05Nov2023. Current report. Qualitative vs. Quantitative.

42:42-1:07:34
1:41:?? -2:00.02

Current Report from Tomsk Observatory; Reading, on a relatively clear day. Qualitative vs. Quantitative.
Source: ( https://www.disclosurenews.it/schumann-resonance-last-image/ )
Relatively calm conditions today.
I love these days without much activity, so I can explain better what the actual Schumann resonances are. In addition to how this relates to the reporting technology used.
First, it's important to understand that this visual aid, is a screen capture of the Spectrogram, AS WELL AS the 3 panels of dependency information.
The top panel is the spectrogram, which takes the information from the lower 3 panels, to combine them into one 'three dimensional' image. The spectrogram is what is called "The Schumann."
"The Schumann" refers to the spectrogram...and not necessary what the actual atmosphere is doing.
The panels below the spectrogram are: Amplitude; Quality; Frequency, respectively.
Amplitude is the signal that comes from a dipole-type antennae. This detects the electrical content, which is voltage, or a power rating of +/-. This is what is called 'charge'. The upright spikes (ZERO is at the top of the spectrogram) are showing the measurements of VOLTAGE.
Quality is the magnetic flux of the signals. Quality is loosely based on 'Q-factor'; which technically relates to the damping of a resonator. The atmosphere is the "resonator" for this purpose (not sure what info anyone can extract from seeing this data as 'Q-factor?) Quality measures the magnetic content, based on pico-Tesla scale.
Frequency is the measurement in kilometers of the wave peak to peak.
Coloring The Chart.
Firstly, let me just say that decoding the color information is the most difficult, and most meaningful aspect of determining what the charts are actually saying. Honestly, what is the point of being religious in your practice of checking these readings, if someone is just going to invent symptoms, or physiological conditions that accompany the colors of the chart.
Keep in mind, that the colors of the chart, are used to express a 3 dimensional image, based on two separate types of antennae, The dipole and the copper-wound induction coils are detecting two separate types of signals. By its nature, the Power/Voltage rating is stronger than the magnetic-side measurement of the Quality, or magnetic fluctuation.
Quantitative VS. Qualitative.
These are two words that need to get known, quickly. The SPECTROGRAM is QUALITATIVE. The dependency panels are QUANTITATIVE. Qualitative refers to a view, or chart, or perspective that is not actual measurements, but a manner of showing all the elements in relationship, based on the constraints of the scope, or meter--simply put. It's an over all relationship of the many parts together, working as a system.
The spectrogram, "The Schumann" is a Qualitative view...not actual measurements. For example, the white spike is always going to "peg [the top of] the meter", because it is scaled to fit into the allotted space.
QUANTITATIVE. Dependencies are the 3 lower panels of the actual measurements: Amplitude, Quality, Frequency. This is the so-called raw data (after being filtered, of course) collected quantitatively--associated to an actual number value on either side of the line graph.
The dependencies are giving you actual, numerical measurements, in 4 modes, which are given as color information. Decrypting and decoding this information may be the most difficult thing that you have to do, learning about the Schumann resonances.
Maybe so, maybe not...
The Dependencies.
The 3 dependencies are considered to be "axes" of movement of the 'stylus', or the color-making apparatus, in the spectrogram. The 'stylus' is what plots the colors.
Each color represents a "MODE" of operation of the measurements.
There are 4 colours for each dependency of Amplitude, Quality, Frequency.
Here's the trick: What are resonances?
This is the ALL of everything here, in my view. Schumann was the man's name. In real life, he was a professor. Her, his name represents a visual aid. It's much-less important to remember the man's name, than what he discovered.
The discovery named after Schumann is that atmospheric resonances. Professor Schumann himself describes these resonances as the effect of striking a bell, and the reverberations that come afterwards.
Resonances are standing waves.
This is a collision, or interference of multiple fundamental, or original waves that break on each other, to create an oscillation, or hum that stays "in place."
The element of "hum", or vibrating but staying in place, is difficult for alot of people to grasp. Resonances do no move, nor propagate; they are the product, or difference, between two original waves--which do move, or propagate.
