Nurse Gail Macrae: Discouraging early (COVID) treatment is the opposite of sound health care

11 months ago
615

Patients with ‘COVID’ were told to stay home and do nothing until their lips turned blue, at which point they could call a hospital. This is contrary to all medical principles and medical common sense.

There is not any disease that benefits from waiting with treatment. You wouldn’t wait until a small fire becomes a huge forest fire, would you? You don’t wait until an infected wound goes completely out of control before starting treatment.

The barrier to starting treatment becomes should be especially low if treatments are available that are safe and cheap. Vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc belong in this category.

NB: If the treatment is incredibly toxic and expensive, such as chemotherapy, there can be a trade-off, but only if the treatment has a medical benefit.

Not only does telling people to do nothing hurt their physical recovery, but it also makes them feel helpless and hopeless, which harms them both physically and psychologically.

NB: Early ‘COVID’ treatment was not merely discouraged, but the tyrants did everything in their power to prevent people getting their hands on authorized and proven safe medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. These medications were smeared (e.g. as horse paste), primary care doctors were persecuted for prescribing them off-label, doctors in hospitals were forbidden to use them, pharmacies refused to dispense them, etc.

When you look at all the evidence individually and combined, it becomes abundantly clear that the policies were NOT intended to optimize public health. Instead, they were intended to make people as FEARFUL as possible, as MISERABLE as possible, and as HELPLESS as possible.

NB: See also the psychological term ‘learned helplessness’.

They should regard the novel ‘vaccine’ as their ONLY possible hope and savior, as their ONLY ticket back to normal and the ONLY way that could save them (and grandma) from near-certain death due to the ‘killer virus’.

One overarching goal of these policies was to get as many people as possible to line up for mass injection with an ultra-profitable ‘vaccine,’ in order to maximize wealth transfer. The policies were also intended to assist in a power grab, which included more surveillance and control.

It is becoming ever clearer that those at the very top did NOT design the measures of mass destruction out of ignorance, incompetence, panic, or group think. The policies were no mistakes. Instead, they had malicious intent. They were intended to further the personal agenda of the policy makers at the expense of public health and wellbeing.

SOURCE

Segment from:
https://rumble.com/v36uula

Loading comments...