UNSUSTAINABLE - The UN's Agenda for World Domination (2020) | Full Documentary

Globalists in the Power Elite, working through the United Nations, are waging war against property rights, gun rights and capitalism in order to usher in a Marxist World Order. This war is known as "Agenda 21".
---
Considered a "conspiracy theory" by the Mainstream Media and other apologists of globalization, the flagship term for Agenda 21 - "sustainable development" - crops up in thousands of federal, state and local government laws, regulations, policies and documents. So is Agenda 21 really just a "theory"?
---
The UN says "sustainable development" is simply the "Environmental Movement" reconfiguring the planet into a safe, green world. Others maintain it's the forced inventory and control of all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, building projects and human beings on the planet. In other words, a blueprint for what many fear could morph into a totalitarian World Government. So what's the real agenda behind Agenda 21?
---
A James Jaeger film:
http://www.mecfilms.com/unsustainable.html
---
Support this documentary:
http://www.UNsustainable.us/donate
---
FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES
---
Mirrored From:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/carter-heavy-industries/
---
24.106 Aufrufe 09.06.2020
a James Jaeger Film
SYNOPSIS:
---
Globalists in the Power Elite — working through the United Nations — are waging war against property rights, gun rights and capitalism in order to usher in a Marxist World Order. This war is known as “Agenda 21.”
---
Considered a “conspiracy theory” by the Mainstream Media and other apologists of globalization, the flagship term for Agenda 21 — “sustainable development” — crops up in thousands of federal, state and local government laws, regulations, policies and documents. So is Agenda 21 really just a “theory”?
---
The UN says “sustainable development” is simply the “Environmental Movement” reconfiguring the planet into a safe, green world. Others maintain it’s the forced inventory and control of all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, building projects and human beings on the planet. In other words, a blueprint for what many fear could morph into a totalitarian World Government. So what’s the real agenda behind Agenda 21?
---
“Let’s start with the UN’s declaration of human rights and see how it compares with the US Bill of Rights in our Constitution our Bill of Rights our Declaration of Independence we are very much told by the founding fathers that our rights come from God, that they are inalienable rights given to us by our Creator the UN Declaration of Rights has no mention of God, no mention of a higher authority, the UN sees itself as the higher Authority. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, not necessarily based on human rights, but it’s based on natural law. Surely if the UN is calling for its 193 governments to partner they will be partnering behind worthwhile principles, principles similar to the principles in the US Constitution, a document that facilitated the creation of the freest and wealthiest nation that has ever existed. A nation that millions of people migrate to in order to escape their UN member nations, the Bill of Rights is a set of absolutes, here they are, you can’t do this this this this and this and there’s no exception clause, whereas the Declaration of Human Rights in the UN system specifically says, well, these rights can be exercised as long as they don’t conflict with the purposes and goals of the United Nations, well, who determines that, well, the political people that are operating the United Nations.
---
We see that the following words are prominent in the US Bill of Rights: petition, probable cause, trial by jury, due process, unreasonable searches, excessive bail, Free State, but when we search for these words in the UN’s declaration, none of them are present. These are among the backbone of constitutional government and personal liberty. If you eliminate those, you basically have eliminated the essence of American Liberty.
---
Government is not seen in the American tradition as the grantor of Rights, but rather as the protector of Rights, if you were to take the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments of the Constitution and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights you will see two vastly different documents, one of them protects rights that are ours god-given, the other one gives rights and then qualifies those rights out of existence.
---
I don’t know about you, but this is a little creepy a bill of rights for a 193 government partnership that has no mention of the right to petition, no mention of probable cause, no mention of trial by jury, no mention of due process and no mention of freedom from unreasonable searches.
---
The UN declaration sounds like a recipe for a police state, but even scarier, it sounds like a recipe for a really big police state. “Jails. prisons. fines. death penalties if necessary, a police state is where its primary characteristic is that the police are at your doorstep the police are telling you what to do or at least they’re to make sure they’re to make sure you do it after the politicians tell you what to do, so a police state is a totalitarian state, what we need to do is get rid of the police component of the state, let’s make the state something to protect us, not to police us. (Edward G. Griffin)” Out of the 195 countries in the world, the UN has 193 governments of these countries signed up to forward their non-binding agenda, that’s a lot of governments and none of them or their people are being advised to have a bill of rights that says anything about petition, probable cause, trial by jury, due process, unreasonable searches, excessive bail or free states..and you can read through most of each of these documents but they also say then but we can pass a law to suspend it you can’t suspend a bill of rights, anything in the Bill of Rights in the United States. If this is the UN’s view of human rights it sounds like their agenda is not only a plan for a police state, but a global police state.

