Now Women Can Divorce You Even If You Aren't Married - MGTOW

Sponsor Link Money Line Investments
https://www.moneylineinvestments.com/

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwbp9T-WS-I

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428
Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c
Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/
Sandman 2: https://www.youtube.com/@sandman2317
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SandmanMGTOW

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com

Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv

Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video isn't brought to you by any donations. If you want to send money for me to cover a topic then please do so at the paypal, subscribestar or bitcoin links below. Recently I was doing a coaching call and one of my clients mentioned that in Australia they have defacto marriage. Where if you live with a woman for 2 years then you're automatically considered married and she has a right to half your assets. In New Zealand it's 3 years and in Canada it's six months to a year of cohabitation and she can technically divorce you because according to the state you're technically married. Five to ten years ago I was doing a photography job for a bunch of family divorce court lawyers and judges and one of their judges was retiring so they were giving him a big sendoff. I got to talking with one of the lawyers and asked him if there was a slowdown considering that most people were living together and not getting married. He said they were going to change the laws over to common law couples living together having the same consequences as married couples and a year later they did in British Columbia where they were technically married after 1 year of co-habitation. Canada goes even further and there was a story about a guy in Toronto that was with a woman and not even living with her but simply because people thought they were married. He was forced to pay alimony by the courts even though they never married or lived together. But I look at this idea of defacto marriage as something that may actually benefit men. Men need to start practicing hypergamy. Pretending to have assets while dating women that actually have more than them. Living with a woman for two years and then leaving her and getting the courts involved to take her cash and prizes. If that becomes popular there might be films in the future with couples trying to get together that are both secretly broke thinking that the other one has money so they can spring a defacto divorce just over the two year mark. There might be a professional divorcer class. After each divorce you hide your assets in Bitcoin or monero and it looks like you have nothing on paper until you find your next victim. You would basically be another version of the Tinder Swindler. I found a few people discussing this issue and a post on the men's rights reddit that said this and I quote: "Is Ex-GF entitled to half of Ex-BF’s assets in New Zealand? If you live your gf for more than 3 years; She is entitled to half of his assets if the relationship breaks off. It’s called “de facto” relationship. There's a case in question : Isreal Adesanya (MMA fighter from Nigeria, and now NZ citizen). His ex gf is also NZ citizen. She has dragged him to courts for half of his assets. They do not have children nor they are married. Google/YouTube the story for more info. Beware; this is yet another example of why you should also avoid cohabitation. Australia = 2 years, New Zealand = 3 years, and Canada = 6 months. Are there any other countries you are aware of with similar rules/consequences for men ?" unquote. I'll try to answer that in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moneyline Investments:

10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.