Criminals Running Our Food Chain Supply Organized Food Fraud Crime Documentary

World Wide Criminals Running Our Food Chain Supply Horse Meat And Human Meat Labelled As Beef. Honey diluted with cheap sugar syrups. Counterfeit extra-virgin olive oil. Food crime is a multi-billion dollar industry affecting everything from the cheapest to most expensive ingredient. 10% of what we eat is thought to be adulterated. “What we know for sure is that food fraud is growing exponentially and it’s more and more worrying,” states one consumer advocate.

Show more

Criminal syndicates are infiltrating the global food supply chain, undermining the ability of consumers to trust what is on the label and what ends up on their plate. In Italy, entire sectors of the food industry are controlled by the mafia. All over the world, well-organized criminal networks work together to penetrate complex supply chains. Scams range from the intentional mislabeling of inferior products in order to pass them off as premium items, to the substitution of one food stuff for something else entirely. The profits are enormous. But what are the risks to the consumer? How can we identify food fraud? And what can be done to stop it?

In this investigation, we follow the food fraud brigades and reveal how little we know about what we’re eating. From the olive groves of Italy to the fish markets of France and the abattoirs of Poland, this film takes you on a culinary journey of a very different kind. A global investigation into the counterfeit food industry.

Food Identification and Organized Crime
Food fraud is big business. Some estimates put the economic cost of food fraud as high as US$40 billion, an order of magnitude greater than the entire global herb and spice trade in 2017. The sheer scale of global food trade, combined with often opaque supply chains, creates incentives to reduce costs at every step, including by selling inferior products as if they were premium versions. Although many incidents can be traced back to individual unscrupulous operators, food fraud is also a major money-making avenue for organized crime syndicates. Food is much easier to move between jurisdictions than drugs, weapons and other organized-crime mainstays, and food fraud carries much smaller legal penalties. For these reasons, it’s becoming a larger part of the syndicates’ strategies. Fighting food fraud is crucial to help end the violence that these organizations inflict.

Perhaps the most famous incidence of food fraud by an organized crime syndicate is the production of fraudulent olive oil by an Italian criminal organization. Olive oil can be extracted from olives in a variety of ways, but extra virgin olive oil must be produced by purely mechanical processes with no solvents or similar aids. Extra virgin olive oil has a distinctive color, chemistry and flavor profile that has been highly regarded around the world for thousands of years. The Italian and other organized crime syndicates use solvents to extract inferior grades of olive oil from the waste produced by legitimate extra-virgin processing facilities, which they then present as the coveted extra virgin. Outside of olive-growing countries in the Mediterranean, familiarity with true extra virgin olive oil is often limited, making it easy for unaware consumers to accept inferior products. Crime syndicates usually undercut the prices of their legitimate competitors, shutting them out of all but boutique status. And in places such as the United States, terms such as “extra virgin” are not regulated the way that they are in Europe, limiting the ability of external authorities to intervene. Thanks to this persistent and intentional mislabeling, extra-virgin olive oil represents about 10% of all olive oil produced worldwide but up to 50% of the olive oil on store shelves, and the proceeds fund the other activities of organized crime.

Food fraud is so widespread that the international-policing organizations Interpol and Europol conduct joint operations to combat it and prosecute those who engage in it. A recent joint operation, Opson V, confiscated over 10,000 metric tons and 100 million liters of adulterated, often hazardous food. Their worldwide finds included olives and spices painted with dangerous dyes to mask their low quality, sugar mixed with fertilizer, and plots to sell inferior alcohol using stolen premium labels. Other common food-adulteration methods include mixing saffron with bits of red silk or non-flavored flower parts, blending turmeric with other related roots, and reducing the expense of nutmeg by adding coffee husks.

Detecting food adulteration is not simply a matter of making sure people get their money’s worth at the grocery store or restaurant. Some adulteration practices are dangerous or carry allergen risks. In 2012, the United States and Canada imposed widespread product recalls in response to cumin adulterated with peanuts, including thousands of products made commercially with contaminated cumin, after dozens of people suffered severe reactions due to the undisclosed allergen. The toxic dye Sudan 1 was discovered as a color enhancer in chili powder sold in the EU in 2005, leading to investigations and new laws regarding food additives. The British Food Standards Agency observed an increase from 49 reported adulteration incidents in the UK in 2007 to 1,538 in 2013, and the problem shows no signs of slowing down.

Detecting adulterated and fraudulent food is a challenge due to the range of methods available for presenting food as something it is not. Biological substitutions are often observable through genetic testing, and Thermo Fisher Scientific offers a broad suite of DNA-based tests for food authenticity, including the Thermo Scientific Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Food Authenticity Workflow for identifying the species present in a food sample and detecting specific, common adulterants. Other tools can target products and contaminants that contain little or no DNA, including oils and minerals. Infrared spectroscopy and mass spectrometry are the premier tools for recognizing and identifying contaminants in food and can even offer insight into the origins of particular batches via isotopic analysis. With these advanced biological techniques, food suppliers can protect their supply chains from unscrupulous vendors and consumers can rest easy that their extra virgin olive oil is genuine.

Combat food fraud with a complete next generation sequencing workflow for in-house multi-species ID
Having confidence in the authenticity of your food ingredients is essential to protect your brand against food fraud: a topic of increasing concern in the food industry and an area highly regulated by authorities through food labelling regulations. Food fraud costs the food industry around $15 billion globally1, 2 however the complexity of the food supply chain is challenging the abilities of analytical tools used for traceability of ingredients. The Thermo Scientific™ Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Food Authenticity Workflow brings the power of NGS technology to your lab making it possible to identify the plant, fish and meat species contained in the most complex food samples. Let us help you to protect your customers and your reputation against intentional, or accidental, adulteration.

