Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade Pleasure Marriages
Both Side Issues Exposed Islamic State Clerics Secret Sex Trade This documentary exposes "dodgy" practices of the BBC when filming the controversial earlier 2019 programmed 'Undercover With The Clerics: Iraq's Secret Sex Trade'. Widely condemned by the Shia Muslim world, accusations against this award winning doc include lies, poor translations and Islamophobia. BBC Deceit sets the record straight!
What’s with the outrage with the BBC documentary? Why are people shocked with what’s happening in Iraq, Iran and other Muslim countries when it comes to sexual practices? What did Muslims expect would happen when this religion is one sordid orgy and has euphemism available for all sorts of sexual arrangements. It’s all allowed in this faith (polygamy, polyamory, one night stands) in the name of nikkah or mutah/misyar. It’s all a play on words.
This refutation is just a pathetic PR attempt to convince a “modern naive” Muslim that it doesn’t happen because they aren’t able to fully grasp what this religion truly is. Read the colourful lives of the Prophet and his progeny. The creation of Mutah was so unnecessary when Islam already allows polygamy (4 wives) with conditions.
The creation was to Islamically justify further debauchery for all the “pious” Muslim men. What a joke! Islam’s motto should be- “made by weak and insecure men for other men.” The fastest growing religion for degenerates like Andrew Tate. Why else is the Iranian government so upset with women wanting to remove their hijabs? See it for what it is and maybe you wouldn’t be shocked why it happens in the Muslim world. At least in the western world we call these sick prurient individuals what they are pedophiles and abusers.
Great effort but what a stupid documentary to expose on your end. This documentary is more biased than the claim against BBC. The documentary on the secret sex trade was not made to promote the activities of charities and other programs. The documentary did exactly what it was supposed to do. It "exposed" the dirt which sadly Exists.
They are showing a sad reality of the abuse of Mutah in this particular society/culture. You cannot deny that. They did not imply that the holy sites were responsible for this abuse. And seeking a statement from Sayed Sistani was also a responsible move by them. It actually educated us Shia women and men on how to go about Mutah. Stop crying vicitm. Fix the problem and not waste your energy on condemning a documentary that was targetting a Specific form of Abuse which is Real and a sad reality we face today.
This is not just the teaching of Shia Muslims but the teaching of Islam in general. It’s a fixed-time arrangement between a man and a woman that dissolves once the duration expires. In the Quran it says: "And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty.
And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done)" - Quran (4:24) "O you who believe! do not forbid (yourselves) the good things which Allah has made lawful for you and do not exceed the limits; surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits" - Quran (5:87)
Surprisingly the context for this verse of temporary marriage is also found in Sahih Hadith. In this case, trading an article of clothing for a few days of access to a woman's body. Narrated Abdullah: “We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the Prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the Prophet ). "Shall we castrate ourselves?"
But the Prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: "O you who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you." - Sahih Bukhari (60:139). By calling this a "good thing," Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam really stood traditional morality on its ear.
By making your film you’ve extended the BBC’s documentary and proved everything to be true. With all the video evidence, still not one person has been prosecuted.
All religions seek to justify their sleazy practices and predate such practices to the times of their gods. Even a fairly new religion such as Mormonism justified plural marriage and denial of priesthood to the blacks by the scriptures.
Religions are truly opiates that desensitize people and allow them to do crazy things with legitimacy. When their evil acts are exposed, they run for cover pointing their fingers at others.
A very important documentary to consider. Naturally there was a lot of backlash regarding the exposure of this problem. Using the justification that the girl has to agree in order for this to happen and cant be forced into a pleasure marriage is poor reasoning... What woman or child for that matter can not be persuaded in vulnerable times?
It was undeniable that Al-Sayyid Ali Al-Husseini Al-Sistani wrote in his earlier works that it was permissible for a woman of 9 years old to marry. Regardless of what rights he has endeavored to make for woman, perhaps reading about the good things Pablo Escobar did may help put that in perspective. Too often we make and see our leaders as we need them to be rather than as they are, which in fact are just like us. Unfortunately child exploitation in religions is not a new concept.
The Catholic Church has already paid 4 billion in US dollars, So Far, in lawsuits for child exploitation. Buddhists temples and child exploitation is also a problem. Having morals and a religion is okay, provided that it is not a religion that is as a whole, causing the problems.
For we thus we have become participants of such dynamics and now bear responsibility for such actions. So much denial in our thinking to keep our comfort zone of family and culture preserved. I'm grateful the BBC exposed a fraction of what has been going on in this part of the world.
The Islamic State issues guide on when it’s okay to beat your sex slave and kill them. Earlier this month, ideologues belonging to the extremist Islamic State published a pamphlet outlining guidelines for how its fighters can treat female slaves in their custody. The document, titled "Questions and Answers on Taking Captives and Slaves," was supposedly compiled by the Islamic State's "Research and Fatwa Department," according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, which monitors jihadist activity.
By some accounts, the Islamic State has kidnapped thousands of women during its months of rampage and slaughter this year. These include at least 2,500 Yazidi women, members of a religious sect deemed apostate by the jihadists. The shocking testimony of Yazidi women who escaped the Islamic State's clutches has given us a chilling insight into the militants' brutality and vulgarity. A YouTube video circulated in November appeared to show the jihadists joking around about the many sex slaves in their possession and the rapes they carry out.
The pamphlet says it is permissible to capture any "unbelieving" women and have sex with her "immediately" if she is a virgin. If she is not, though, it mandates that "her uterus must be purified" first. It offers no further detail on what that means.
The rules for how militants should handle their slaves follow. Among the most shocking are that it is “permissible” to rape a female slave “immediately after taking possession of her” and that it is “permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn't reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse”, without explanation of what that means.
Speaking to The Independent, Quilliam researcher Charlie Winter said: “The roots of this document can easily be traced back to some of Islamic State’s most active propagandists, something that leaves little doubt in my mind about its credibility.
“The content, while it is abhorrent and shocking, is not surprising – we know that IS ideologues have justified and legitimated slavery in past publications.”
The 27 "questions and answers" laid out in the pamphlet vary from the grotesque to the farcical. A man, it warns, "may not kiss the female slave of another."
https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/09/05/slavery-isis-rules
Here is the Islamic State's guidance regarding when it's permissible to beat your female slave:
"It is permissible to beat the female slave as a [form of] darb ta'deeb [disciplinary beating], [but] it is forbidden to [use] darb al-takseer [literally, breaking beating], [darb] al-tashaffi [beating for the purpose of achieving gratification], or [darb] al-ta'dheeb [torture beating]. Further, it is forbidden to hit the face."
It also gives a jihadist the right to have sex with (in reality, rape) a pre-pubescent girl: "It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn't reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse."
For the Islamic State, such documents are a means of spreading their propaganda and burnishing their hardline, extremist chops. "The content, while it is abhorrent and shocking, is not surprising," said Charlie Winter, a researcher at Quilliam, an anti-jihadist think tank in London, in an interview with the Independent. "We know that IS ideologues have justified and legitimated slavery in past publications."
Following today’s attack in Nice and following on from the murder of Samuel Paty on 16 October, the World Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, His Holiness, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad has condemned all forms of terrorism and extremism and called for mutual understanding and dialogue between all peoples and nations.
His Holiness, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad states:
“The murder and beheading of Samuel Paty and the attack in Nice earlier today must be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Such grievous attacks are completely against the teachings of Islam. Our religion does not permit terrorism or extremism under any circumstances and anyone who claims otherwise acts against the teachings of the Holy Quran and contrary to the noble character of the Holy Prophet of Islam (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).
As the worldwide Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, I extend our deepest sympathies to the loved ones of the victims and to the French nation. Let it be clear that our condemnation and hatred of such attacks is not something new but has always been our position and stance. The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community (peace be upon him) and his Successors have always categorically rejected all forms of violence or bloodshed in the name of religion.
The fallout from this heinous act has further exacerbated the tensions between the Islamic world and the West and between Muslims living in France and the rest of society. We consider this to be a source of deep regret and a means of further undermining the peace and stability of the world. We must all join together to root out all forms of extremism and to encourage mutual understanding and tolerance. From our perspective, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community will spare no effort in our mission to foster a better understanding of the true and peaceful teachings of Islam in the world.”
Exposing Real History Of The Nation Of Islam & Is Not Religion Of Peace And Justice
This is the origins and true history of the NOI, which includes interviews, clips, and historical evidence about major figures in the Black Muslim movement. Some of the things/people mentioned is Noble Drew Ali, Wallace Fard Muhammad, Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, Louis (X) Farrakhan, Clarence 13X, Warith Deen Mohammed, Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and most important what the Netfix Documentary "Who Killed Malcolm X?" did NOT tell you about the Assassination of El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.
Left-Wing Vs. Right-Wing Ideologies Are Two Political Extremities Stop Killing People
We The People's of Left-Wing and Right-Wing ideologies and are two political extremities that differ in their outlook and applications. Left-wing beliefs are liberal in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the government, while people on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role and especially the power of the government is minimized.
Left-wing is characterized by equality, freedom, rights, progress, and reform, while right-wing is characterized by duty, hierarchy, authority, order, tradition, and nationalism. In terms of economic policies, right-wing believes there should be less government regulation on business and that private enterprise is the best way to stimulate economic growth, while left-wing believes in more government regulation to prevent abuses by businesses and that a mixed economy is best for growth. Right-wing politics is centered around beliefs that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable and natural, with this belief being supported by natural law or tradition.
Child Male-To-Female Gender Affirmation Total Laparoscopic Sigmoid Vaginoplasty
Child Male-To-Female Gender Affirmation And California bill highlighting gender affirmation in child custody cases moves forward. California lawmakers in the State Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday moved forward with a measure that would require courts to consider a parent's acceptance of their child's gender identity in custody or visitation cases. U.S.A. New Sharia Law Rules 2022 and Kids Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Rules 2023 Kids Can Now Start At Age 8 Yrs. Old Puberty Blockers Drugs Per The President Biden's Administration has confirmed that the legal age of consent for oral sex and to marriage will be lowered to age 8 yrs old starting Feb. 14th. 2023
Male to Female Sex Reassignment Surgery Live ** Very Graphic ** Think Twice Guys ?
Feel The Joy of Discovering a New You and How to Become a Woman In Real Life With Sex Reassignment Surgery. Yes Male to Female Transition You To Can Become A NCAA Women’s Swimming Star Like Riley Gaines and A Swimming Championships For You Too. What You Need To Know About An Sex Transition.
Gender Identity - Gender identity is one’s internal sense of being male, female, some combination, or another gender. Gender identity may or may not align with sex or gender assigned at birth.
Transgender - Somebody who is transgender has a gender identity different from that traditionally associated with sex assigned at birth.
WoW This Looks Fun Lady's Keyhole Top Surgery For Female to Male Transgender
A Teen who claims to be "gender neutral" is to have her 30D breasts removed to eradicate her female features. Opi Baron, 19, has planned drastic surgery to have her breast tissue removed and become completely flat-chested. She said: "You are brought up and taught from a young age that there is only 'boy' and 'girl' and just two boxes that you can fit into but that's not the case. "Instead of it being black or white, male or female, it's like there are a whole range of shades in the middle which is where I am.
Secrets Meeting Biden Said New U.S.A. Laws Coming Age of Consent Is To Be 8 Yrs. Old
UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up
UN New Legal Principles Launched On International Women’s and Trans Women Day to advance decriminalization efforts In March 2023
tps://web.archive.org/web/20230416234047/https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf
“As the mother of a trans child, it is jarring to know that TGI youth are at a higher risk of depression, mental health crises, self-harm and suicide than their cisgender peers,” said Assembly member Lori Wilson, the bill's author, in a statement. “The TGI Youth Empowerment Act provides California the opportunity to take one step closer to building a safer, more dignified, and equitable world for TGI youth and their families.”
