OMG! What Happened in The Strain S2E5?!

Hi all and welcome to Thea and The Movies where I react to the best of Film and TV.

If you would like to become a member of the channel community and get access to exclusive benefits such as:

• Early Access to my Reactions at least 24 hours before they appear on YouTube
• Full length reactions
• Bloopers and Outtakes
• Ability to select the movies or TV Series that I react too and much more, then please Join this channel to get access to these perks:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLRQgBGa-mtnGPnVU1SF1kA/join

NB: Please note that this movie contains strong themes of violence and those sensitive to such issues should take that into account that before viewing this reaction.

In this Video I react to The Strain Season 2 Episode 5, titled 'Quick and Painless', which is rated 7.6/10 on IMDB.

In this episode, Eph alters his appearance so he can leave the city, which makes Nora a reluctant parent for Zack. Meanwhile, Dutch and Nora negotiate with Justine to get Fet out of jail.

This episode was written by Guillermo Del Toro, Chuck Hogan and Liz Phang.
This episode was directed by J Miles Dale.
This episode stars Corey Stoll, David Bradley and Mia Maestro amongst others. For a full cast list, please visit, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4247342/?ref_=ttep_ep4

This movie was produced, based on information available to the author:
by FX Studios, Fox and Disney Corporation.

Based on the information available to the author, the Copyright is held by Fox Studios

Legal and Copyright Disclaimers: Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author.

The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221:

Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work.
In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement.

In addition, as per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche.

This video as a reaction video for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive

For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be requested:
- Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights

- Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above

- Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video

- Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video

Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders, e.g. distributors, will be reported to the police as attempted fraud!