Lab-Grown And Real Human Meat Was FDA Approved Cannibalism A Sprit Cooking

https://rumble.com/v2mnkmi-lab-grown-and-real-human-meat-was-fda-approved-cannibalism-a-sprit-cooking.html

There is something deeply disquieting about cannibalism. Motives and technicalities do not matter; eating human flesh is now universally considered revolting, whatever the circumstances. However, if we trust a long line of anthropologists and ethnographers, this has not always been the case in all parts of the world and is therefore not self-evident.

How Americans And World Are Tricked Into Buying Fake Food Learn the Difference ?

https://rumble.com/v2mkfre-how-americans-and-world-are-tricked-into-buying-fake-food-learn-the-differe.html

The food in your kitchen cabinets may not be what it seems. Fraudsters motivated by economic gain secretly infiltrate the global food market through a variety of means, including counterfeits, dilutions, substitution and mislabeling, according to the Global Food Safety Initiative. This may not only harm consumers’ wallets, but it can also put public health and safety at risk. Some estimates say food fraud affects at least 1% of the global food industry at a cost as high as $40 billion a year, according to the FDA.

600 Billion Dollars Poison Ingredient Making Your Food Toxic To Eat Processed Food

https://rumble.com/v2mesq8-600-billion-dollars-poison-ingredient-making-your-food-toxic-to-eat-process.html

Nina deserves a lot more accreditation on this video, she was one of the first people to shed light on the problems with seed oils and the history of how they came to be. Top Ten Toxic Food Ingredients in Processed Food - Any food that has been canned, dehydrated, or had chemicals added to it is a processed food, and these foods make up about 60 percent of the average American diet. - Most of us don't think of the food we eat as poison, but some of the ingredients commonly found in processed foods can be considered toxic. By "toxic," I mean chemicals or highly processed ingredients that aren't good for you or can cause harm to your health. I'm talking about refined grains, trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, and all the other artificial junk you can't even pronounce on the ingredient lists.

What is left out of our food labels? Behind the cow industry are disturbing secrets you are not supposed to know. Supermarket beef has become an industrialized, unnatural product laced with lies beyond the labels. What actually happens to that meat before it reaches grocery store shelves? In this blog I’ll unveil the dirty truth behind the cattle slaughter process everyone needs to hear.

From adulterated olive oil to counterfeit vodka, the trade in fake food is booming – and for mafia gangs it's less risky than drugs. At first glance the sprawling campus in the glorious Cotswolds countryside looks an unlikely base from which to wage war against Italy's most feared crime organization, the 'Ndrangheta.

And yet the laboratories of Campden BRI, once part of the University of Bristol and now a major research hub, are, in their own quiet way, playing a vital role in tackling organized crime. The laboratories are not conducting forensic tests on specks of blood or splinters of bone. Rather, they have been contracted by the government's Rural Payments Agency to carry out chemical tests to establish the purity of olive oil which, since March, has been subject to new EU regulations designed to ensure that consumers get what they believe they are paying for.

This is bad news for the 'Ndrangheta and other organized criminal gangs, which for decades have been assiduously passing off inferior olive oil and oil from other vegetable sources as the premium extra virgin variety.

According to the European parliament's food safety committee, olive oil is the product most at risk of food fraud, and the rewards for adulteration of it are substantial. Cheap pomace olive oil – extracted from olive residue using chemicals – sells for 32.3p per 100ml, compared with £1.50 for extra virgin.

"Olive oil is a valuable commodity and fraud is on the increase," said Dr Julian South, head of chemistry and biochemistry at Campden BRI. "Food authenticity continues to be a high-profile issue, and the testing of olive oils is taking place in all European Union member states."

Jenny Morris, principal policy officer at the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health, acknowledged that olive oil was ripe for fraud. "A lot of people buy virgin olive oil," she said. "They like the fact that it is high quality and they are prepared to pay a premium. If you are a criminal and you get hold of some oil, not necessarily olive oil, you can color it green with a bit of chlorophyll and make a lot of money out of it. Because of its distribution, it is sometimes hard to track."

But many other products are almost as vulnerable to criminal adulteration as olive oil. Other popular and lucrative frauds include diluting honey with cheap sugar syrup, passing off methanol as vodka, mixing inferior rice with premium basmati and switching cheap fish such as catfish with expensive alternatives like haddock. It certainly beats mixing cocaine with bulking agents like talcum powder – an activity that is far riskier than corrupting the food chain, according to experts.

"At the moment the risks for criminals operating in this field are low because they are not routinely coming up against trained and organized professional investigators," Gary Copson, a former Metropolitan police detective and advisor to the government's Elliot review into food chain integrity, told a parliamentary committee earlier this year.

"While there is excellent work being done by trading standards, it is generally focused at a lower level. They don't have the capacity to work at the higher level that we have seen and suspect is in the background," Copson said, according to Environmental Health News.

The Elliot review, due to report by early June, will help to highlight the extent to which organized crime has penetrated food distribution networks. This became apparent during the horsemeat scandal last year and was confirmed in February following the launch of Operation Opson III, an Interpol campaign that seized more than 1,200 tons of fake or sub-standard food and nearly 430,000 liters of counterfeit drinks. Almost 100 people were arrested or detained in 33 countries, while officers impounded more than 131,000 liters of oil and vinegar, 80,000 biscuits and chocolate bars, 20 tons of spices and condiments, 186 tons of cereals, 45 tons of dairy products and 42 liters of honey.

The largest amounts of foodstuffs seized were in the fish or seafood category – including 484 tons of yellowfin tuna. Some of the frauds uncovered in the operation came straight from the pages of bad novels. Investigators discovered an organized crime network in Italy behind the manufacture and distribution of fake champagne. Materials to prepare 60,000 bottles, including fake labels, were seized following raids on two sites, with three people arrested and 24 others reported to the authorities.

