Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer - Wrongfully Held in Prison, Shines a Light

Jul 03, 2023
Source: www.bitchute.com/video/567GbaLuIu38/

A quiet and sobering conversation covering whistleblower human rights campaigners Neelu Berry Chaudhari and Lee Cant's cases which have still not found justice in courts in the United Kingdom, and the work of Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer with the Equity Monarchy Trusts, currently wrongfully imprisoned, who has worked hard over two decades to bring cases of corruption and crime harming their lives, children, property to the notice of the King, Crown, Lord Bishops, Cabinet, and people.

Neelu describes the case of her baby niece who was harmed excessively in hospital before a premature death found to be homicide, mentioning other family members also subjected to grave crime and untoward death (covered in earlier Newsbreaks and Reports), and offering insight into the Indian judicial and media coverage of the story of the baby, while Lee speaks about violations of his rights involving local councils and police; both address the situation currently with Edward Ellis, who Lee and Neelu report has been falsely arrested, prosecuted, and incarcerated in a prison which is now known to be owned by a European company headquartered in France, Sopra Steria, rather than being government-owned, and which perhaps should be more closely looking into this case of wrongful arrest and letting Edward go, instead of lagging over providing him basic health care and dialysis for his kidney condition. The fraudulent one-year sentence, Neelu notes, is excessive and unwarranted in its entirety: a 70-year-old man with a kidney condition is indeed in great danger for his life when imprisoned especially in a space which is not focused on his medical care.

The great harm to whistleblowers in the UK is further subject for discussion as Lee and Neelu touch on other cases, including that of Julian Assange, both agree that the criminal justice system in the UK is fairly non-existent and what has happened to Edward is a grave travesty of justice, given the work that he has done and what he represents for the people. The judgment in Edward's case recently in fact is filled with false-claims, Lee notes, which include false-accusations of Edward recruiting people, evidencing a judicial refusal to accept his humanitarian work as legitimate, deriding the corruption victims he has helped instead as inauthentic and their cases as non-existent. Other incredible behavioral anomalies from judges via absurdities in restraint orders and relayed threats to people were aired. Looking at the language of the judgment in Edward's case, it does seem as if efforts have been made by judges to invert the facts and confabulate accusations in efforts to shut down the great effectiveness of the corruption remedy process which Edward has embarked upon. (More about this remedy process can be found at earlier articles at the ECC site—everydayconcerned.net; a Search with Edward's name should bring up earlier coverage.