The color code of the spectrogram is the most difficult part of this to figure-out. There is no easy, nor intuitive way to look at the color information and just 'figure it out.' If you have no previous experience in reading VU meters, or graphs, or sensor meter readings, then this is going to be a new experience with a fairly steep learning curve.
The spectrogram is not picking-up, nor detecting anything from the actual environment. The most colorful report is not the technically accurate one. That's not how it works...you don't get the full color version as the representative of objective reality.
The most fully-coloured one is a mediated version of reality. It's not there intentionally to snare you...
but does serve admirably in this function.
In order to grasp the coloring schema, we gotta go back to resonances...what are resonances?
These are standing waves, or interference patterns that develop as the waves cancel-out, or reinforce each other. As the fundamental, or original waves interact, interfere with each other, these patterns develop in place; in situ, is the phrase. Again, they do not propagate.
The Schumann resonances happen right there on the spot, they do not move, nor propagate. The graphical reports are attempting to show you a contrived image of standing wave patterns of the atmospheric electro-magnetics, or radio waves, in the immediate environment.
Your results nearest to you will vary. Yet, might be close, depending where you are. The information here, was detected in Tomsk, Russia. This is important to know.
The color information of the Modes is difficult to fathom, for those who are not familiar with harmonics. Schumann is not simply one resonance frequency, it is a series of resonance harmonics that build, or establish over time.
The MODES are the standard way of measuring, as a relative, or relational aspect the two inter-dependent forces of electricity and magnetism. Modes use a relative scale, which features a coloring protocol that's engineered to represent a 3 dimensional image of resonances and standing waves. This is extremely complex, complicated, technical stuff.
It's not intuitive, simply for looking at it. The coloring protocol is not showing us a physical representation of the atmosphere, as alot of people believe. There are technical factors that have to be understood, when interpreting the blended colors.
If one believes that the spectrogram's visual representation is an analog, or physical representation of "incoming white light," "ascension energies," "incoming gamma, 5D energies"; then this core belief is going to provide trouble when reading this technically-accurately. Feel free to believe whatever make you comfortable. My place here is not to provide you with more fodder for a belief system.
The Modes system of measurement, is a relationship between the power/charge of the electric-side of the dipole antenna; against the measurements of the magnetic-induction coil, (which is in reality that which is measuring and detecting Schumann's resonances).
I am a technician. I'm always thinking of the "signal path" of the electric circuit. Or, the physical picture of "the thing itself" which is attached to the principle, or the equation, etc.
I've done a vide on this topic. I've posted the manuscript here. This is a topic that can be gone into at length, of the meaning of the Modes relative to how they are used to measure the waves, mathematically. This mathmatical step needs to happen before a color can be assigned.
Those who are familiar with statistics might be able to conceptualize the modes from this perspective. Having taking an introductory class in statistics, as part of my Sociology Course, I got a brief intrduction to this concept; as part of the Mean, Median, and Mode.
A way to look at this is to see where things naturally "clump-up", then base the computational model around this 'figure', or shape. This is where we look at the shape/size (slope) of the wave. The Mode is a way of comparison of the slope, or the shape of the wave, based on the charge, or the current.
Because these are inversely related, you can compare with the voltage/charge, or current/magnetics together. There's 4 modes here to work with 1=White; 2=Yellow; 3=Red; 4=Green. The background at rest is dark, dark blue.
White mode represents the most active, relative to wave height, of a wave; YET, the electric-side, the Voltage is not a wave, properly. Frequency is peak-to-peak measurement. Hertz is a rate/which is count of wave peaks--not distance between them.
High peak activity, the Voltage, or charge of the system becomes the relative standard for the value of the scale being measured. There is an actual number, then there is the relational value, one to the other between both axes, relative to the graph.
Mode 1 is 1:1. Mode 2 is 1:2. Mode 3 is 1:3. Mode 4 is 1:4.
This simple-enough equation, when applied to the colors of the dependency information, gives one the "paint by number schemata" to decypher the color information presented on the spectrogram.
_
Patreon: ( https://www.patreon.com/posts/04-nov-2023-from-92297429... )
Wordpress: ( https://giantsintheland.wordpress.com/.../04-nov-2023.../ )
YT community: ( https://www.youtube.com/.../UC2yopCLcJ9YU7Jp.../community... )