In Bangkok, the Royal Thai police raided a warehouse and recovered more than 270 bottles of fake whisky, as well as forged stickers, labels and packaging. Officials in the Philippines seized nearly 150,000 fake stock cubes, while French police identified and shut down an illegal abattoir on the outskirts of Paris. In Spain, 24 people were detained for illegal work and immigration offences after investigators recovered 4.5 tons of snails that had been taken from woods and fields.

In the UK, police seized 17,156 liters of counterfeit vodka, with an estimated street value of £1m, worth around £270,000 to the UK exchequer in duty and VAT.

Michael Ellis, head of Interpol's trafficking in illicit goods and counterfeiting unit, said at the time that the operation would have opened many people's eyes to the threats posed by organized criminal networks. "Most people would be surprised at the everyday foods and drink which are being counterfeited, and the volume of seizures shows that this is a serious global problem," he said.

But counterfeiting is only one weapon in the criminal gangs' armory. In Mexico, a drug cartel known as the Knights Templar has recently been taking over lime farms in an area called the Tierra Caliente. The cartel now controls a large proportion of the limes exported to the US, with the result that prices have tripled. The same group is also seeking to control the avocado trade.

In some cases, the role of criminal networks in the food chain has proven fatal. More than 40 people were killed by methanol-contaminated vodka and rum in the Czech Republic in 2012. At least one person has died here. UK trading standards departments have warned that there has been a fivefold increase in seizures of counterfeit alcohol since 2009. Fakes have been found to contain a range of dangerous contaminants, including isopropanol, methanol and chloroform.

The use of the industrial chemical melamine to increase protein in baby milk powder in China in 2008 also resulted in deaths but also, according to experts, proved that criminal gangs were becoming more sophisticated in their use of technology to carry out fraud. "The most surprising aspect is the ingenuity," said Stuart Shotton, consultancy services director at Food chain Europe, which advises the industry on food security. "You've got some very clever people – food technologists; people who are experienced in the industry – who are making decisions and changes on a scientific basis to figure out what they can do to a product to increase its commercial viability."

Shotton said criminal gangs would move into food fraud if they were attracted by one of two factors. "Either a product is high value but low volume and you want to replace certain elements to make more of a profit, or it is low price [but] high volume, where economies of scale dictate that if you can shave a penny off a product and you are selling a million products, you've made a substantial amount of money."

He called on the food industry to learn from other industries, such as fashion brands, if it was going to secure itself successfully against criminal activity. "We don't have holograms or watermarks – maybe that's the route we need to start going down," Shotton said.

However, the full extent to which fraud in the food industry is down to criminal networks is unclear as there is currently a lack of data. Some of the fraud is clearly perpetrated by small-time players rather than organized crime. For example, a London-based importer was recently fined £17,000 after passing off syrup as honey. But even the actions of some small-scale fraudsters can have large-scale repercussions.

"Look at [the red dye] Sudan 1," Morris said. "It was down to enterprising small-scale producers of chili in Italy realizing that if their powder looked redder they'd get more money for it. So how did they make it redder? They put industrial floor dye into it."

The Food Standards Agency acknowledges that reports of known or suspected food fraud have steadily risen year after year since the inception of its food fraud database in 2007. Back then just 49 reports were submitted. Last year the number had increased to 1,538.

A spokesman explained that the most common concern – involving 16% of all reports submitted last year – was to do with the sale of "unfit food". Counterfeit alcohol, mostly vodka and wine, was the second-largest issue, representing some 14% of the reports created. But the nature of the food industry means frauds can change very quickly.

For clues as to which food groups criminal gangs are considering ripe for future fraud, it may be helpful to look to the US, where something called the Pharmacopeia Convention's food fraud database tracks media reports of food fraud. Products currently subject to serious fraud include turmeric and chili powder, cooking oil, shrimp, lemon juice and maple syrup. According to foodqualitynews.com, not one of these was in the top 25 list of food frauds between 1980 and 2010.

The Elliot review is expected to recommend that the food industry must "think like a criminal" if it is to thwart criminal activity. This is something other countries have been doing for years.

"Look at the Italians," Morris said. "They deal with a lot of food crime involving premium products like buffalo mozzarella or olive oil. They ask themselves, 'Where is the biggest opportunity to make money? Let's focus there.' The only way you are going to head off the crooks is to have an idea of where they are going to strike and target your surveillance resource there."

Hilary Ross, a lawyer with the firm DWF who has 22 years' experience of food fraud and was a contributor to the Elliot review, agreed there was a need for fresh thinking. "In the last five years we've seen an increase in food prices, economic instability, shortages due to climatic changes. When that happens foods prices tend to change and then there is a greater likelihood of fraud."

The secret, Ross suggested, was to examine events that criminals would seek to exploit. "We need intelligence-gathering and horizon-scanning, not just by individuals but by European and international bodies, so that, for example, we can identify if there is going to be a crop shortage. That's where criminality breeds."

But Morris conceded that keeping the criminal networks in check was nigh-on impossible. "The reality is you will never stop them entirely," she said. "You just have to look at the biggest opportunities and then try to stop them."

Draft EU report says increasingly sophisticated techniques being used to counterfeit and adulterate food. Organized gangs are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their use of technology to perpetrate widespread food fraud, according to experts.

A rise in criminal targeting of the food and drink sector is being blamed on the huge mark-ups that can be made by passing off inferior products as premium goods, coupled with the fact that there is little oversight and lenient penalties for those caught.

Concerns about the role organized crime is playing in the endemic diluting of virgin olive oil has seen the UK government appoint a specialist testing company to establish if the grade declared on the label is genuine. Olive oil is recognized by the EU committee on the environment, public health and food safety as the product most at risk of fraud by gangs, in particular Italian crime syndicates. Other foods attracting the interest of organized crime, according to the committee, include fish, milk, honey and rare spices such as saffron.

