Kindergarten Cop

~ Supplemental Material ~

"Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed."

- Friedrich Nietzsche

In an age where technology plays a significant role in our daily lives, it is not surprising that social media platforms have strict Terms of Service (TOS) that users must adhere to. However, what is peculiar is how individuals can violate these TOS and be immediately suspended, shadow banned, or fully banned; while certain content that raises red flags, seems to go unnoticed or unaddressed. This raises the question of whether these actions are intentional rather than mere oversight.

It is important to note the level of diligence with which these Big Tech platforms monitor and police their content. They have sophisticated algorithms and teams of moderators dedicated to taking down, removing or flagging inappropriate material and individuals who do not comply with their guidelines. Given this level of vigilance, it is difficult to believe that certain content slips through the cracks accidentally. The fact that some content that may be harmful or misleading, is allowed to remain on the platforms; while individuals are swiftly penalized for minor infractions; raises suspicions about the true intentions behind these actions.

One could argue that these platforms may have ulterior motives for targeting certain individuals or content, while turning a blind eye to others. For example, if a user posts information that is critical of a certain political figure or organization, they may be more likely to be suspended or banned, even if their content does not explicitly violate the TOS. On the other hand, content that aligns with the interests or agenda of the platform, may be given a pass; even if it contains misinformation or harmful rhetoric.

Furthermore, the fact that these platforms have been accused of denying or downplaying serious issues such as the systemic problem of the trafficking of minors (despite evidence proving otherwise), further adds to the suspicion that their actions are not purely based on maintaining a safe and inclusive online environment.

https://rumble.com/v5fcyct-the-boys-in-the-band.html

https://x.com/Red_Pill_US/status/1836873954797224111

https://x.com/mommapancakess/status/1836791347941957814

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1837155192476778568

There have been numerous reports and investigations that have uncovered instances of trafficking and exploitation of minors on Facebook also in Meta's other platform, Instagram. Yet, they continue to claim that these activities are not prevalent. This raises questions about their credibility and integrity, which has been an ongoing situation.

https://rumble.com/v31x8qa-lair-of-the-dragon-krueger.html

The examination of Mark Zuckerberg's behavior and its correlation with issues surrounding his company, Meta, allows for a greater understanding of the ethical implications of social media platforms on personal privacy and security. Zuckerberg has perpetually been under scrutiny for his leadership style and approach to business ethics.

His behavior has been likened to that of serial offenders. Observers have often pointed out traits commonly associated with narcissism in his public persona. Narcissism can manifest in various ways, including a lack of empathy, an inflated sense of self-importance, and manipulation of facts and perceptions.

https://rumble.com/v319twe-lair-of-the-dragon-true-lies.html

https://rumble.com/v31ghvq-grand-order-of-the-beast-pinocchio.html

Although Zuckerberg maintained his innocence, in the interview linked above; he was found guilty in court and ordered to pay restitution for his actions. All of this shows his lack of respect and sensitivity, reflecting his true character.

Meta's history with legal issues underscores the darker implications of Zuckerberg's leadership and business practices. Over the years, the company has faced multiple lawsuits and has been mandated to pay significant restitution for privacy violations. In a notable instance, Meta reached a settlement over accusations related to improper data handling of users, reflecting broader concerns about how the platform treats personal data.

Allegations of narcissism and gaslighting, combined with the company's history of legal troubles, contribute to an unsettling picture of user exploitation. This continuous pattern of behavior raises critical ethical dilemmas surrounding user privacy and consent. Zuckerberg's actions, both personally and as a CEO, showcase a lack of respect for individual autonomy and safety, aligning him with behaviors that evoke more serious criminal acts.

https://youtu.be/mxDNZJKdryI

This discussion about privacy and security; offered by social media platforms, would be incomplete, without addressing the situation with TikTok. As comparisons between the two companies arise; TikTok has faced allegations of data management similar to those leveled against Meta. It is essential to understand the reasons behind these narratives.

The campaign to ban TikTok in various jurisdictions appears, in part, as a strategic move influenced by competing interests. Accusations levied against TikTok, for its association with the Chinese government, amplify fears around personal data safety. In contrast, Meta's long-standing infractions often escape the same scrutiny. These selective condemnations suggest a manipulated narrative designed to maintain the status quo, favoring established players like Facebook and Instagram.

A detailed list of fabricated material, designed for manipulation purposes, can be seen at the link below:

https://rumble.com/v5fv6yr-the-boy-who-harnessed-the-wind.html

The widespread use of Meta platforms should prompt users, especially those with religious beliefs, to reconsider their support. These apps pose significant threats to personal security, essentially functioning as spyware. By using these platforms; a person is paying people to be spied upon. Every employee gets paid by your activities.

https://rumble.com/v4b08k6-maid-in-manhattan.html

The link above, underlines a crucial point: most media corporations, including radio, TV, and online entities, rely on monetization strategies. "Free" services come at a cost, which is often users' personal data and privacy. It is essential to recognize that these corporations operate on profit models, whether through direct charges or indirect methods.

"Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him."

- John 2:15

For all those that are Christian. That verse and others similar to it, needs to be seriously considered. There are better alternatives.

https://rumble.com/v4440rf-pulse.html

Again, it's something everyone that calls themselves a Christian, really needs to think about.

Those that have enjoyed the video presentation and wish to see more from the creator: Paul Joseph Watson, his material can be found at:

https://rumble.com/c/PJW

For those who find value in this channel and wish to contribute positively; the most significant manner of doing so is through prayer. The lifting up of prayers for this channel; represents undoubtedly the most profound gift one can offer.

Given the various bureaucrats and their operatives, that support the Woke movement; I will not reveal my identity. However, you can always pray for "the individual running the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." God will know your intentions.

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration!

https://gab.com/Carryingmarine/posts/112940676595137637

Post Scriptum: In the section labeled "Supplemental Material:" located just below the video post date, view count and provided tags; there is valuable content worth exploring, especially on this channel. This section often contains a wealth of additional information and resources.

You may find it beneficial to peruse this section to gain further insights. The reason for the detailed explanation is to address the varied terminology used by different individuals, which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.

(DISCLAIMER: All videos posted within this channel are for educational and historical purposes only. Under the auspices of the Copyright Act of 1976; under section 107 of the copyright disclaimer; all material within this channel is posted with the aforementioned purpose.

The participation of all individuals involved in the creation or association with the video, as well as those referenced in the description section - including any linked resources - does not imply any acknowledgment, endorsement, support or affiliation with this channel or the content produced by its operator.

Moreover, neither this platform, nor any associated individuals necessarily concur with or endorse the views expressed by the operator of this channel. All opinions and perspectives are exclusively those of the channel's operator.

Conversely, all images, videos, quotes, etc., the facilitation of such, does not necessarily equate usage as an endorsement (e.g., the use of the images from Anonymous, isn't an endorsement of the movement). The utilization of said items, within posts, is for aesthetic purposes or to underscore an issue.

Permission is granted in the use of written content; which has been constructed by the operator but the utilization of the videos themselves; permission can NOT be granted, since they are NOT owned by said operator. Only that which is authorized by the Copyright Act of 1976 and the guidelines in which it is given; is what is allowed, in terms of videos.

All materials pertaining to health, nutrition, dietary supplements and associated topics; may not possess approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, it is advisable that inquiries related to health matters and any associated concerns, should be directed to qualified professionals. Furthermore, any financial recommendations provided should be thoroughly evaluated, prior to implementation, as there are no assurances of successful outcomes.)

Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleet