The Secret Power of Juries
A Secret Part of Our Legal Tradition:
Humanism, Social Justice, and the Power of Juries
Featuring Gary Bauslaugh, Author
Canadians know that the jurors at a trial decide the defendant's guilt or innocence according to the law of the land. What they don't know is how far that right actually goes, and what the real power of juries is.
Sometimes people -- even jurors -- wonder if a law or a judgment in a particular case is a just one. When the law seems wrong, we are told there is only one solution: change the law.
In fact, though, in our legal system there is another remedy: When jurors decide that to question the fairness of applying the law in the case they are deciding may lead to a manifestly unfair and unjust result, they have the right not to apply that law. However, in Canada it is illegal and completely forbidden for a trial lawyer, or even a judge to tell jurors they have this right to nullify the law.
In the Canadian justice system, jurors can hand down a verdict of not guilty even if the facts pointing to guilt are clear, even if the accused doesn't deny the facts, even if the judge tells the jurors to find the accused guilty. This centuries-old safeguard, which goes along with the principle of jury independence, has protected people's rights and freedoms and helped sweep away laws that ordinary citizens think are outdated and unjust.
This power of juries is known to the legal community -- but is largely unknown by the general public -- until now. Gary Bauslaugh, author of Robert Latimer, A Story of Justice and Mercy (Lorimer, 2010), learned the specifics of this matter as a result of his research around the Robert Latimer case. In his new book, written for non-expert readers and citizens who have been summoned for jury duty, he tells the story of jury nullification from Quaker leader William Penn to the modern-day acquittal of Henry Morgentaler, who was charged with conducting abortions. Bauslaugh then lays out the arguments that some people make against jury independence and nullification, and makes his own argument in favour of these safeguards. He offers suggestions for jurors who may find themselves in a situation where their consciences are at odds with the law.
-
1:59:59
Slavica Vukmanovic
1 year agoCovid Was An Act Of War Against The Human Race Says Dr. David E. Martin
4021 -
18:52
Bright Insight
11 hours agoThe Great Pyramid HIDDEN Chamber is Now a Conspiracy
111K135 -
1:11:58
The Kirk Minihane Show
12 hours agoThe 420 Show- September 28 , 2024
58.1K6 -
4:11
Nitrocross
1 day agoThe Edge with Tanner Foust | Episode 1
80.7K9 -
40:33
Alexis Wilkins
1 day agoBetween the Headlines with Alexis Wilkins: Eric Adams, Tariffs, Nathan Wade MISSING & more
56.8K11 -
1:16:08
Steve-O's Wild Ride! Podcast
2 days ago $2.11 earnedBrandon Novak and Steve-O Avoid Discussion Of Sobriety - Wildride #234
60.8K18 -
4:15:30
GamerGril
16 hours agoWHORDE MASTER RETURNS | DAYS GONE
51.8K11 -
LIVE
Right Side Broadcasting Network
3 days agoLIVE REPLAY: President Trump Delivers Remarks in Prairie du Chien, WI - 9/28/24
4,304 watching -
2:59:48
Jewels Jones Live ®
1 day ago“TARGETING TRUMP’S LIFE” | A Political Rendezvous - Ep. 93
120K53 -
21:20
MYLUNCHBREAK CHANNEL PAGE
19 hours agoThe Palace in Dallas?
108K60