Muhammad Married A 9-Year-Old Lady Ayesha Because Messenger of God Said So
Is it true that Muhammad married a child bride by the name of Ayesha when he was 53 and she was 9 years old? If so, how do Muslims justify this from their “exemplary” Prophet? The well-established, but not altogether agreed upon, tradition of Lady Ayesha’s age at the time of marrying Prophet Muhammad comes from a hadith in one of the most authentic collections – Sahih al-Bukhari in which Ayesha, herself, states: “The Messenger of God married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.”
American Muslims Facts vs. Fiction vs. Islamic Militant Organization vs, Sharia Law
American Muslims Facts vs. Fiction is an 11-minute film that uses research from The Gallup Organization, The Pew Forum, Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, The U.S. Counterterrorism Center and other leading research organizations to address questions Americans ask about their Muslim neighbors. The film debunks stereotypes and separates many of the prevailing fictions about Islam and American Muslims by featuring leading researchers, religious authorities and the results of studies conducted by these organizations.
Why Do Far-Right Groups Burn The Quran or Is Quran Hate Propaganda Question
Several far-right and anti-Muslim groups in Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands burned copies of the Quran in public places in 2022. Anti-fascist demonstrators outnumbered far-right supporters more than 20 to one in Denmark as an English Defence League-led attempt to form a pan-European movement was humiliated. Estimates suggested as few as 160 defence league members from several countries gathered at the inaugural far-right summit in Aarhus for the European counter-jihad meeting, devised to "send a clear message to the leaders of Europe" that Islamism would not be tolerated.
Islam And The Undeniable Truth - Jihadists and Islamic State Say Death To America !
Undeniable Truth 1400 years of Islam history in a few minutes from Brigitte Gabriel was born in the Marjeyoun District of Lebanon to a Maronite Christian couple, a first and only child after over twenty years of marriage. She recalls that during the Lebanese Civil War, Islamic militants launched an assault on a Lebanese military base near her family's house and destroyed her home. Gabriel, who was ten years old at the time, was injured by shrapnel in the attack. She says that she and her parents were forced to live underground in all that remained, an 8-by-10-foot (2.4 by 3.0 m) bomb shelter for seven years, with only a small kerosene heater, no sanitary systems, no electricity or running water, and little food. She says she had to crawl in a roadside ditch to a spring for water to evade Muslim snipers.
Islamic Law and Courts Are Alive and Well in U.S.A. vs. USC 1st Amendment Laws
Americans often react to the idea of Sharia with horror and repugnance. That isn’t warranted. The complex interplay between American society and immigrants’ religious beliefs has a long and rich history in the U.S.A. Teenage Girls Who are forced to marry. Hands amputated as punishment for theft.
Although Muslim women are more likely to have their daughter circumcised, the findings suggest the importance of a collective rather than individual Muslim identity for the continuation of the practice. Keywords 200,000+female genital cutting a year, intergenerational transmission, convention theory, Burkina Faso Female genital cutting, also known as female genital mutilation or female circumcision, is a term used to describe operations on female genitalia ranging from a small nick in the clitoris to total removal of the clitoris and labia.
Terror Slavery Chronicles & Other Woman Escapes Sexual Slavery Auction ** GRAPHIC **
So Terror Slavery Groups ISIS and U.S.A. and Others Wide World Groups Now Has Sex Slave Rape and Death Guidelines and Slavery Chronicles and There is maps of underground sex-slave bars in the American. Always fascinated by the concept of human slavery and how it worked. (So far I've have seen over 60,000+ ISIS or Muslim and Others auction-block sex slave ad) How was it own a human and see him/her as just a property. How was it to be owned, right-less by law, being bought and sold side by side to other animals. How was it to be part of a community where, by pure luck mostly, you might own every thing and live as a king without any effort, or you might own nothing even yourself So Here I Imagine a world where slavery became legal again. I write some times as a master/mistress, sometimes as a slave and some times as just an observer. I will even share some posts of interest, and write some true historical excerpts about slavery. Excuse my English, I am not a native speaker P.S. It is pure fantasy Just when you thought ISIS couldn’t get any worse, they have now put out guidelines for how to rape your sex slaves. "Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when "owners" of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.
Secret Pedophile's Watch Child Beauty Pageant Glitter Girls Age 4 Thru 8 Yrs. Old
A child beauty pageant is a beauty contest featuring contestants starting at age 4 to under 16 years of age. Competition categories may include talent, interview, sportswear, casual wear, swimwear, western wear, theme wear, outfit of choice, decade wear, and evening wear. Depending on the type of pageant system (glitz or natural), contestants may be found wearing anything from makeup to fake teeth, known as flippers, as well as elaborate hairstyles and custom-designed fitted outfits to present their routines on stage.
In A Secrets Meeting Per U.S.A. New Sharia Law Rules 2022 and Kids Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Rules 2023 Kids Can Now Start At Age 8 Yrs. Old Puberty Blockers Drugs Per President Joe Biden's Administration has confirmed that the legal age of consent for sex and marriage will be lowered to 8 yrs old starting February 16th. 2023 During a speech Tuesday afternoon, Biden stated ‘We have to do it... The age, the kids, they should be about this old.’ He then held up a gesture suggesting the historic decrease. New World Order Plan To Control Secret Evidence Revealed Death UN 21 Agenda U.S.A.
Per Biden Saying 42 U.S. Code Chapter 21B - RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION Satan Worship and Child Sacrifice Law and Secret Pedophile's Rules - Freedom of religion is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits laws establishing a national religion or impeding the free exercise of religion for its citizens. While the First Amendment enforces the “separation of church and state” it doesn’t exclude religion from public life. From the colonial era to present, religion has played a major role in politics in the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court over the years has ruled inconsistently on matters of religious freedom, such as the display of religious symbols in government buildings.
Child sacrifice is the ritualistic killing of children in order to please or appease a deity, supernatural beings, or sacred social order, tribal, group or national loyalties in order to achieve a desired result.
