WHOOPI makes the case for CLARENCE THOMAS....REDPILL #theview #truth #supremecourt #clarencethomas

Welcome back to our channel, where today we're breaking down the latest comments made by Whoopi Goldberg on affirmative action and Justice Clarence Thomas. It's clear that there's some misunderstanding about this historical, yet controversial policy. Buckle up as we dive deep into what it all means for our country's evolution.

Whoopi Goldberg, a well-known figure, attempted to dissect a complex issue regarding affirmative action. While her words might seem fresh and unique, a careful examination reveals a misunderstanding of the subject. We've often discussed how a Supreme Court precedent, regardless of its longevity, is not an unchangeable law. The Constitution remains the ultimate legal authority, not societal norms or ideologies.

This latest verdict from the Supreme Court is an excellent example of this principle in action. The justices asked a simple question: Does the Constitution mandate or even allow race-based quotas? If we look purely from a constitutional perspective, the answer is a resounding no.

Whoopi’s argument, like many others, recognizes the unfair past, but its connection to the Constitution is where we diverge. The Constitution should not be altered based on the past; that's for the legislative branch to address.

We understand that racism still exists. It's an unfortunate reality that continues to affect communities globally. Affirmative action, however, is not a cure for racism. It’s a complex problem that requires much more than just policy adjustments.

The interplay between affirmative action, racism, and the Constitution is delicate, and we're here to navigate through it with you. As always, we're keen to hear your thoughts, so be sure to leave a comment below.

Also, let's not forget about the right to bear arms, the right to vote, or abortion rights - all issues tied to our understanding of the Constitution. The document's purpose is not to politicize these issues, but to call balls and strikes.

Before we wrap this up, let's remember that even people we disagree with might have stories worth hearing. Clarence Thomas, for instance, had an incredibly difficult upbringing. His memoir, "My Grandfather's Son," is a testament to this, and it's worth a read.

To sum up, the Constitution is not a tool for politics, and the Supreme Court's role is to ensure this principle is upheld. We, the people, have the power to effect change through our collective actions.

Let's continue this conversation in the comments below. And don't forget to like, subscribe, and share our content. #AffirmativeAction #ClarenceThomas #WhoopiGoldberg #Constitution #SupremeCourt #Racism #Precedents #Law #Justice #Equality #Debate #HistoricalDecisions #Democracy #Politics #UnderstandingLaw