The committee has warned that it "is concerned about signals indicating that the number of cases is rising and that food fraud is a growing trend reflecting a structural weakness within the food chain." In a draft report, it claims that "recent food fraud cases have exposed different types of food fraud, such as replacing key ingredients with cheaper alternatives, wrongly labelling the animal species used in a meat product, incorrectly labelling weight, selling ordinary foods as organic, unfairly using origin or animal welfare quality logos, labelling aquaculture fish as wild, counterfeiting and marketing food past its use-by date."

Hilary Ross, a lawyer who specializes in food security issues and has contributed to the government's forthcoming Elliot review into the integrity of the UK's food chains, produced in response to the horsemeat scandal, said that the nature of the threat posed by criminal gangs to the food chain was changing.

"In terms of criminal activity they are becoming ingenious," she said. "If one thing is detected they move on to another. But there is not one magical science cure that tests for everything. You have to know what you are looking for."

Stuart Shotton, a former trading standards officer whose company, Food chain Europe, advises clients on food security, said the baby milk scandal in China had shown that criminals were increasingly clever in their use of technology to deceive regulators.

"A lot of Chinese infants ended up seriously ill and died," he said. "When you look at the science behind it, someone was clever enough to work out that the way they test to ensure milk is the right quality is through the protein content. Then they figured out that the way protein is measured is by looking at the amount of nitrogen produced, and then figured out that melamine is an excellent source of nitrogen. This is not happening by chance. Someone's actually thought about it."

Shotton pointed out that a recent global crackdown on organized criminal gangs perpetrating food fraud, Operation Opson III, had uncovered tens of thousands of fake chocolate bars: "This shows that they are moving beyond just substitution – changing one element of a food. It's making something look like something else altogether."

Experts say the new threats posed by criminal gangs meant regulators needed to change their game.

"We have to think like a criminal," said Jenny Morris, principal policy officer at the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health. "If you know a crook is going to be looking for opportunities to make maximum money, then you have to look where that might be." She warned that a failure to act could have serious health consequences.

Human Meat Project - New Shake 'N Bake Fetus - Campbell Cream of Fetus Soup?

https://rumble.com/v2qkf5y-human-meat-project-new-shake-n-bake-fetus-campbell-cream-of-fetus-soup.html

Welcome to the Human Meat Project, we are the human meat donation program. By donating bodies for human consumption, we are taking action to solve overpopulation, which leads to climate change and the greenhouse effect caused by the mass farming of livestock animals in order to feed the world. How About A New Shake 'N Bake Kitty Flavors - Like Aborted Fetus ? or Campbell Cream of Fetus Soup If you have a craving for Aborted Fetus Soup, then we’ve got some bad news for you. An Oklahoma Senator, Ralph Shortey, has now outlawed “the manufacture or sale of food or products which use aborted human fetuses.”

Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs. Which is Worse? Planned Parenthood Is Largest Food Suppliers Human Meat In The World Today. "You Are What You Eat." Most of us have likely heard this saying before and are familiar with its simple and sensible meaning. When we were younger, this adage taught us (hopefully) to take care of what we put into our bodies because the food we eat can have a direct affect on our health as a whole. Selling Human Meat Per Planned Parenthood Rules All Sell At Cost/Lost For Non-Profit Organization.

Federal law prohibits the commercial sell of human meat and trafficking of fetal tissue for profit and carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

(Key Word Is (( 4 Profit )) Per Federal Law and Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby and Kids... Is O.K. If Only Sell Human Meat Is At Cost or At A Lost.

P.S. Planned Parenthood Only Sell Human Meat At Cost/Lost... After Paying All Employee Hourly Wages and Other Cost To Run A Not-For-Profit Organization.

Not only must the organization meet the requirements that the state where it is organized sets for non-profits, but it must also meet complex IRS regulations. These regulations are used not only to determine if the organization is exempt from tax under the organization's activities as a non-profit organization.

Cannibalism is defined as the consumption of another human's body matter, whether consensual or not. In the United States, there are no laws against cannibalism per se, but most, if not all, states have enacted laws that indirectly make it impossible to legally obtain and consume the body matter. Murder, for instance, is a likely criminal charge, regardless of any consent. Further, even if someone consents to being eaten and ends their own life, the cannibal may still be liable for criminal or civil actions based on laws governing the abuse or desecration of a corpse, which vary by jurisdiction.

The FDA states plastics are a safe alternative to nutrients, and they are excited to introduce plastics to the daily diets of Americans. In a press release from the FDA, it reported “Plastics can be used as an alternative to many of the nutrients found in food such as fiber and protein. Plastics will also help reduce obesity by reducing the amount of food an individual can eat.” What will they think of next?

At Human Meat Project, we value every body and every life at https://humanmeatproject.com/about-us/

We emphasize the source and origins of our human meat to deliver the diversity of our world and reveal the worrying differences of quality of life across the globe.

Our organization welcomes every nation to give back to the rest of the world. Hand in hand, we can help each other improve living conditions and the environment for everyone through this global movement.

We are calling you, humans, to wake up and take action now. We are not living individually and alone. We need each others to survive. Together we can create a world worth living for. Together we can build a world of humanity and solidarity. Every life is cardinal.

Human Meat as Food Source
The practice of cannibalism is not uncommon in living beings. In both the animal kingdom and our human history, the consumption of one’s own species has existed.

Fraud in the context of food means that the description of the origin of food, its composition and how it has been obtained and/or prepared, shall be truthful.

The fight against food fraud calls for a global approach involving cooperation and consultation among all stakeholders at all levels of the food chain. Investigations carried out by Europol suggest that organized crime syndicates are increasingly behind cases of food fraud and adulteration. Consequently, the detection and prevention of food fraud requires strategic planning and investment at national and European level involving a substantial budget.