Ritual Child Sacrifice Is Alive and Well in 21st Century America In this nation, children's body parts are sacrificed for witchcraft and food too.
Disney Pedophile's Branson Necker Island 40 Miles To Epstein Orgy Island Global Elite - https://rumble.com/v2dim5k-disney-pedophiles-branson-necker-island-40-miles-to-epstein-orgy-island-glo.html - Disney Cruise Charged Kids $75 To Visit Epstein's 'Pedophile Island' A Disney owned and operated a cruise line in the Caribbean offered a snorkeling trip for children to Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious “Pedophile Island” for years.
Pedophile and A Pizza Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Evidence - https://rumble.com/v2bbfv2-pedophile-and-a-pizza-secret-human-trafficking-and-child-sex-ring-evidence-.html - Of course it's possible that the only Pedophile using these words and their kid sex friends. It may be their own private language.
Powerful video reveals brutal reality of life for child brides and refugee girls. More than 100 girls took part in a powerful demonstration about the perilous future faced by many young female refugees. Many of the young girls dressed as child brides as they added a twist onto the popular mannequin challenge – a video during which participants stay as still as possible – by turning it into an important piece of activism. Text over on the video reads: ‘As refugees, girls are more likely to be caught in a vacuum of violence, early marriage and denial of education. ‘Refugee girls are too often invisible. Their voices lost.’ In the footage, many of the child brides are accompanied by much older men to signify the all too often fate of young female refugees.
Slavery And Rules For Male And Female Prisoners of War For Rape and Sexual Intercourse With Baby, Kids, Children, Teens, Women And Sexual Intercourse With Corpse Of Dead Women And Sex With Dead Behead Corpse Of Men And Women. See The IsIs, Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Islamic State Rules And Laws.
Modern slavery takes many forms, but most slaves are forced to work in the shadows. Those who control modern slaves—whether men compelled to work on Thai fishing boats, domestic workers trapped in the homes of their Saudi employers, children ordered to beg in Senegal, bonded workers in India, or sex workers trafficked in the West—usually shun publicity because treating human beings as mere chattel can be criminally prosecuted and cause moral revulsion.
The self-proclaimed Islamic State, or ISIS, is a rare exception. Much as it openly flouts the global prohibition of summary execution, often with unspeakable cruelty, it has published an attempt to justify its subjugation of non-Muslim women and girls in sexual bondage. Its argument is not an academic exercise: Human Rights Watch has interviewed Yazidi women and girls who have escaped ISIS captivity. They describe a system of organized rape and sexual assault, sexual slavery, and forced marriage.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/09/05/slavery-isis-rules
The excerpts from the ISIS pamphlet printed below—posted on a pro-ISIS Twitter account and generally considered authentic—use a question-and-answer format to set forth rules for having sex with captured and enslaved women and girls who are not Muslim.* What is striking is that, in the minds of its authors, this is not a lawless document. It sets forth an interpretation of sharia, or Islamic law, albeit an extreme one. Far from pure licentiousness, it is filled with legal constraints. Yet by treating captured non-Muslim women as subject to the sexual whims of those who control them, ISIS disregards nearly universal injunctions against slavery and rape.
The ISIS pamphlet does not mean that its members who enslave and rape women necessarily act with Islam in mind. Like any ruthless group, ISIS undoubtedly includes many who are attracted by the opportunity to subjugate and brutalize others regardless of the rationalization. Yet ISIS’s effort to justify its conduct through sharia law highlights the importance of countering this legal claim, both by those qualified to speak for Islamic law and by those able to enforce the prohibitions of international human rights law.
Question 1: What is al-sabi?
Al-Sabi is a woman from among ahl al-harb [the people of war] who has been captured by Muslims.
Question 2: What makes al-sabi permissible?
What makes al-sabi permissible [i.e., what makes it permissible to take such a woman captive] is [her] unbelief. Unbelieving [women] who were captured and brought into the abode of Islam are permissible to us, after the imam distributes them [among us].
Question 3: Can all unbelieving women be taken captive?
There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [who are characterized by] original unbelief [kufr asli], such as the kitabiyat [women from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians] and polytheists. However, [the scholars] are disputed over [the issue of] capturing apostate women. The consensus leans toward forbidding it, though some people of knowledge think it permissible. We [ISIS] lean toward accepting the consensus….
Question 4: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive?
It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: “[Successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5–6].”…
Question 5: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive immediately after taking possession [of her]?
If she is a virgin, he [her master] can have intercourse with her immediately after taking possession of her. However, if she isn’t, her uterus must be purified [first]….
Question 6: Is it permissible to sell a female captive?
It is permissible to buy, sell, or give as a gift female captives and slaves, for they are merely property, which can be disposed of as long as that doesn’t cause [the Muslim ummah] any harm or damage.
Question 7: Is it permissible to separate a mother from her children through [the act of] buying and selling?
It is not permissible to separate a mother from her prepubescent children through buying, selling, or giving away [a captive or slave]. [But] it is permissible to separate them if the children are grown and mature.
Question 8: If two or more [men] buy a female captive together, does she then become [sexually] permissible to each of them?
It is forbidden to have intercourse with a female captive if [the master] does not own her exclusively. One who owns [a captive] in partnership [with others] may not have sexual intercourse with her until the other [owners] sell or give him [their share].
Question 9: If the female captive was impregnated by her owner, can he then sell her?
He can’t sell her if she becomes the mother of a child….
Question 10: If a man dies, what is the law regarding the female captive he owned?
Female captives are distributed as part of his estate, just as all [other parts] of his estate [are distributed]. However, they may only provide services, not intercourse, if a father or [one of the] sons has already had intercourse with them, or if several [people] inherit them in partnership.
Question 11: May a man have intercourse with the female slave of his wife?
A man may not have intercourse with the female slave of his wife, because [the slave] is owned by someone else.
Question 12: May a man kiss the female slave of another, with the owner’s permission?
