Premium Only Content
Peace, National Security & the Defense Budget — ☢️ Truth Part 1 — Ronald Reagan 1983 * PITD
Peace, National Security and Defense Budget — Truth Part 1 — #RonaldReagan 1983 * PITD
Address to the Nation on Defense and National Security March 23, 1983
At the beginning of this year, I submitted to the Congress a #DefenseBudget which reflects my best judgment of the best understanding of the experts and specialists who advise me about what we and our allies must do to protect our people in the years ahead. That budget is much more than a long list of numbers, for behind all the numbers lies America's ability to prevent the greatest of human tragedies and preserve our free way of life in a sometimes dangerous world. It is part of a careful, long-term plan to make America strong again after too many years of neglect and mistakes. Our efforts to rebuild America's defenses and strengthen the peace began 2 years ago when we requested a major increase in the defense program. Since then, the amount of those increases we first proposed has been reduced by half, through improvements in management and procurement and other savings. The budget request that is now before the Congress has been trimmed to the limits of safety. Further deep cuts cannot be made without seriously endangering the security of the Nation. The choice is up to the men and women you've elected to the Congress, and that means the choice is up to you. Tonight, I want to explain to you what this defense debate is all about and why I'm convinced that the budget now before the Congress is necessary, responsible, and deserving of your support. And I want to offer hope for the future. But first, let me say what the defense debate is not about. It is not about spending arithmetic. I know that in the last few weeks you've been bombarded with numbers and percentages. Some say we need only a 5-percent increase in defense spending. The so-called alternate budget backed by liberals in the House of Representatives would lower the figure to 2 to 3 percent, cutting our defense spending by $163 billion over the next 5 years. The trouble with all these numbers is that they tell us little about the kind of defense program America needs or the benefits and security and freedom that our defense effort buys for us. What seems to have been lost in all this debate is the simple truth of how a defense budget is arrived at. It isn't done by deciding to spend a certain number of dollars. Those loud voices that are occasionally heard charging that the Government is trying to solve a security problem by throwing money at it are nothing more than noise based on ignorance. We start by considering what must be done to maintain peace and review all the possible threats against our security. Then a strategy for strengthening peace and defending against those threats must be agreed upon. And, finally, our defense establishment must be evaluated to see what is necessary to protect against any or all of the potential threats. The cost of achieving these ends is totaled up, and the result is the budget for national defense. There is no logical way that you can say, let's spend x billion dollars less. You can only say, which part of our defense measures do we believe we can do without and still have security against all contingencies? Anyone in the Congress who advocates a percentage or a specific dollar cut in defense spending should be made to say what part of our defenses he would eliminate, and he should be candid enough to acknowledge that his cuts mean cutting our commitments to allies or inviting greater risk or both. The defense policy of the United States is based on a simple premise: The United States does not start fights. We will never be an aggressor. We maintain our strength in order to deter and defend against aggression -- to preserve freedom and peace.
If you have any suggestions, questions or concerns please leave them below. Thanks for watching and make it an outstanding day! *** I am a proud American, blessed father, a staunch 2A activist and a Marine Corps Veteran that just happens to be 100% blind. This is a look at the Second Amendment, firearms, self Defense, Constitutionally protected rights, Liberty and Freedom from the perspective of a Visually Impaired, Blind American. #PatriotInTheDark If you like what you have seen here, please consider showing your support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PatriotInTheDark https://www.paypal.me/PatriotInTheDark Also check out our Spreadshirt Shop for Swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/patriot-in-the-dark Also find us here: https://odysee.com/$/invite/@PatriotInTheDark:0 https://gunstreamer.com/PatriotInTheDark https://twitter.com/patriot_itd https://www.instagram.com/patriot_in_the_dark/ PatriotInTheDark@gmail.com Disclaimer: No purchase necessary, must abide by all state and federal laws. Void where prohibited. No Puppies or sighted people were hurt during the filming of these videos.
-
5:09
Patriot In The Dark
1 year agoA Grateful Nation 🦃 Historic Thanksgiving Day Radio Address — Ronald Reagan 1988 * PITD
125 -
LIVE
Right Side Broadcasting Network
6 hours ago🎅 LIVE: Tracking Santa on Christmas Eve 2024 NORAD Santa Tracker 🎅
1,710 watching -
2:48
Steven Crowder
8 hours agoCROWDER CLASSICS: What’s This? | Nightmare Before Kwanzaa (Nightmare Before Christmas Parody)
167K12 -
LIVE
LFA TV
10 hours agoLFA TV CHRISTMAS EVE REPLAY
752 watching -
51:35
Dr Steve Turley
1 day ago $10.53 earnedROSEANNE BARR - Her Journey, TRUMP, and the MAGA GOLDEN AGE! [INTERVIEW]
24.9K34 -
57:38
The Tom Renz Show
3 hours agoMerry Christmas - The Tom Renz Show Christmas
32.3K4 -
2:59:10
Wendy Bell Radio
14 hours agoThe Bridge Too Far
127K187 -
1:03:45
Donald Trump Jr.
1 day agoHappy Festivus: Airing Our Grievances and Stopping The Swamp w/Sean Davis | TRIGGERED Ep.201
398K519 -
1:30:30
Game On!
17 hours ago $7.31 earnedTop 5 things you need to know for Sports Christmas!
54.6K3 -
1:58:10
Robert Gouveia
1 day agoMatt Gaetz REJECTS Report, Sues Committee; Luigi Fan Club Arrives; Biden Commutes; Festivus Waste
280K223