Scares and Laughs: Best Zom-Com Since Shaun of the Dead

In this video, I'm sharing my first experience watching the horror classic "Dead Snow" (2009). Described as the best Zom-Com since Shaun of the Dead, I mean, Nazi zombies? Who would've thought that was even a thing? But I have to admit, the movie was fun. The jokes were hilarious, and the action was intense.

If you would like to support my channel, you can become a channel member by clicking the below link and gain access to such benefits such as:

- Early Access to all of my reactions
- Full Length Reactions
- Exclusive Reactions, currently Nocebo and The Pacific with more being added each week.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLRQgBGa-mtnGPnVU1SF1kA/join

A ski vacation turns horrific for a group of medical students, as they find themselves confronted by an unimaginable menace: Zombies from WW2.

This movie scores a 6.3/10 of IMDB and I personally would rate it a 7.5/10 as it was both scary with good comedic moments.

This movie was written by Tommy Wirkola and Stig Frode Henriksen.

This movie was directed by Tommy Wirkola.

This movie stars Jeppe Beck Laursen, Charlotte Frogner, Jenny Skavlan, Geir Vegar Hoel, Stig Frode Henriksen, Lasse Vadal and Ane Dahl Torp amongst others. Please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1278340/ for the full cast list.

This series was produced by Nor, Euforia, Yellow B***ard Productions, Film Camp, Storm Studios, Origo Kultur AS, Barentsfilm AS and Zwart Arbeid.

The copyright to the full original content is held by Miho Film. The copyright to this video is held by Thea and the Movies.

Legal and Copyright Contract: By clicking on, reviewing or making a copyright claim on this video you agree to all of the below terms and conditions and to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Ireland to resolve any copyright claims and/or disputes in relation to this video. You also agree that this contract will supersede any other agreement, past, present or future in relation to this video. Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of commentary, caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. As per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of commentary, quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video is for the purposes of commentary, quotation, criticism, review and parody and falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be required: - Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights - Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above - Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video - Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyrighted work utilised in the video - Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders will be reported to the police as attempted fraud! If you make a false copyright claim under law, a copyright claim that is not compatible with the law such as fair dealing or fair usage and/or a false claim by misrepresentation you agree that you will reimburse the owner of this video to the tune of EUR 250,000 and that your costs and claims will be limited to the amount of revenue earned by this video.