YouTube Blocked this immediately this morning then deleted all my replies to comments on my own videos!!

I made a video on your tube and rumble about my disclosure and how these platforms are required to honor law regardless of what they are used to doing to people. A guy replied giving some constructive cristicism, some not, when he called me a flat earther, and I am not a flat earther, not yet.
I spent a little over an hour on my reply, and couldn't post it. So I broke it up into two parts this morning, not realizing it may have exceeded the digit limit. Then I made a video reply in case you tube blocked my words again on my own channel in response to a reply on my own video. Now this video I am about to show you got the most voilent insta block from youn tube since the ac dc video i did when the nfl used the same song the same week so they blocked my video for a week. and I recorded them doing it this time, that's the next video of me. I appeal all five appeals for this video right here. Now watch it stay up here with zero problems, because it is a legal fair use video copyright exception due to reaction and review and the transformative nature of this creation.
This message is public notice and free speech protected by our nation's Constitution. Anyone who believes this message to be "misinformation" may, within 60 days of the posting of this video provide legal reference showing any portion of this message to be inaccurate, and if we can verify that Legal reference as applicable and valid, We will voluntarily remove this message.
This message is for educational purposes and does not represent legal advice or service. Turbo World network is solely responsible for the content of this video. According to section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the platforms which carry our content, our legally transformed Fair use media, and our messages, are not the content creators of our posts, and are not responsible for the contents of this message in any way, and therefore, have no right to label, suppress, or remove our content.
Anyone removing this message without our consent, or without legal grounds, will be subject to Major monetary penalties which apply fully and seperately to all responsible parties and their organizations. Any defamatory labeling or removal of this message by the host platform or any other outside party or agency without our consent, constitutes Agreement to those terms.
Any person representing this message as unreliable or removing this message or ordering its removal without prior notice to us and without authorization from us, will thereby be agreeing to pay major additional monetary penalties for that nuisance, voilation and Damage.
Our nations Constitution prohibits censorship of, and interference with this message.
my reply to him.@derbsmcbergs your case was from pre covid 2019- it's now 2023 , no disrespect meant, but that's not the end all be all of what is fact and of reality. As far as copied comments, that's not the case with me for spam, if the fiorst one never sends-you heard me? In order to be spam, there would have to be more than one, so that's completely false and taken out of context and dafamatory- exactly as my disclosure states. They made one *massive mistake* in that case (quote you made about you tube)-it's dead wrong in context - lookit - Cable is a private network, owned by private company, the internet and you tube is in fact the epidome of public broadcasters, on a public network of broadcasting, lol , so you are comparing a privately owned cable network, to a literally public accessable anywhere online - federal owned internet platform (usa gov), with a state owned network platform, ie you tube/ google/ california . That means the above court case is irrelevant, zero comparison when comparing private cable networks to public internet- sorry but context is way off and they missed it , not my mistake!!! Court cases are perspectives that HAVE been offered and argued. Alot of cases miss a lot, that's why we appeal. My very perspective, discussed here has zero realtion with what you discussed, and zero court case so far. Just because a perspective, has yet to be faught in court, that has zero effect of what the law is, or the intrepretation of it in my case, and perspective as the creator on this platform, is that the internet is owned by state governement, look it up. That's what the internet is.
You have a few great points, But I think you may have missed a few things , with the exception of my comments and text on this platform. That is the speech, just letting you know this is not manhatton, this is Houston Texas and you can clearly look up the Hr21 law and the Texas constitution as well as United States Constitutional Freedom of Speech right, required in this platform also, In which this platform agreed to, when it agreed to do buisiness here, in which has been only pressed once, in court in a completely different way, due to sexual sex trafficing case where crime was organized on facebook, but facebook was not held responsible, was faught all wrong in my opinion, and was lost by incompetence of explaining perspective , which is how most cases are lost, not becuase there was not a crime committed, and I listed that citing in the video above and the next one coming out rn, maybe will be up tomorrow. But it has never been faught in court that I know of from a creator vs a platform in reference to shadowbanning. Shadow banning is a fancy word for "they hide me". ThaT Term in itself is illegal, when operating a public open platform to share. Yes? That in itself sounds illegal to me, *thank you for recognizing that we are in fact shadownbanned* for real for real. Also it is public broadcasting - the internet lol.
A few rebuttals, you are allowed to think what you want just as I am allowed to constructively answer and argue back. Some think I should remian silent , sorry that's not who I am. In order for you tube to nuke me off this platform they would have to have reason and justification, the same with removing my words, in text on this platform and ideas, and as of right now they just don't - hence my entire point of the above video. I am Blocking them from the next step and from continuing to do it with so many others, who have more to risk than I do, so they can't fight back for what's right and they have less resources and ability to do so. And so the you tube bot bully gets stronger, until what?
Selective enforcement within any industry or company, has to be explained within reason, it can't just be willy nilly- that is because it's effect causes Severe damage- it hurts someone else or even stops the growth of the another client on the same platform, that's selective bias and selective enforcement for a selective set of non existant rules, And fair use review and reaction clause says that's illegal within itself, specifically the part about a platform "cannot ban/ bl;ock or remove a review even if the review puts that same platform in a "bad light" " not to mention the algorythm also offers enough issues, when it's manipulated, all is thrown out the window of Honesty and justice. I'm paraphrasing but if you know law as much as you suggest, you know what I am referring to, oh, and the copyright act, and it's still illegal, and it labels as suppression, infringement, and monopoly In court. Right? Yes!