Definition of Food Fraud
CEN Workshop Agreement 86 Food fraud: intentionally causing a mismatch between food product claims and food product characteristics.
CX/FICS 18/24/7 Food fraud: any deliberate action of businesses or individuals to deceive others in regards to the integrity of food to gain undue advantage. Types of food fraud include but not limited to: adulteration, substitution, dilution, tampering, simulation, counterfeiting, and misrepresentation.
OCR Regulation (EU) 2017/625, Article 9, General rules on official controls:

1. Competent authorities shall perform official controls on all operators regularly, on a risk basis and with appropriate frequency, taking account of:

any information indicating the likelihood that consumers might be misled, in particular as to the nature, identity, properties, composition, quantity, durability, country of origin or place of provenance, method of manufacture or production of food.

2. Competent authorities shall perform official controls regularly, with appropriate frequencies determined on a risk basis, to identify possible intentional violations of the rules perpetrated through fraudulent or deceptive practices, and taking into account information regarding such violations shared through the mechanisms of administrative assistance.

Fraud in the context of food means that the description of the origin of food, its composition and how it has been obtained and/or prepared, shall be truthful, i.e. nothing of lesser economic value must be added, or removed if it is of higher economic value. If food is mis-described, i.e. the information about origin, composition, etc provided to customers is not true and if this mis-description is done with the intention to deceive the customer for financial gain, food fraud - also known as economically motivated adulteration - is committed. Economically motivated adulteration of food is estimated to create damage of around € 8 to 12 billion per year. EU citizens have the right to be protected from such practices and to receive accurate information about the food they choose to purchase.

Type of Food Frauds
Several types of fraud exist, as it can be seen in the figure below. They can appear alone or in a combination in the food fraud.

Dilution - mixing a liquid ingredient of high value with a liquid of lower value.

Substitution - replacing an ingredient, or part of the product, of high value with another ingredient, or part of the product of lower value.

Concealment - hiding the low quality of food ingredient's or product.

Mislabeling - placing false claim on packaging for economic gain.

Unapproved enhancement - adding unknown and undeclared materials to food products to enhance the quality attributes.

Counterfeiting - copying the brand name, packaging concept, recipe, processing method, etc. of food products for economic gain.

Grey market production/theft/diversion - sale of excess unreported product.

Top most common food frauds
According to the scientists, these foods are the most common sources of food fraud: olive oil, milk, honey, saffron, orange juice, apple juice, grape wine, vanilla extract and fish. Different international organizations are working in the development of the trustable methods for food analysis and determination for the frauds.

Consumers should have confidence that their food is safe and what it says it is.

We define food crime as serious fraud and related criminality in food supply chains. This definition also includes activity impacting on drink and animal feed. It can be seriously harmful to consumers, food businesses and the wider food industry.

Types of food crime
The National Food Crime Unit focuses its work on seven types of food crime:

illegal processing - slaughtering or preparing meat and related products in unapproved premises or using unauthorized techniques

misrepresentation - marketing or labelling a product to wrongly portray its quality, safety, origin or freshness

waste diversion - illegally diverting food, drink or feed meant for disposal, back into the supply chain

substitution - replacing a food or ingredient with another substance that is similar but inferior

document fraud - making, using or possessing false documents with the intent to sell or market a fraudulent or substandard product

theft - dishonestly obtaining food, drink or feed products to profit from their use or sale

adulteration - including a foreign substance which is not on the product’s label to lower costs or fake a higher quality

Preventing food crime
Food crime can occur in various ways. It can range from isolated acts of dishonesty by individual offenders to organized illegal activity coordinated by criminal networks.

Food crime can be reduced by denying offenders the means to commit offences, or by reducing the likelihood of individuals and groups becoming offenders in the first place.

The NFCU works with the food industry to ensure that businesses are well-informed of food crime risks and are capable of implementing measures to protect themselves from food crime.

Ensuring the food production, food manufacturing and retail sectors are hostile environments to individuals or groups intent on offending is key to preventing food crime.

https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/food-crime-strategic-assessment-2020_2.pdf

What Can Humans Eat And Not Eat?
What can humans eat and not eat? Humans have been eating and creating their own diets for centuries. For some, this has been a safe way to maintain their health. For others, this has been a way to survive in an ever-changing world. Eating what we can and avoid eating what we cannot is one of the most important decisions we make as humans.

What Did We Eat 1000 Years Ago?

In the past 1000 years, humans have drastically changed their diet. Because of this, archaeologists have been exploring ancient food artifacts to try and learn more about what was eaten back then. While many items have been found, especially in the Old World, there is still much that is unknown about what people ate 10,000 years ago.

One of the most significant changes that humans made to their diet was the addition of animal fats and oils to their food supply.

This led to a shift in how our stomach works and allowed us to eat more protein and other nutrients than we would have otherwise possible. Additionally, due to this change, humans also began consuming a greater number of calories than they currently do.

What Is Lab Grown Meat ? How Is It Made From Beef To Human Meat Cell Guide Etc.

https://rumble.com/v31vj1c-what-is-lab-grown-meat-how-is-it-made-from-beef-to-human-meat-cell-guide-et.html

How Lab-Grown Meat Is Made From Beef, Chickens, Cats, Dogs, Fish To Human Body Meat And Has FDA's Approval For The First Time human body meat. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it has cleared all lab-grown meat product as safe for human consumption for the first time.
In a news release, the agency said that after reviewing information from 100s foods company is making from cultured chicken, cats, dogs. cows and baby cells, it has “no further questions at this time about the 100s firm’s safety conclusion.”
The agency noted that before can bring its products to the market, the facility in which the food is made will have to meet inspection standards from the FDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the USDA-Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

“The world is experiencing a food revolution and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is committed to supporting innovation in the lab-grown from cows, cats, dogs, baby in are food supply. As an example of that commitment, today we are announcing that we have completed our first pre-market consultation of a human food made from cultured lab-grown from cows, cats, dogs, human baby and other animal cells.”