A man may not kiss the female slave of another, for kissing [involves] pleasure, and pleasure is prohibited unless [the man] owns [the slave] exclusively.
Question 13: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female slave who has not reached puberty?
It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn’t reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse; however if she is not fit for intercourse, then it is enough to enjoy her without intercourse.
Question 14: What private parts of the female slave’s body must be concealed during prayer?
Her private body parts [that must be concealed] during prayer are the same as those [that must be concealed] outside [prayer], and they [include] everything besides the head, neck, hands, and feet.
Question 15: May a female slave meet foreign men without wearing a hijab?
A female slave is allowed to expose her head, neck, hands, and feet in front of foreign men if fitna [enticement] can be avoided. However, if fitna is present, or of there is fear that it will occur, then it [i.e., exposing these body parts becomes] forbidden.
Question 16: Can two sisters be taken together while taking slaves?
It is permissible to have two sisters, a female slave and her aunt [her father’s sister], or a female slave and her aunt [from her mother’s side]. But they cannot be together during intercourse, [and] whoever has intercourse with one of them cannot have intercourse with the other, due to the general [consensus] over the prohibition of this.
Question 17: What is al-’azl?
Al-’azl is refraining from ejaculating on a woman’s pudendum [i.e., coitus interruptus].
Question 18: May a man use the al-’azl [technique] with his female slave?
A man is allowed [to use] al-’azl during intercourse with his female slave with or without her consent.
Question 19: Is it permissible to beat a female slave?
It is permissible to beat the female slave as a [form of] darb ta’deeb [disciplinary beating], [but] it is forbidden to [use] darb al-takseer [literally, breaking beating], [darb] al-tashaffi [beating for the purpose of achieving gratification], or [darb] al-ta’dheeb [torture beating]. Further, it is forbidden to hit the face.
Question 20: What is the ruling regarding a female slave who runs away from her master?
A male or female slave’s running away [from their master] is among the gravest of sins….
Question 21: What is the earthly punishment of a female slave who runs away from her master?
She [i.e., the female slave who runs away from her master] has no punishment according to the sharia of Allah; however, she is [to be] reprimanded [in such a way that] deters others like her from escaping.
Question 22: Is it permissible to marry a Muslim [slave] or a kitabiyya [i.e., Jewish or Christian] female slave?
It is impermissible for a free [man] to marry Muslim or kitabiyat female slaves, except for those [men] who feared to [commit] a sin, that is, the sin of fornication….
Question 24: If a man marries a female slave who is owned by someone else, who is allowed to have intercourse with her?
A master is prohibited from having intercourse with his female slave who is married to someone else; instead, the master receives her service, [while] the husband [gets to] enjoy her [sexually].
Question 25: Are the huddoud [Koranic punishments] applied to female slaves?
If a female slave committed what necessitated the enforcement of a hadd [on her], a hadd [is then] enforced on her—however, the hadd is reduced by half within the hudud that accepts reduction by half….
Question 26: What is the ruling regarding a female slave having sexual intercourse with her dead corpse ? ((this question is missing in most copy of this text)) ISIS pamphlet does talk about 27 "questions and answers" See Islam Religious Authority For More Info.
See Slavery And Rules For Male And Female Prisoners of War For Rape and Sexual Intercourse With Baby, Kids, Children, Teens, Women And Sexual Intercourse With Corpse Of Dead Women And Sex With Dead Behead Corpse Of Men And Women. See The IsIs, Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Islamic State Rules And Laws. Also See A Clerics Of Islam Religious Authority For More Info.
Question 27: What is the reward for freeing a slave girl?
Allah the exalted said [in the Koran]: “And what can make you know what is [breaking through] the difficult pass [hell]? It is the freeing of a slave.” And [the prophet Muhammad] said: “Whoever frees a believer Allah frees every organ of his body from hellfire.”
The text, which follows the Twitter version precisely, is available at www.memrijttm.org.
Yes 16 Report Per Page and Over 1194+ Total Pages Starting From 2006 Thur 2023... Thanks
The Exploitation, Beheading, And Rape Of Female Prisoners of War Is so-called 'sexual slavery' permitted in Islam? No, says Anne-Marie, who explains the Quran's REAL teachings on female prisoners of war. She shows how sexual assault and ill-treatment of prisoners was not allowed, and how such prisoners were either released or could earn their freedom. No other religion has such humane and beneficial teachings on this difficult subject, and the World could have benefitted from them after World War Two 1937 Thru 1945.
Islamic Teachings on Female Prisoners of War The issue of slavery in relation to Islamic teachings is perhaps one of the most misunderstood subjects. Critics use the example of slavery to paint Islam as a violent religion that only seeks to oppress people. Intricately related to this issue is that of female prisoners of war, who are sometimes referred to as “those whom the right hands possess”, in the Holy Quran.
In this article, I will discuss the issue of slavery, Islamic methods to bring it to an end, and the numerous misunderstandings related to the concept of female prisoners of war.
First of all, it should be clear that Islam did not introduce slavery to the world. On the contrary, Islam condemned slavery in clear terms and prohibited making slaves in any way whatsoever. The confusion arises when prisoners of war are seen as “slaves” by the critics of Islam. It is true that prisoners of war may appear to be slaves, but they are taken in the middle of a battle in order to guard one’s country against the harms of the enemy.
A Slave or a Member of the Family?
When we study the teachings of Islam regarding such so-called “slaves”, we find that they cannot be termed “slaves” as perceived in the minds of many. Islam on the other hand instructs Muslims to be kind to their slaves:
And worship Allah and associate naught with Him, and show kindness to parents, and to kindred, and orphans, and the needy, and to the neighbour that is a kinsman and the neighbour that is a stranger, and the companion by your side, and the wayfarer, and those whom your right hands possess. Surely, Allah loves not the proud and the boastful. [4:37]
Emphasizing the same teaching, the Holy Prophet(sa) says:
Slaves are your brothers whom Allah has put under your control, so feed them with the same food that you eat, clothe them with the same clothes you wear, and do not burden them with so much that they are overwhelmed; if you do burden them, then help them. [Sunan Ibn Majah, Book of Etiquette, Chapter: Beneficence towards slaves; Book 33, Hadith 34]
These are just highlights of many Islamic teachings on the kind treatment of slaves. If these teachings are followed, it would mean that a “slave” no longer remains a slave and would instead be like a member of the family.
