MALICE BLACK LIES AND SUIT POSTED LOLLICON TO A GUY...

11 months ago
74

#drama
#malice
#lolcows

Malice Black deleted or hid her channel for several days after lying that I threatened to go IRL with her, something I don't do. So let's see the responses I have had to Malice. All are public and on my community tab. Also, Suit Yourself is telling everyone he never was caught posting lollicon of Bubbles from the Power Puff Girls in his Discord a couple years ago in 2021...so here's how you can go down that rabbit hole.

My detractors support SA, grape, lollicon and a lot of other really creepy and weird stuff and this is ultimately why I refuse to respond. I do not argue with chomo supporters. End of.

Congratulations for all the new detractors of mine who joined their chomo supporter club! May you all get the karma you deserve...

Join this channel to get access to perks including cool emojis!! All proceeds go back into the channel and into our calls of action. Join here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRMtelO586kp5vP5mzWx1Ig/join

Thanks so much for all your support! Means a lot! Much love to you all! xo

Please let me know what you are interested in seeing more of!! Join my communities!!

Discord : QUEEN OF KARMA#8669
E-mail : bethgibbons74@gmail.com
MERCH: https://teespring.com/stores/throwing-spade
IG : @xoqueenofkarmaxo

** Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Furthermore, all clips are used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). As was ruled in Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), clips from an original work may be used to “comment on and critique a work”, and the use of clips is “reasonable to accomplish the transformative purpose of critical commentary”. See also NXIVM v. The Ross Institute, Inc., 364 F.3d 471 (2nd Cir. 2004) (quotations from course materials for critical commentary was fair use). I believe my video is transformative in nature in order to criticize and comment and is not intended as a market substitute for the original video. **

*Disclaimer: All opinions expressed in this video are mine alone and do not reflect on anyone else. I speak out about these topics to the best of my ability and knowledge and only speak for myself.*

Loading comments...