Vaxx adverse effect reporting was actively suppressed - Nurse Gail Macrae

Nurse Gail Macrae shares that she had strong evidence that the COVID jabs were causing significant medical harm. At least according to the book, medical practitioners are obligated to report possible vaccine adverse events to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).

However, every time she brought up reporting these adverse effects, she was pressured by both doctors and administrative staff to REFRAIN FROM reporting with the argument is that they didn't have airtight proof that the adverse events were caused by the jab. However, the rule is that POTENTIAL adverse effect should be reported. The CDC should then determine if it is merely correlation or possible/likely causation.

NB: The Bradford Hill criteria are a very helpful tool in this case IF those involved are primarily interested in uncovering the Truth. In reality, they always seem to be interested in suppressing inconvenient Truths.

A colleague of Gail’s who manned the injection clinic was told by her direct manager that if she reported even a single adverse event of the COVID shots, she would be fired.

There are strong disincentives to speaking up about vaxx adverse effects. People are afraid of losing their jobs, afraid of their reputation getting smashed, afraid of being called a conspiracy theorist and misinformation spreader.

As a result, most stay quiet, and their silence should not be interpreted as a sign that everything is hunky-dory. In this case, absence of reported adverse effects is definitely NOT proof that these adverse effects are rare.

Only the strong and courageous people with integrity speak up.

Some narrative-followers claim that Gail has some kind of hero complex, but that doesn’t make any sense. Because she spoke up about things that people don’t want to hear about, she was fired from her job, taken out of her graduate program to become a primary care provider after she had already finished her degree except for 700 clinical hours, ostracized, and labeled a conspiracy theorist.

The most important initial rule of thumb to determine if people are telling the unbiased truth, is to look at their INCENTIVES: If they stand to win everything and lose nothing by telling you this, be extremely skeptical. On the other hand, if they stand to lose everything and win nothing by telling you this, give them the strong benefit of the doubt.

Why did Gail have the courage and strength to speak up when others didn’t?

1. She spent time working in Africa where she learned what to be afraid of and what not to be afraid of. When ‘COVID’ hit, she recognized it as a severe flu, i.e. nothing to be deathly afraid about. This kept her brain functioning while other people’s brains went into flight-or-flight mode.
2. She had been homeschooled in high school, which taught her to base her self-worth on herself and not on the people that she was surrounded by. Gail’s colleagues behaved like they were back in high school: they did everything possible to fit in.
3. She realized that to continue with the hospital COVID protocols and/or to keep quiet about the toxic jabs, made her complicit in murder. She refused to do that.

SOURCE

Segment from:
https://rumble.com/v36uula