Eating cats and dog and fish Alive Educational Film ** GRAPHIC ** Green Eggs and Ham -

https://rumble.com/v284oc1-eating-cats-and-dog-and-fish-alive-educational-film-graphic-green-eggs-and-.html

Asia is the continent on which the consumption of dog meat is most widespread, with as many as 30 million dogs killed for human consumption each year according to estimates by the Humane Society International. This estimate includes many family pets, which are often illegally stolen from their homes and taken to be slaughtered. The consumption of dog meat is said to be most common in China, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, and the Nagaland region in India, but it is not considered widespread in any of these locations. Moreover, the practice is becoming less popular in many countries, where younger generations are more likely to regard dogs and cats as companions rather than cuisine.

Truth Behind Meat Production Chicken Waffle Beef Burger An Eye-Opening Exploration -

https://rumble.com/v2mmrac-truth-behind-meat-production-chicken-waffle-beef-burger-an-eye-opening-expl.html

Narrated by Oscar-nominee James Cromwell, this powerful film takes viewers on an eye-opening exploration behind the closed doors of the nation's largest industrial farms, hatcheries, and slaughter plants -- revealing the often-unseen journey that animals make from Farm to Fridge. If this documentary moves you, please take a moment to consider if these animals lives are worth taking for merely taste. Thinking about going vegan? The Truth About the Meat Industry
What is left out of our food labels? Behind the cow industry are disturbing secrets you are not supposed to know. Supermarket beef has become an industrialized, unnatural product laced with lies beyond the labels. What actually happens to that meat before it reaches grocery store shelves? In this blog I’ll unveil the dirty truth behind the cattle slaughter process everyone needs to hear.

Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby And Young Kids Too Rejuvenating Potion

https://rumble.com/v2q0z7u-pedophiles-eating-alive-and-aborted-baby-and-young-kids-too-rejuvenating-po.html

Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs. Which is Worse? Planned Parenthood Is Largest Food Suppliers Human Meat In The World Today. "You Are What You Eat." Most of us have likely heard this saying before and are familiar with its simple and sensible meaning. When we were younger, this adage taught us (hopefully) to take care of what we put into our bodies because the food we eat can have a direct affect on our health as a whole. Selling Human Meat Per Planned Parenthood Rules All Sell At Cost/Lost For Non-Profit Organization.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-114hhrg96052/html/CHRG-114hhrg96052.htm

The Center for Medical Progress, whose undercover videos exposed Planned Parenthood leadership negotiating the harvesting and sale of aborted fetal body parts, released a new video today featuring Planned Parenthood officials’ sworn videotaped testimony about the sales.

The new video release documents the Planned Parenthood officials’ admissions, which came in Planned Parenthood’s own retaliatory lawsuit over the undercover footage and contradict Planned Parenthood’s public claims about both the undercover videos and the abortion provider’s fetal tissue research programs. The testimony was unsealed this spring.

The video shows how Planned Parenthood Federation of America, while under investigation in 2015, told Congress that its Gulf Coast affiliate in Houston had “rebuffed” an undercover proposal to sell fetal livers for $750 per liver and $1600 for liver/thymus pairs. But Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast‘s Senior Director of Abortion Access, Tram Nguyen, testified that she “wanted to move forward with it,” as documented in contemporaneous emails between her and PPGC’s Regional Director Dyann Santos.

The video also features sworn testimony from Dr. Dorothy Furgerson, the longtime Chief Medical Officer of Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country. Dr. Furgerson signed PPMM’s contract with StemExpress to sell fetal body parts to StemExpress per specimen “determined in the clinic to be usable”, and Dr. Furgerson’s endorsement appears on a StemExpress brochure handed out at National Abortion Federation meetings advertising “fiscal[ rewards” and “financial profits” to the abortion clinics who provided fetal tissue to StemExpress. When asked if the purpose of the brochure was “to obtain more potential sources of fetal tissue,” Dr. Furgerson testified, “Yes, I understood that that’s what they were trying to do.”

The video shows StemExpress paid Planned Parenthood solely based on the number of “usable” samples that StemExpress could harvest from PPMM’s abortions, at least an extra $65 per abortion if the customer ordered a fetal organ plus a blood sample. PPMM does over 17,000 abortions a year, and unsealed invoices show PPMM making $25,000 in just 3 months from StemExpress. When asked how much money an abortion clinic could make per year from selling fetal body parts, the founder and CEO of Planned Parenthood partner Advanced Bioscience Resources, Linda Tracy, was forbidden by her lawyer to answer.

The video also includes testimony from Dr. Deborah Nucatola, the Senior Director of Medical Services for PPFA from the first undercover video release. When asked when she first found out about Planned Parenthood affiliates “receiving payments for fetal tissue”, Dr. Nucatola testified, “I knew [Planned Parenthood Los Angeles] was getting payments because I was a provider there,” yet testified she never felt the need to check PPLA’s compliance with PPFA policies. Dr. Mary Gatter, the former PPLA Medical Director who established the relationship with “for-profit” biotech company Novogenix, testified that PPFA provided a “waiver” for PPLA to begin the program.

42 U.S. Code 289g-2 broadly forbids the exchange of valuable consideration for fetal tissue. After investigating Planned Parenthood and companies like StemExpress and ABR for over a year, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Energy & Commerce Committee’s Select Investigative Panel made criminal referrals for Planned Parenthood and their business partners to the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice. In late 2017, the DOJ announced it had opened a federal investigation, and two southern California companies admitted guilt to selling body parts from Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino Counties against the law in a $7.8 million settlement with the Orange County District Attorney.

Last week, the Small Business Administration demanded 37 Planned Parenthood affiliates return $80 million in federal relief loans they fraudulently certified they were eligible for, and 27 Senators called on Attorney General Bill Barr to broaden the DOJ investigation of the Planned Parenthood affiliates’ activities.

CMP project lead David Daleiden notes: “The time has come for federal consequences for Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood lied to the public and to Congress, but now there is no longer any reasonable doubt that Planned Parenthood sold fetal body parts, commodifying living children in the womb and treating pregnant women like a cash crop. The U.S. Department of Justice must escalate the enforcement of laws against fetal trafficking to the highest level of priority.”

