NY WEATHER-Evening Sky IYKYN 08/11/2023 #lookup #chemtrails

NY WEATHER 2023 @magnumusack
Take Notice: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging freedom of speech; or of the press….” Note: The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

See, Kelley v. Post Publishing Company, 327 Mass. 275 (1951) “The law does not provide a remedy for every annoyance that occurs in everyday life. Many things which are distressing or may be lacking in propriety or good taste are not actionable.” Id., at 278.

Mobile signage lacks Obscenity that fails essential elements of Miller Test supra, Miller v. California, 413 U.S. (1973). Signage not Inciting Violence nor Fighting Words failing Brandenburg Test supra, Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. (1969).

See, Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011) "Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them into tears of both joy and sorrow….” Id., at IV, para 3. Court ruled in favor of Phelps derogatory expressions via displayed signage and spoken words, which negates so-called hate speech.

See, Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949) "…a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute." Id., at 337 p. 4, para 3. Note: includes signage.

See, USC Chapter 21, Title 42, §1983 & 1985, actions upon political subdivisions aka, municipal corporations and police, also complicit and contriving actors in their private capacity, further see, Title 18, §241 & 242.

See, Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) in making an officer of the state a party defendant in a law suit, ensuing civil undertaking arising from deprivation of civil rights under color of law, collaterally attacking public officers bonds, and or personal assets i.e., pensions and real estate in retribution for waging mixed war.

God Bless our Bill of Rights.