Furthermore, Islam teaches the emancipation of slaves in numerous verses of the Quran such as the following:
And what should make thee know what the ascent is? It is the freeing of a slave. [90:13-14]
Similarly, the Holy Prophet(sa) said:
He who emancipates a slave, Allah will set free from Hell, limb for limb.[i]
In light of these teachings, Muslims played a great role in the emancipation of slaves. According to historical records, Prophet Muhammad(sa) himself freed 63 slaves during his life-time, Hazrat ‘Ā’ishah(ra) freed 67, Hazrat ‘Abbās(ra) freed 70, Hazrat ‘Abdullāh bin ‘Umar(ra) freed 1,000, and Hazrat ‘Abdur Raḥmān bin ‘Auf(ra) freed 30,000.[ii]
Why not emancipation for all, as a single commandment?
At this point, some critics ask why Islam did not give a single commandment to end slavery? Why was it not done with a single stroke of the pen?
The answer to this question is that Islam did not come to make an empty show of greatness by doing something like this. Instead, its objective was to slowly and gradually reform and improve the society at large. It was neither feasible, nor wise, to suddenly abolish the institution of slavery which had become interwoven into the very texture of society since pre-Islamic times.
The slaves were dependent upon their masters for food, clothing, and shelter, and a sudden abolishment would have caused a large number of people to lose a source of income and livelihood, without there being any social safety-net in place to prevent the potential crisis which such a measure would have plunged the society into. A portion of them would then have turned to illegal ways of earning a living, and the society as a whole would have taken a moral downturn. Therefore, although Islam sought to abolish all slavery, it proceeded to do it gradually and effectively.
Steps to Emancipation
With this gradual reformation in mind, Islamic teachings followed two steps. First, a teaching was given that put an end to forcing a free person into slavery. Second, it was taught that slaves who already existed should be treated kindly and with love so that they start to live independent lives and are gradually prepared for freedom.
The first teaching is expressed very strongly in the following narration:
Prophet Muhammad(sa) said, “Allah says, ‘I will be displeased with three persons on the Day of Resurrection: (1) One who makes a covenant in My Name, but does not fulfill it; (2) One who sells a free person (as a slave) and personally usurps the sale-proceeds; (3) and one who employs a laborer and gets the full work done by him but does not pay him his wages”.[iii]
The second teaching was followed in two ways. Either the Muslims set free the slaves in their possession as a virtuous act in accordance with Islamic teachings, or the slaves were given the option of earning their freedom through a system called mukaatabat [i.e. an agreement between a slave and his master, where the slave offers to pay his own monetary value in order to be set free, by working the number of hours required to pay the settled amount].
Through this system, the master was obliged to set a slave free if he made himself qualified for emancipation. This is something to be judged by the court or the government. The Holy Quran says:
And such as desire a deed of manumission in writing from among those whom your right hands possess, write it for them if you know any good in them; and give them out of the wealth of Allah which He has bestowed upon you. [24:34]
Here, the Holy Quran is very clear in its teaching that if a slave desires to have freedom by payment of an amount, the master is obliged to fulfill the slave’s wish and to set him free provisionally, so that the slave has an opportunity to earn the amount fixed for his release. On top of this, the master is told that he should return some of this money back to the freed slave. This is a system of mukaatabat through which Islam ensures that slavery comes to an end eventually.
Prisoners or Slaves?
A common issue that causes confusion in relation to this topic is that of semantics. Prisoners of war are sometimes conflated with slaves, even though they are completely different. It is true that prisoners of war tended to be called “slaves” and this may have been due to the fact that they were obliged to lived with Muslim families without liberty. However, clear injunctions in the Holy Quran show that prisoners of war are very different from slaves. For instance, the Holy Quran states prisoners of war can only be obtained from among the enemy during a time of a pitched battle:
It does not behove a Prophet that he should have captives until he engages in regular fighting in the land. You desire the goods of the world, while Allah desires for you the Hereafter. And Allah is Mighty, Wise. [8:68]
Then, the Holy Quran says that after the war is over, the prisoners should not be kept:
…[after the battle] either release them as a favour or by taking ransom — until the war lays down its burdens. [47:5]
This means that prisoners are to be released in good will after the battle or by taking ransom in some way (such as money from the family, exchange of prisoners, or some other such means). Further, the Holy Quran states that prisoners are only to be treated strictly to the extent that the enemy is strict to Muslim prisoners:
And if you desire to punish the oppressors, then punish them to the extent to which you have been wronged; but if you show patience, then, surely, that is best for those who are patient. [16:127]
Even here the Muslims are told to restrain themselves and to exercise patience. In brief, regarding prisoners of war, the Quranic teaching is as follows:
The term of imprisonment should terminate with the termination of fighting
No prisoner is to be put to death
No prisoner should be called upon to do anything which is beyond his abilities
The comfort of the prisoner should not be neglected
As a result, it is clear that there is no trace of slavery in Islamic teachings regarding prisoners of war. If terrorist organizations have made slaves out of prisoners of war, or kidnapped people who are free and not even engaged in battle, they have clearly acted against these teachings.
Distribution of Prisoners of War (POWs)
It is true that during the time of the Prophet Muhammad(sa), prisoners of war were distributed and assigned to individuals. Such distribution is one of the reasons why prisoners of war are sometimes confused with slaves.
First, it must be noted that the entire practice of assigning POWs to families or individuals was a retributory measure. Since the enemies of Islam were enslaving Muslims captured in battle, the Muslims assigned POWs to families, as a form of retaliation. Regardless, as shown above, even such assignments did not mean that they were pushed into slavery. The rules were clear in that they were to be treated with kindness and compassion, and to be set free after the war ends. It was in fact such kind treatment meted out to POWs that they started to convert to Islam during the time of Prophet Muhammad(sa).
