Poke MI Back on Facebook

Fugitive Facebook May Have Finally Preps to Explain Violations of FACE Act and Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights

[FOB FREEDOM, June 29, 2023] Any station? Any station? Do you read? Over.

Reporting live from the world’s newest banana republic, . . .

It was a minute order by a federal court in the nation’s capital that received very little attention, while votes were being tallied for the Arlington Democrat primary elections, experimenting with rank choice voting for the first time since the legislature in Richmond had approved the new procedure, and while the fate of one fringe independent’s qualification for the ballot remained at stake, prompting two cases brought under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which shall determine whether election observers will be appointed to monitor the elections in the only former state of the Confederacy to deliver its Electoral College votes to Hillary Clinton in the contested 2016 election. And, while an attempt now to bring the White House under the jurisdiction of the courts for failure to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), on an issue that will ultimately determine both the origin and ownership of a novel coronavirus, attributed to more fatalities worldwide than Hitler in the Holocaust is certainly intriguing, most of the day spent by the first homeless candidate for the state legislature had been devoted to preparations to hold Facebook accountable for violations of the FACE Act, a case of first impression, after that social media platform had unlawfully blocked access to the entrance of a place of worship that had been designated as a safe place during a once in a lifetime pandemic, during which the former Virginia Governor had claimed he had heard reports regarding these hotbeds of infection that had been responsible for spreading the virus.

Major Mike Webb was not even a mention on July 15, 2021, when the Misinformation Dozen, including Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., had had their Facebook accounts disabled, under the direction of the White House, having been identified as being responsible for over 65% of the medical misinformation being spread about a novel coronavirus, but while attention focused upon these newsmakers, the disabling of not only a candidate for the Arlington Public School Board, but also a former biological warfare planner, expressly for “security reasons” went unnoticed, like what became a case of first impression, testing the protections of places of worship under the FACE Act, a challenge that now, after over two years, may finally see a day in court.

Not even after former Virginia Governor Ralph Northam had conceded that he had abused his authority, exacting restrictions upon places of worship, did any faith leaders, nor any of the Misinformation Dozen bring a case to court to seek redress under the FACE Act, but it looks like one pesky independent and litigation hobbyist may get the first crack and testing the resolve of the government to protect First Amendment freedoms and religious liberties, as commercial process servers go to the streets to haul the fugitive defendant, Meta Platforms, formerly Facebook, into a courtroom to explain their conduct.

“Well, Howard, you know it’s been a long battle, but at least now we may get the chance to hear the defense arguments from Mark Zuckerberg’s legal team on allegations that raise concerns about conspiracy with the government to breach that wall of separation, in derogation of both the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, in a conspiracy to violate rights, chargeable under 18 U.S.C. Sections 241 and 242 by the U.S. Attorney General. But for over two years we have found the federal courts acting as a gatekeeper for defendants, denying us a right to a day in court, but not without exacting harm to the rights of the defendants who had elected a dubious right to remain silent. We have already a retaliation argument, after Facebook had disabled the account of a political candidate, but now the apparent complicity of the courts that had, until now, refused to even issue a summons, to provide the defendants with a defense unworthy of credence: failure to receive notice, which had, on previous occasions, served as the pretext for denying even temporary injunctive relief. And, you know that evasion raises a reasonable inference of consciousness of guilt, which attorneys for Meta Platforms will have to argue should not apply, after running for two years. As Jimmy Kimmel had done for me, or so he said, I would only like for Facebook to have an opportunity to explain themselves, and even though they are my defendants, they still have rights, including a right to a day in court, and an opportunity to confront their accusers, and I promise I won’t bite. Why would Facebook be afraid of little old me?” explained Webb.

Note: grandiosity is a classic sign of bipolar disorder, and we don't want to hurt his feelings lest he go to “that place”, so familiar to Arlington Public School Board Member, Latina Cristina Torres-Diaz.

Chim-chimera. Chim-chimera. Chim-chim-cherry. A pandemic agent as lucky can be. Chim-chimera. Chim-chimera. Chim-chim--achoo. The luck'll rub off when I bump fists with you. Or blow me a kiss, and catch COVID-2.

Your elected representative is called your elected representative for a reason; and Martin Luther King and Jesus never got elected.

And let’s get ready to RUMBLE! https://rumble.com/vp2uk1-attorneys-need-not-apply-you-have-the-right-to-remain-silent.html.