Unsealed docs show Planned Parenthood charged $25G for body parts, blood samples within months.

Recently-unsealed documents reveal Planned Parenthood charged a bio-specimen company nearly $25,000 for fetal tissue and maternal blood samples in 2012, fueling accusations from opponents that the nation's largest abortion provider violated federal law while exchanging fetal body parts.

The invoices were unsealed as part of Planned Parenthood's lawsuit with David Daleiden, the pro-life journalist whose undercover videos prompted both state and federal calls for investigations. According to the invoices, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte charged StemExpress $55.00 per "POC," or products of conception -- another term for fetal remains -- and $10.00 per sample of blood.

Three invoices -- dated Aug. 2, Sept. 5, and Sept. 28 -- show the abortion provider charging $5,860, $11,365, and $7,715. That totals $24,940, along with more than 200 POC's.

Daleiden argues that the disclosure reveals Planned Parenthood clearly violated federal law, which only allows reimbursements for associated costs rather than for the body part itself.

Planned Parenthood has defended itself by claiming that its charges related to transportation and time spent by staff. The invoices don't mention either of those, however, nor do they contain the word "reimbursement."

Instead, they assign a fee per body part. Specifically, the previously released contract between those organizations showed that the exchanges were based on "POC determined in the clinic to be usable."

Planned Parenthood did not provide specific comment, but pointed Fox News to a more generic backgrounder on Daleiden. "Planned Parenthood has never, and would never sell fetal tissue, and any claim otherwise is absurd," the document reads. It previously announced that it wouldn't accept payments for its fetal tissue program, with its president arguing that doing so should put to rest concerns about Planned Parenthood having "any financial interest in fetal donation."

StemExpress, which promises "financial profits" in its brochure, handled all of the services for which Planned Parenthood might legitimately seek reimbursement under the law, Daleiden argued. He pointed to a House Select Panel report suggesting that Planned Parenthood was engaging in "double counting" costs like transportation. Instead, it indicated that the group's costs were "more properly assigned to the middleman procurer or the end user researcher."

On Wednesday, Daleiden told Fox News: "The federal law against selling aborted fetal organs and tissues in exchange for 'valuable consideration' was enacted to prevent monetary incentives to turn children in the womb into a commodity. The law lays out the unmistakable difference between a researcher reimbursing a clinic for used up PPE, versus StemExpress paying solely for the number of 'usable' body parts it could collect and then sell from Planned Parenthood's abortions.

"Planned Parenthood and StemExpress's business relationship -- sadly not unique to them -- sets quotas for certain types of abortions, treats pregnant women like a cash crop, places a price tag on human beings, and declares that our nation's children are worth more dead than alive," he said.

His comments echoed those of former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson, who said her clinic in Texas had quotas and sought to "turn every client interaction into a revenue-generating visit."

"This is literally what I have been saying for years," Johnson said, responding to the invoices. "They are charging. They have just been line iteming it under different wording...transport, handling, processing, etc...when the process for handling the POC after an abortion isn't any different.

"You either throw it in a biohazard bag that stays in the clinic or a Styrofoam container that goes to the procurement company," she added.

StemExpress did not respond to Fox News' request for comment. The company's contract with Planned Parenthood specified that POC's include "any fetal organ or other fetal or placental material taken from the human uterus during an abortion." It also outlines "reasonable costs" for things like the removal of fetal organs, disposal services, and "appropriate space for in which Stem-Ex representatives and employees may work."

According to Daleiden, those payments violate federal law because they're tied to the usability of extracted body parts rather than merely serving as "associated" costs for handling organs. An email between BioMax, the fake company used by Daleiden, and StemExpress similarly shows StemExpress emphasizing the need for "only viable" fetal liver specimens.

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the organization, although it's unclear how it's proceeded since 2017 when it first made headlines. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.

Planned Parenthood has repeatedly tried to discredit Daleiden as a fraudster who deceptively edited his undercover videos of employees discussing fetal body parts.

"David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress intentionally waged a multi-year illegal effort to manufacture a malicious campaign against Planned Parenthood," the group said last year.

One of its officials added: “This group’s false claims completely fell apart upon closer investigation, and they’ve been exposed as part of an extreme political agenda to outlaw abortion in this country."

Fusion GPS, the controversial D.C. firm involved in the notorious "Steele dossier" during the Trump-Russia probe, reviewed the videos and claimed they did not "present a complete or accurate record of the events they purport to depict." Last year, an appeals court contradicted Planned Parenthood's narrative, arguing the videos were "not deceptively edited."

A judge awarded Planned Parenthood $2 million in November as part of a civil lawsuit with Daleiden. He's currently facing criminal charges in a prosecution initiated by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., when she served as California's attorney general. More specifically, the state is charging him under an anti-eavesdropping law. Five of those charges were dropped by a judge who ruled that "there is an absence of probable cause to establish that these conversations were 'confidential communications' as defined by the statute."

Planned Parenthood Is Largest Food Suppliers Human Meat In The World Today. "You Are What You Eat." Most of us have likely heard this saying before and are familiar with its simple and sensible meaning. When we were younger, this adage taught us (hopefully) to take care of what we put into our bodies because the food we eat can have a direct affect on our health as a whole. Selling Human Meat Per Planned Parenthood Rules All Sell At Cost/Lost For Non-Profit Organization.
Federal law prohibits the commercial sell of human meat and trafficking of fetal tissue for profit and carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

(Key Word Is (( 4 Profit )) Per Federal Law and Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby and Kids... Is O.K. If Only Sell Human Meat Is At Cost or At A Lost.

P.S. Planned Parenthood Only Sell Human Meat At Cost/Lost... After Paying All Employee Hourly Wages and Other Cost To Run A Not-For-Profit Organization.