One logistical reason why POWs were distributed in this manner is that state prisons did not exist at that time. It was a common practice to distribute them in such a way, and Muslims followed the same practice. Over time, this system has become obsolete, and has been replaced by prisons.
The Promised Messiah, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad(as), writes:
It is a matter of great joy that in our era, those people who are referred to as disbelievers in opposition to Islam, have abandoned this practice of injustice and oppression. For this reason, it is now impermissible for Muslims as well to take their prisoners as bond-women and slaves, because God states in the Holy Quran that you may retaliate against a combatant group to a degree, only when they have first taken the lead. Hence, when now such a time no longer exists and the disbelieving people do not act so violently and unjustly towards the Muslims in a state of war, whereby they themselves as well as their men and women are taken as bond-women and slaves; rather, they are considered to be state prisoners, for this reason, in this era, it is now impermissible and unlawful for Muslims as well to do so. [iv]
https://answeringislam.org/Silas/femalecaptives.htm
Female Prisoners of War
The most contentious issue in the course of this discussion is that of female prisoners of war. Such prisoners are seen as “slave wives” or an excuse for institutional rape. The truth is that the word “slave”—as understood by most people today—cannot be applied to POWs, as this article has adequately shown. Distribution of female prisoners of war to individuals—similar to male prisoners of war—was due to the circumstances and needs of the time, in light of the absence of state prisons. As state prisons now exist in almost every country, there is no longer a need to distribute male/female prisoners of war among individuals.
Regardless, even when this was allowed, Islamic teachings followed the dictates of justice and compassion, and never created the conditions for oppression or cruelty. Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-din Mahmud Ahmad, the second Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has commented on this issue at length in his commentary of the Holy Quran, known as Tafsīr-e-Kabīr.
In the discussion of 23:7, he lists the following conditions that had to be met before a female prisoner could be handed over to a Muslim soldier (a summary of these points can be seen in the Detailed Commentary of the Holy Quran, and an explanatory list can be found in the book, Life and Character of the Seal of Prophets – Volume II, pages 220-225):
Prisoners can only be obtained during times of war
They should be released through ransom
If the prisoner cannot afford to pay the ransom, or his/her people or his/her home country is unable to pay the ransom, then the Muslim government should release him/her as a gesture of good will
If the government has reasons to not do that, then Zakāt funds should be used for the release
If that is also not possible, then the prisoner should be given the option of mukaatabat
If the female prisoner chooses not to use option 5, it clearly means that something is preventing her from going back to her home country as she has clearly refrained from exercising her right to earn her release. In such a case, her Muslim master was allowed to marry her involuntarily as a last resort. After that, if the female prisoner gives birth to a child, she automatically becomes a free woman.[v]
Does Islam allow rape with slaves?
Despite all the logic and care for justice in the teachings of Islam as shown above, some critics still make objections. At this stage, they ask why Islam has allowed “rape” with such slave-wives?
As shown in this article, there is no such thing as “slavery” for such women, as far as the common understanding of the term “slavery” is concerned. However, there is no doubt that such women who skip all the aforementioned steps to take their freedom will be obliged to get married to Muslim soldiers.
It should be remembered that war-time commandments in the Holy Quran are meant to combat the immorality that spreads during the chaos of war. Whenever wars take place, rape of innocent women becomes rampant. In fact, rape is considered “an unfortunate but inevitable accompaniment of war”.
Islamic teachings combat such evil systematically by giving two important instructions:
Women who are not participating in battle cannot be captured. Only those women (or men) who are actively participating in the battle can be captured and made POWs. [8:68]
Women who are made POWs have five different avenues to work for their release [Detailed Commentary of the Holy Quran]. - https://www.alislam.org/quran/view/?page=2188®ion=E54
It is only in those cases where the female prisoners of war did not make use of the five avenues available to them, Islam obliged them to get married as a last resort, in the interest of preventing immorality from spreading. As noted earlier, state prisons did not exist in the past and such women could not be held as prisoners in any one facility, and had to be assigned to soldiers or families. Hence, it is these women who are referred as those “whom the right hands possess”.
Considering these beautiful teachings of Islam, it would take a very mischievous critic of Islam to term such a union as rape. Instead, critics of Islam should appreciate the lengths to which Islam has gone even to protect female enemy combatants from being treated with barbarity. Had they been left alone, they would be exposed to numerous dangers and may even become the cause of the spread of immorality in the army and the society at large.
Rape as a weapon of war
The rape of women by soldiers during wartime has occurred throughout history. Indeed, rape was long considered an unfortunate but inevitable accompaniment of war—the result of the prolonged sexual deprivation of troops and insufficient military discipline. Its use as a weapon of war was gruesomely demonstrated during World War II, when both Allied and Axis armies committed rape as a means of terrorizing enemy civilian populations and demoralizing enemy troops. Two of the worst examples were the sexual enslavement of women in territories conquered by the Japanese army and the mass rape committed against German women by advancing Russian soldiers.
In the second half of the 20th century, cases of rape were documented in more than 20 military and paramilitary conflicts. In the 1990s, rape was used as an instrument of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia and as a means of genocide in Rwanda. In the former case, women belonging to subjugated ethnic groups were intentionally impregnated through rape by enemy soldiers; in the latter case, women belonging to the Tutsi ethnic group were systematically raped by HIV-infected men recruited and organized by the Hutu-led government.
In the late 20th century, in part because of the prevalence of rape in the Balkan and Rwandan conflicts, the international community began to recognize rape as a weapon and strategy of war, and efforts were made to prosecute such acts under existing international law. The primary statute, Article 27 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (1949), already included language protecting women “against any attack on their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault”; this protection was extended in an additional protocol adopted in 1977.
