CONVICT.
https://lawofselfdefense.com/
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
28:46
Law of Self Defense LLC
3 months agoFriends, Americans, Countrymen, Lend Me Your Ears: Peanut's Eulogy
1.6K6 -
34:44
LFA TV
5 days agoMIRACLES DO HAPPEN!
4.07K -
16:43
T-SPLY
2 hours agoCNN Panel Member Forgets Donald Trump Runs The Military
405 -
31:13
World Nomac
21 hours agoAMERICAN visits IRAN for 10 days (this is what I found) 🇮🇷
5211 -
1:03:55
The Tom Renz Show
8 hours agoBongino In At FBI & Is Factory Meat Made of Cancer?
5.04K3 -
7:03
Dangerous Freedom
16 hours agoBest Tiny Budget Red Dot? (Honest Review - Gideon Optics Judge).
601 -
10:32
ariellescarcella
12 hours ago"Being Trans Made Me Gay" : Hormone Science Explained
631 -
1:02:09
PMG
9 hours ago $0.14 earnedTrump to BAN the COVID Vaxx?! mRNA in Your Organic Meat?! w/ Kim Bright
4293 -
2:42:10
TimcastIRL
13 hours agoTrump To SHUTTER 120 IRS Offices In MASS PURGE, Democrat LEAKED Tax Info w/Mike Crispi | Timcast IRL
212K79 -
3:21:29
Alex Zedra
12 hours agoLIVE! New Game | R.E.P.O
60.2K6