連體雙胞胎為何經常一個有感冒而另一個卻沒有？

這一對連體嬰雙胞胎分享同樣的血液和體循環，為何經常一個有感冒，而另一個卻沒有？

■瑪莎和達莎有關脊椎神經醫學的故事

“這位新媽媽被告知，她的雙胞胎嬰兒在出生後就去世了。然而，事實卻非如此：她們其實是被送往莫斯科附近的一間研究機構接受研究。這就是瑪莎和達莎的故事，她們是最受關注的人。因她們是有史以來極罕見，出生就是連體嬰雙胞胎。

由於雙胞胎的循環系統是相互連接的，因此她們共享彼此的血液。因此，進入這對雙胞胎其中之一的血液細菌或”病毒”(註一)很快就會在她孿生姐妹的血液中被發現。 然而令人驚訝的是，疾病對她們的影響卻大不同。

達莎近視、容易感冒、慣用右手。 瑪莎偶爾抽煙，體質較健康，血壓比姐姐高，視力良好，是左撇子。

這對雙胞胎不同的健康狀態呈現出一個謎。【為什麼當一個人患上麻疹等兒童疾病時，而另一個人卻沒有？】

當“聲稱可使人得麻疹的微生物”在他們兩人的身體裡、血液中被發現，那為什麼兩人都沒有得麻疹呢？顯然，“感染麻疹”應該另有其原因。這種現像在這對雙胞胎女孩身上反復出現（流感、感冒和其他兒童疾病都是兩人中的一人單獨經歷的）。 如果僅細菌就有能力引起傳染病，為什麼雙胞胎中的一個沒有疾病，而另一個卻生病了呢？

The Chiropractic Story of Masha and Dasha
"The new mother was told that her twin babies had died after birth. However, the truth was far different: they were sent to an institute near Moscow to be studied. This was to be the fate of Masha and Dasha, one of the most unusual sets of Siamese or conjoined twins ever born.
Because their circulatory systems are interconnected, the twins share each other's blood. Therefore, a bacterium or virus that enters one twin's bloodstream will soon be seen in the blood of her sister. Yet surprisingly, illness affects them differently. Dasha is short-sighted, prone to colds and right-handed. Masha smokes occasionally, has a healthier constitution, higher blood pressure than her sister, good eyesight and is left-handed.
The twins differing health patterns present a mystery. Why did one become ill with a childhood disease, like measles for example, while the other did not? The measles "bug" was in both of their bodies, in their collective bloodstream, so why didn't both get the measles? Evidently, there is more to "getting the measles" than having the measles "bug". This phenomenon was seen over and over again with the girls (flu, colds, and other childhood diseases were all experienced separately). If germs alone had the power to cause infectious diseases, why would one of the twins be disease-free while the other was ill?

■需要進一步研究麻疹和水痘的傳播性
致編輯：-我剛剛閱讀了《雜誌》（1919 年 10 月 4 日，第 1086 頁）中塞拉茲關於“人類對麻疹患者血液接種的不敏感性”文章的摘要（公報。約翰·霍普金斯醫院）。 30:257 [九月] 1919）。
值得注意的是，塞拉茲(Sellards)無法通過感染者的血液或鼻腔分泌物來產生這種高度傳染性疾病。 然而不久前，我也有過類似的水痘經歷（Am. J. Dis. Child. 16:34 [July] 1918）。 因此，我們面臨著兩種疾病——世界這一地區傳染性最強的兩種地方病——我們無法人為地在人與人之間傳播。 結果是最令人驚訝的......

NEED OF FURTHER RESEARCH ON THE TRANS- MISSIBILITY OF MEASLES AND VARICELLA
To the Editor:-I have just read the abstract in THE JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 1919, p. 1086) of Sellards' article on "The Insusceptibility of Man to Inoculation with Blood from Measles Patients" (Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 30:257 [Sept.] 1919).
It is remarkable that Sellards was unable to produce this highly infectious disease by means of the blood or the nasal secretion of infected individuals. Not long ago, however, I had a similar experience with varicella (Am. J. Dis. Child. 16:34 [July] 1918). Thus we are confronted with two diseases-the two most infectious of the endemic diseases in this part of the world-which we are unable to transmit artificially from man to man. The result was most surprising….

影片連結：
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwwF3_ZdSJ-MAVmcQQY4slZRTXjliQIP/view?fbclid=IwAR1SmwtlvWjaGiUr6cGraKCQoA9jgKRKdTDFRznZjJ2rGGa5OVAoDJ86iL0
以上影片摘自：
https://t.me/FE_Nederland

(註一)【病毒不存在】
在顯微鏡下，不論是細菌或是被稱為噬菌體(Bacteriophage)的觀察對象都可以清楚地成像與被記錄，它們的外型可以被拍攝，生命特徵可以被記錄與描述。但，”病毒”卻不能，它們既沒有攝影紀錄，也沒有完整的生命特徵可供記錄，甚至”它們能導致傳染病這點都沒有實驗可供證明。所有的”病毒圖片”，就像恐龍圖片一樣，只是揉和未證實的理論和藝術家的想像，或是把垂死破敗的生理組織充當是”病毒”，或是把外泌體(exosome)都做是”病毒”。
然而，【病毒並不存在】。

■Dr. Stefan Lanka 成功地分離出海水中的噬菌體(Bacteriophage)，但是他並沒有像其他的研究者那樣照著先前的假設蕭規曹隨地給出解釋，因為他發現這些所謂的噬菌體的顆粒並沒有以一種寄生在細胞裡獵食細菌為食的生態，這些被稱為噬菌體的顆粒呈孢子(spore-like)的形狀，乃是細菌的細胞處於一種特別的環境條件下所形成的。因此，稱這些顆粒為”噬菌體”(Bacteriophage)是不正確亦不科學的。既然它們不是”噬菌體”，也就不是如大家所宣稱其具有”病毒性”(viral)。

■“......這些噬菌體可以被拍攝下來，作為完整的顆粒被分離呈現出來，它們的所有成分都可以被生化測定和表徵的描述與紀錄。這是真實無可爭辯的......然而，這些拍攝和表徵的紀錄從未發生在聲稱的"病毒"上；不論是人類的病毒還是動植物的病毒，都不存在這樣的影像與紀錄，因為"病毒"是不存在。

The Virus Misconception, Part 1 Wissenschafftplus, 2020

"...these phages could be photographed, isolated as whole particles and all their components could be biochemically determined and characterised. This is real, and cannot be contested...this, however, has never happened with the alleged viruses of humans, animals and plants because these do not exist."
The Virus Misconception, Part 1 Wissenschafftplus, 2020

■英文版本：
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-1.pdf

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-2.pdf

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-3.pdf

■法文版本：
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-l-erreur-d-interpretation-virus-1.pdf

https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-l-erreur-d-interpretation-virus-2.pdf

■Dr. Rerum Naturalium, Stefan Lanka簡介：
於1963年9月27日生於西德的康士坦茲(Konstanz)，年輕時對生物很有興趣，特別對海洋生物和水的屬性，在1980年代加入德國軍隊，接受特別的定向測向無線電的偵察訓練，離開部隊後來進入康士坦茲大學(Konstanz University)從事他所熱愛的生物領域的研究。

Stefan Lanka: "Virus, It's Time To Go." English Subtitles.
https://odysee.com/@Hmanpro:e/Time_To_Go:b