Now listen, If they could ban me , after all the things I have caught them doing to me on video, what makes you think they would NOT HAVE BANNED ME ALREADY?!! If - I'm such small beans, as you say - Maybe consider why they haven't? I think it's obvious, they know I will fight and win no matter what, rn I think they are just minimizing risk, and losses, and running psyops, comments like the above make me think This.
Anywayszzzzz I think Your theory in itself, is redundant and false, and that's not the way this works, the world works. I think the justice system interprets the rules of commerce with copyrights and mass media, and recognizes infringement as blocking of creations, thoughts and speech that don't fall into a section of rule breaking of anysort. Infringement is when there is negatie bias, and as such, selective enforcement is the result, so when it comes to doing bussiness (Commerce) in the state of Texas-that's illegal, as far as I know, you are open to correct me if I am wrong with cited law and court cases that prove, such, until otherwise, that is The Texas law. If I have to present my case, I will. And after you see the next video, and the end of this one, you already know we are on our way to doing just that and it's not gonna be just me, I'm taking everybody that has been infringed, with me, to collect, for what wrong was done, to make right. To make sure this doesn't happen anymore. Within a platform, it still has to follow legal laws, and disclosures within the platforms from the creators- This platform or any other is simply not exempt from laws and disclosures otherwise, so I made a disclosure that they simply ignored, for that you tube and google are in fact liable by law, for now, and in breech of contract, owe me monetary fund for deleting my words, my thoughts and my creations due to the eliminating of my freespeech and inaliegnable rights as battled for and signed into our God given American constitution. Because Youtube uses bots and my disclosure got overlooked is of zero concern to me, they broke the law, period. Just because I am a mechanic , doesn't make my dislosure (seen below) any less legit or authenic, and they broke every single part of it 9 times in two days. Just because they are used to doing it and getting away with it, doesn't make it right, and sure as heck doesnt make it legal or within law. Just because you think I dont have a leg to stand on, doesnt mean I will stop fighting for free speech on social media. Just saying. It's obvious I have experience, yes?
𝓓𝓸𝓷'𝓽 𝓰𝓮𝓽 𝓶𝓮 𝔀𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓰 𝓘 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓵𝔂 𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓮 𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓱.
However I know infringement is still a thing and it is still against the law. And so far they have broken more than a few other laws in the process of hiding me so well, and I̳̿͟͞ p̳̿͟͞r̳̿͟͞o̳̿͟͞v̳̿͟͞e̳̿͟͞ i̳̿͟͞t̳̿͟͞ i̳̿͟͞n̳̿͟͞ m̳̿͟͞y̳̿͟͞ y̳̿͟͞o̳̿͟͞u̳̿͟͞ t̳̿͟͞u̳̿͟͞b̳̿͟͞e̳̿͟͞ a̳̿͟͞b̳̿͟͞u̳̿͟͞s̳̿͟͞e̳̿͟͞ a̳̿͟͞n̳̿͟͞d̳̿͟͞ m̳̿͟͞i̳̿͟͞s̳̿͟͞t̳̿͟͞a̳̿͟͞k̳̿͟͞e̳̿͟͞s̳̿͟͞ p̳̿͟͞l̳̿͟͞a̳̿͟͞y̳̿͟͞l̳̿͟͞i̳̿͟͞s̳̿͟͞t̳̿͟͞.. 🅸🅵 🆈🅾🆄 🆁🅴🅰🅻🅻🆈 🆆🅰🅽🆃 🅿🆁🅾🅾🅵 🆃🅷🅸🆂 🅴🅽🆃🅸🆁🅴 🅿🅻🅰🆃🅵🅾🆁🅼 🅸🆂 🅰 🆂🅲🅰🅼 🆈🅾🆄 🅲🅰🅽 🅻🅸🆃🅴🆁🅰🅻🅻🆈 🆂🅴🅴 🆅🅴🆁🆈 🆅🅸🅳🅴🅾 🆃🅷🅰🆃 🆈🅾🆄 🆃🆄🅱🅴 🅲🅰🅽🅲🅴🅻🅴🅳 🅵🆁🅾🅼 🅼🅴 🅵🅾🆁 🆃🅷🅴 🅻🅰🆂🆃 4 🆈🅴🅰🆁🆂 🆂🆃🅸🅻🅻 🆄🅿 🆆🅸🆃🅷 🆉🅴🆁🅾 🅿🆁🅾🅱🅻🅴🅼🆂 🅰🆃 🆁🆄🅼🅱🅻🅴 You tubes perspective of what fair use law represents , what communications decency act 230 means what hr21 and what infringement means in reference of the very foundation of creation which is noise-communication. I mean for goodness sake, discussion- a "scientific process to be reviewed by peers" is science- literally the last phase of proving a scietific theory, requires discussion- they tried to end that last time, look what happened.. As far as flat earther, I'm not one. Good thing they don't pay you to diagnose- huh? lol. I know who you are.