In 1993 the United Nations (UN) Commission on Human Rights (replaced in 2006 by the UN Human Rights Council) declared systematic rape and military sexual slavery to be crimes against humanity punishable as violations of women’s human rights. In 1995 the UN’s Fourth World Conference on Women specified that rape by armed groups during wartime is a war crime. The jurisdiction of the international tribunals established to prosecute crimes committed in the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda both included rape, making these tribunals among the first international bodies to prosecute sexual violence as a war crime. In a landmark case in 1998, the Rwandan tribunal ruled that “rape and sexual violence constitute genocide.” The International Criminal Court, established in 1998, subsequently was granted jurisdiction over a range of women’s issues, including rape and forced pregnancy. In a resolution adopted in 2008 the UN Security Council affirmed that “rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity or a constitutive act with respect to genocide.”
In 2008 the government of Congo (Kinshasa) and various international organizations increased efforts to combat the country’s rape crisis—the continuing use of rape on a massive scale by all sides in the brutal civil war that had begun in 1998. Instruction in forensic techniques and construction of courthouses, legal clinics, and prisons subsequently yielded a substantial increase in arrests, prosecutions, and convictions in Congo. The crisis and its victims—by then more than a quarter of a million women and girls, by some estimates—were documented in the 2008 film The Greatest Silence by filmmaker Lisa Jackson.
In 2009 UN officials and several human rights and aid organizations, including Human Rights Watch and Oxfam, reported a large number of rapes of males in eastern Congo. The attacks, estimated in the hundreds, were believed to be in retaliation for joint military operations between Congo and its former rival Rwanda.
Why does the Quran say that infidels should be killed?
The verse of the Holy Quran is often mentioned to malign Islam. The verse does not say infidels it says idolaters. (9:5) And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.
This verse, chapter 9 verse 5, is often used as evidence that Islam allows killing of non-Muslims, but what is not recognized is the context and history behind these verses. The history of this verse is that when Prophet Muhammad(sa) began preaching the unity of God he was persecuted for 13 years, much as Prophets Abraham and Jesus were. Since Muslims who are being persecuted are encouraged to leave for safer areas, rather than create disorder, Muhammad(sa) and his followers migrated to Medina. After they left, the Meccans attacked them in Medina on and off for a period of nine years until Chapter 9 was revealed.
Looking at the context of the verses, it becomes obvious that the commandment of this verse only relates to those tribes who continued hostilities against the Muslims even after they had migrated. In particular, reference is made to 5 tribes (‘Banu Khuza’ah, Banu Mudlij, Banu Bakr, Banu Damrah, and Banu Sulaiim) that did not honor the treaties they made with Muslims. It is also important to remember that the preceding verses give these people respite for 4 months to reconsider their behavior and cease hostilities. Sadly after 4 months passed, the enemies of Islam continued their hostilities against the Muslims. Only then was Prophet Muhammad(sa) commanded by God to meet them in battle to defend Muslims and the religion of Islam.
Even in this situation the Quran states that if the enemies repent of their behavior and promise to fulfill their treaties, it becomes incumbent on Muslims to cease military action and forgive them. Unfortunately those who take this specific verse out of context fail to see that as the title Al-Taubah suggests, the main subject matter of the chapter is forgiveness and repentance.
Custodianship of the Right Hand: Concubinage, Rape, and ‘Sexual Slavery’ in Islam In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful The issues of slavery, concubinage, and the rape of women in warfare throughout history are subject to fierce intellectual, philosophical, and psychological discussion. They are issues that have led to painful doubts within many faith communities, including the Muslim community. This paper addresses the allegations that the early Muslims permitted and encouraged the rape of women in warfare and their exploitation as ‘sex slaves.’ These claims are based upon citing a set of historical facts and Islamic texts out of context, sometimes in the service of hardline anti-immigration politics intended to demonize and dehumanize Muslim immigrants on the whole as sexual predators. The legal status of sexual relationships within the historical institution of slavery (or more accurately in Islamic terms, the “custodianship of the right hand”) is explained in detail, and the firm prohibition of rape and sexual harm in early Islam is documented. It is also demonstrated that Islam, having inherited an historical system of economic slavery in Arabia, proceeded to humanize slaves and grant them rights and inherent dignity, with several indications in the law that logically resulted in universal emancipation. Finally, it will be proven that sexual consent, while difficult to define in law even today, was certainly a moral requirement as understood by the early Muslims and later scholars, including consent within the concubine relationship.
Beheading in France and the rise of radical Islam in Europe It is a paradox as to how a person can loathe and hate the same society which he or she desires to be part of. Europe is battling with this paradox where the first and second generation immigrants from Muslim countries have led to rise in Islamic terrorism.
-
3:10
What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?
5 days agoHow The Left Are Trying To Destroy Americans’ Dismal Views Nation’s Politics Today
3.06K6 -
LIVE
In The Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd
23 hours agoNo RINOs, Neocons, or Warhawks! | In the Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd – Ep. 688 – 11/11/2024
6,955 watching -
1:53:43
The Quartering
4 hours agoKamala's Desperate Attempt To Stop Trump & Installed As President! House Race Update New Border Czar
44.2K5 -
1:27:19
Russell Brand
4 hours agoKamala Goes BANKRUPT & WARS w/Biden + President Trump Announces Plan To RECLAIM Free Speech - SF490
150K133 -
11:32
Silver Dragons
2 hours agoIs This GAME OVER for SILVER?
108 -
9:04
Gun Owners Of America
1 day agoTrump Promises To "Rip Up" ATF Rules
8309 -
1:49:13
vivafrei
5 hours agoThe Absolute State of Canada - Artur Pawlowski Interview AND MORE CANADIAN MADNESS! Viva Frei
56.5K3 -
1:57:57
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoFulfill The Mandate | Paoletta, Schilling, Schlicther | 11.11.24
139K60 -
1:23:15
The New American
2 hours agoTrump to End Censorship | The New American Daily
2.82K -
1:09:22
The Kevin Trudeau Show
5 hours agoThe Kevin Trudeau Show | Ep. 64 | LIVE at 1 PM CT
11.3K1