Premium Only Content
TRI - 6/21/2023 - Reddit Rant - Lawyers Confused About Constitutional Law
Today’s silly article from Law & Crime draws parallels between a former intelligence analyst and a former president. Apparently this former intelligence analyst kept a bunch of secret documents at her home and was recently convicted of the same crime for which Trump was indicted. She was sentenced to four years for her crime.
The article explains that this is a closely parallel case and therefore a damaging precedent for Trump. Setting aside Trump saying something foolish and self-incriminating, these two cases are not at all parallel, because the people involved are not equivalent. The Constitution empowers the Executive branch with execution of the nation’s laws. The Executive branch is unique since this power is placed in a single individual. Since it’s not practical for one man to enforce all of the laws, the power of the chief executive is delegated to subordinate agencies and individuals. Those agencies act under the authority delegated to them from the chief executive.
Classification is a process developed for these agencies to ensure the security of sensitive government information. The power to restrict information through classification and declassification comes from the constitutional power granted to the President. The President has plenary power to classify and declassify information. To assert any other standard would be to attempt to hold the constitution source of legal authority as subordinate to an agency that derives its power from the very legal authority it is now trying to restrict.
Even if you make the argument that somehow the Legislative branch has authority to hem the President and his delegated agents in through passing legislation, I.e. the Espionage Act, you have only setup a conflict between two co-equal branches of government. Since neither Executive nor Legislative has a trump card over the other, should a conflict arise it is settled by the Supreme Court. Since the Supreme Court has set no precedent curtailing the President’s power to classify or declassify President Trump has a a strong constitutional argument that his actions were legally beyond the power of the legislature to curtail unless the Supreme Court says otherwise.
Sorry for the novel, this is an issue that forms a direct assault on the very fabric of our Constitutional Republic. Kind of important.
Like the video if you agree, comment if you don’t.
Follow TRI on other platforms for livestreams and conversation.
Twitter: @TRIDaily
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TRIDaily
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRationalIndependent/
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/rationalindependent
-
51:59
The Dan Bongino Show
3 hours agoDemocrat Donor Admits The Scary Truth (Ep. 2393) - 12/23/2024
399K804 -
2:32:15
Matt Kohrs
14 hours agoRumble CEO Chris Pavlovski Talks $775M Tether Partnership || The MK Show
74.9K17 -
28:23
Dave Portnoy
14 hours agoDavey Day Trader Presented by Kraken - December 23, 2024
90.4K31 -
59:29
BonginoReport
5 hours agoTrump, Murder Plots, and the Christmas Miracle: Evita + Jack Posobiec (Ep.110) - 12/23/2024
87.5K69 -
2:59:14
Wendy Bell Radio
7 hours agoNothing To See Here
82.9K46 -
2:12:18
TheDozenPodcast
23 hours agoIslam vs Christianity: Bob of Speakers' Corner
84.9K16 -
14:36
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
1 day agoRoger Stone Delivers Riveting Speech at Turning Point’s AMFEST 2024 | FULL SPEECH
108K25 -
18:59
Fit'n Fire
13 hours ago $6.41 earnedZenith ZF5 The Best MP5 Clone available
63.1K2 -
58:34
Rethinking the Dollar
22 hours agoTrump Faces 'Big Mess' Ahead | RTD News Update
49K5 -
5:35
Dermatologist Dr. Dustin Portela
22 hours ago $2.30 earnedUnboxing Neutrogena PR Box: Skincare Products and Surprises!
62.6K5