Bob Whitaker: What Diversity Means & Why Conservatives Are White People's Worst Enemy

What really hit me hard, and what we wouldn't recognize today, is the parade of beauty. Every one of them was Nordic, and I could not find a single girl in the group who was not enormously attractive. Not a trace of diversity among them.

The young ladies were apparently at an annual celebration. They were all lifeguards on Australian beaches. Now the movie was made in 1960, exactly forty six years ago. These young ladies were Australians. There was not a dark one in the group. There was no diversity, just pure beauty, and that was back when Australia had a Whites only White Australia policy.

And the results of it were astounding. You just don't see that sort of thing, and even then was it was a shocker to see all of these beautiful girl marching together, thousands of them.

We have to understand what the word 'diversity' means. Diversity is aimed at (produing) a society where everybody is a more or less even mixture of races, where everybody has brown eyes, dark skin and black hair. So you have lots of people who vary from dark skin brown eyes and black hair, to people who have dark skin, brown eyes and black hair, and it's a sort of mixed racial ancestry like you can find in Brazil - that most successful countries.

These beautiful young ladies were marching along, and again they're part of history now, the movie was made in 1960, some 45 years ago, with the White Australia policy and every girl was beautiful, and they marched out, and it was really one of those scenes that even in 1960 you just don't get thousands of beautiful girls of all together.

In 1961, when I watched it the first time, Australia did have this White Australia policy, and at that time I was hoping that it would continue. But I also made some predictions before then, and by 1961 I was already saying that if Australia gets rid of it's White Australia policies it will not be the liberals who do it. It will be the conservatives, and course everybody gave me that usual look people always gave me with my correct prediction because to most people my prediction sounds incredible to them.

Well sure enough it was the Australian conservatives who brag and brag and brag about the fact that they got rid of this terrible White immigration policy, White Australian policy its called, and now they have race riots like all the other countries and they're so proud of it.

There's no more determined enemy of Whites than respectable conservatives, and of course the respectable conservatives, since he pretends to be the opposition, is the perfect person to subvert White people and to help in the program of genocide against Whites.

I remember in many of the war movies from world war two era when a beautiful blond woman would show up and some sergeant would say to the young men, 'now THAT is what you're fighting for'. Actually, according to the WW2 generation, the weakest generation, that was what they were fighting AGAINST. They did not want blondness, they wanted, they say now, to fight for non-discrimination, what is called assimilation They wanted America and all White countries and only White countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.

That was the anti-racist program of the 'greatest generation'. And what it boils down to is there is to be no White people in the future. Which means, that when the sergeant said in the movie 'that is what you're fighting for', in fact blonde beauty was exactly what he was fighting against. Hitler was for it, and therefore it had to be done away with.

Excerpts, Bob Whitaker, Porch Talk - Mondo Cane (2006)

Video: 'Mondo Cane' (1960)
---------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© )
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
------------------------------------