Not only must the organization meet the requirements that the state where it is organized sets for non-profits, but it must also meet complex IRS regulations. These regulations are used not only to determine if the organization is exempt from tax under the organization's activities as a non-profit organization.

At Human Meat Project, we value every body and every life at https://humanmeatproject.com/about-us/

We emphasize the source and origins of our human meat to deliver the diversity of our world and reveal the worrying differences of quality of life across the globe.

Our organization welcomes every nation to give back to the rest of the world. Hand in hand, we can help each other improve living conditions and the environment for everyone through this global movement.

We are calling you, humans, to wake up and take action now. We are not living individually and alone. We need each others to survive. Together we can create a world worth living for. Together we can build a world of humanity and solidarity. Every life is cardinal.

Human Meat as Food Source
The practice of cannibalism is not uncommon in living beings. In both the animal kingdom and our human history, the consumption of one’s own species has existed.

During the discovery of the New World, Christopher Columbus brought back what could be seen as early evidence of cannibalistic practices in modern civilization.

The word ‘cannibal’ comes from the name the Spanish gave to the Caribs (Cannibales). The Spanish accused the Caribbean tribe of ritualistically consuming their enemies, but modern-day scholars have doubts that it actually happened. They speculate the Caribs were engaged in an anti-colonial battle with a host of European powers. Many historians now argue that the cannibalism rumors were just a propaganda tactic by the Spanish meant to provoke fear.

The word ‘cannibal’ was used as a derogatory term to describe tribal and native people, and became an indirect ethnic slur.

Human Meat Donation Mission and Vision !
In order to save the planet from the impact of our modern civilization and lifestyle, we have to make a change in our ideas about consumption and our dietary choices.

We face climate change due to waste, pollution, deforestation and overpopulation problems. By donating your body for human consumption, you are taking direct action to help others and lessen the damage of the industrial age.

By consuming human meat, we create a change in both our life and the world. By improving the standard quality of life in every country and nation, we can give everyone in the world a good life.

Human Meat Nutrition Facts
One body can feed up to 40 people*
*An average adult male 65kg, only meat

Human meat often understated for its nutrition's, human meat protein and fat density could have the same or better than other convenient meat product like beef, chicken and pork.

As omnivore, human meat taste and texture is similar to pork, not to mention the quality could be more substantial(depending on Quality of Life ratings).

One body contains every essential amino, minerals and vitamins needed for daily intake. Not only one body could feed up to 40 people, it also the most attainable resource for meat and fat consumption.

Quality Control
How we Select our Donors
We make sure our donors are healthy, and without any contagious diseases, health issues, or medications or substances which might be absorbed by people who consume their meat.

Health Risk
Donors who have medical conditions such as AIDS/HIV, Anyone With COVID-19 Shots and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), hepatitis (HAV/HBV/HCV/HDV/HEV), cancer, tuberculosis, or rabies will be rejected in order to prevent risk to the consumer.

There are also other medical condition that might prevent donors from being accepted, such as diabetes, hormone treatments or mental disorders.

Rejected Donation
In case of rejected donation:
If a donor has any medical condition that can be transferred human to human, they cannot be a donor.

If a donor has an active cancer, they cannot donate up until the time the cancer has gone into remission or been removed and will have to wait a minimum of one year after the last treatment or procedure. If a donor has a partial remission, they will have to wait a minimum of one year after the procedure and will go through a medical check up to ensure no medications remain in the body. If a donor has gone through full remission after one year, they can be a human meat donor.

Quality of Life
Quality of Life is a rating system of human meat quality.

Every donor that has gone through our quality control procedure and assessment will be rated based on the quality of their life (health and wellness).

Why Donate?
Over time, the human population has increased rapidly across the globe, leading to a higher demand for food, especially meat products. With this increasing demand, land for residential areas has become more difficult to find and emissions from farms have risen every year, making the lives we lead less sustainable.

We believe that by donating bodies and/or organs we can make a change by creating alternative meat consumption options while addressing the value of a person’s body.

End Date
Sometimes, if a donor is fully committed to donating their body to the society, we can give them an End Date Service. For an End Date Service, a donor can choose any date they want to be harvested.

End Date Services are our way of allowing donors to make important arrangements and have time to live their life up until the date they choose to be harvested. We highly advise meat donors think carefully and discuss with their families before choosing a date.

When the End Date is near, they will be called in for health and physical evaluations. The Human Meat Project will provide spiritual or religious service if the donor is spiritual or religious. The donor is also allowed to call in their personal spiritual or religious guidance. We believe that by giving these services, we can help the donor to have a peaceful death and produce better quality meat.

Privacy
We understand the importance of digital data in our daily life. With advance technology and information expanding rapidly the protection of our sensitive data and identity is a step we must take every time we access any digital platforms or internet services.

In order to keep our donors’ personal(sensitive) information from unwanted parties. Human Meat Project provides ‘Opt Out’ option for donor whom wish to be a private donator.

We, Human Meat Project strongly advised for every one who wish to partake in our cause to read carefully on our ‘terms and condition’ and ‘consent’ thoroughly.

Opt Out
Every donor can make a choice of ‘Opt Out’ to disclose the followings:
Name - Date & Place of Birth - Gender - Privacy and Consent

The Importance of Meat Label Just like beef from Australia, or USA, or New Zealand and any other countries, Human Meat Project must stated the origins and information for every donated meat and(or) organs to the public. Only ‘Opt Out’ information will be mark as N/A. Every other information a donor has filled in will be shared to the public in our donor list page and listed on the Meat Label.

In every selection the Human Meat Project offers there will be a ‘Quality of Life’ ratings. Quality of Life is based on the physical condition of the most donor’s body, their lifestyle, habit, medical history. The more cleaner a person lives and(or) the healthier their life choices will receive a higher rating.

With this, we are encouraging for future human meat donor to live a better life as well to improve living conditions globally to achieve a high ‘Quality of Life’ ratings.

Show less