Israeli Massacre ENDS Second Amendment Debate FOREVER!

1 year ago
1.96K

Watching hundreds of Israeli citizens being massacred, raped, and kidnapped by violent Hamas invaders has been utterly horrific.

Sadly, these atrocities were made all the easier because Israel generally prohibits the private possession of arms for purposes of self-defense. There is no "Israeli version" of America's Second Amendment.

How differently would the last days have been if the victims of Hamas had been armed only as well as a typical American home, where the AR-pattern rifle is perhaps the most commonly owned long gun in the country? Then, at least the massacre would have come at an instant and substantial cost to the attackers.

Today's show will be very brief, but very important--and it's really just a reading of a tweet from our friend of the Law of Self Defense community, Second Amendment Attorney Kosta Moros. Kosta has been a guest on show before, and surely will be again, and I've always found him to be exceptionally thoughtful on the law generally and the Second Amendment in particular.

Incidentally, you can follow Kosta on Twitter here, and I urge that you do: @MorosKostas

THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE INSURANCE PROVIDE I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust

Disclaimer - video is for educational purpose only.Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Loading 2 comments...