“A globalist totalitarian society would look something like Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany on steroids and it would be comprised of a large population of order followers that would be willing to carry out the commands of oligarchical Elitists at the top of the food chain of power. (Mark Passio)” The worst thing is nowhere in the UN’s declaration is the right to keep and bear arms or the right to own real estate, what the founders called private property, these omissions guarantee what we’re looking at could really be nasty, especially if the wrong people got in there to rule.”
---
“It’s not about the abundance that we have here on planet earth, it’s about creating scarcity using fear-mongering tactics, one is..man-made anthropogenic global warming or that farmers and ranchers are using 70% of the world’s water for agriculture, these things are not true..”

===========

“Let’s start with the UN’s declaration of human rights and see how it compares with the US Bill of Rights in our Constitution our Bill of Rights our Declaration of Independence we are very much told by the founding fathers that our rights come from God, that they are inalienable rights given to us by our Creator the UN Declaration of Rights has no mention of God, no mention of a higher authority, the UN sees itself as the higher Authority. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, not necessarily based on human rights, but it’s based on natural law. Surely if the UN is calling for its 193 governments to partner they will be partnering behind worthwhile principles, principles similar to the principles in the US Constitution, a document that facilitated the creation of the freest and wealthiest nation that has ever existed.

A nation that millions of people migrate to in order to escape their UN member nations, the Bill of Rights is a set of absolutes, here they are, you can’t do this this this this and this and there’s no exception clause, whereas the Declaration of Human Rights in the UN system specifically says, well, these rights can be exercised as long as they don’t conflict with the purposes and goals of the United Nations, well, who determines that, well, the political people that are operating the United Nations. We see that the following words are prominent in the US Bill of Rights: petition, probable cause, trial by jury, due process, unreasonable searches, excessive bail, Free State, but when we search for these words in the UN’s declaration, none of them are present. These are among the backbone of constitutional government and personal liberty. If you eliminate those, you basically have eliminated the essence of American Liberty. Government is not seen in the American tradition as the grantor of Rights, but rather as the protector of Rights, if you were to take the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments of the Constitution and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights you will see two vastly different documents, one of them protects rights that are ours god-given, the other one gives rights and then qualifies those rights out of existence. I don’t know about you, but this is a little creepy a bill of rights for a 193 government partnership that has no mention of the right to petition, no mention of probable cause, no mention of trial by jury, no mention of due process and no mention of freedom from unreasonable searches. The UN declaration sounds like a recipe for a police state, but even scarier, it sounds like a recipe for a really big police state. “Jails. prisons. fines. death penalties if necessary, a police state is where its primary characteristic is that the police are at your doorstep the police are telling you what to do or at least they’re to make sure they’re to make sure you do it after the politicians tell you what to do, so a police state is a totalitarian state, what we need to do is get rid of the police component of the state, let’s make the state something to protect us, not to police us. (Edward G. Griffin)”

Out of the 195 countries in the world, the UN has 193 governments of these countries signed up to forward their non-binding agenda, that’s a lot of governments and none of them or their people are being advised to have a bill of rights that says anything about petition, probable cause, trial by jury, due process, unreasonable searches, excessive bail or free states..and you can read through most of each of these documents but they also say then but we can pass a law to suspend it you can’t suspend a bill of rights, anything in the Bill of Rights in the United States. If this is the UN’s view of human rights it sounds like their agenda is not only a plan for a police state, but a global police state. “A globalist totalitarian society would look something like Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany on steroids and it would be comprised of a large population of order followers that would be willing to carry out the commands of oligarchical Elitists at the top of the food chain of power. (Mark Passio)”

The worst thing is nowhere in the UN’s declaration is the right to keep and bear arms or the right to own real estate, what the founders called private property, these omissions guarantee what we’re looking at could really be nasty, especially if the wrong people got in there to rule.”

“It’s not about the abundance that we have here on planet earth, it’s about creating scarcity using fear-mongering tactics, one is..man-made anthropogenic global warming or that farmers and ranchers are using 70% of the world’s water for agriculture, these things are not true..”
https://conspiracyrevelation.com/2023/06/12/unsustainable-the-uns-agenda-for-world-domination-full-movie/