Witness a First-Time Reaction to the Iconic Episode 3 of 'The Pacific'

Hi all and welcome to Thea and The Movies where I react to the best of Film and TV.

If you would like to support my channel, you can become a channel member by clicking the below link and gain access to such benefits such as:
- Early Access to all of my reactions
- Full Length Reactions
- Exclusive Reactions, currently Nocebo and The Pacific with more being added each week.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLRQgBGa-mtnGPnVU1SF1kA/join

If you cannot afford a monthly membership, please consider a once off donation to a video you particularly liked by using the Super Thanks function or just like and share the video :)

Channel membership subs and donations go towards the cost of purchasing the Movies and TV shows I react too as well as the many hours I have to put into editing, lighting, equipment and doing the reactions so all support, no matter how small, is welcome. Thanks in advance for your generosity.

NB: Please note that this series contains strong themes of violence and those sensitive to such issues should take that into account that before viewing this reaction.

In this Video, I react to the third episode of the Mini Series ‘The Pacific’ (2010). This episode is titled ‘Melbourne’.

After arduous months in Guadalcanal, exhausted marines are given rest and recreation in Melbourne, where they find the girls friendly and the beer cold.

This episode scores a 7.4/10 on IMDB and I personally feel that's an appropriate score

This episode was written by George Pelecanos, Michelle Ashford and Robert Leckie.

This episode was directed by Jeremy Podeswa.

This episode stars James Badge Dale, Joseph Mazzello and Jon Seda amongst others. Please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1576603/?ref_=ttep_ep3 for the full cast list.

This series was produced by Tom Hanks, Stephen Spielberg, Gary Goetzman, HBO Miniseries, Playtone, DreamWorks, Seven Network and Sky Movies

The copyright is held by HBO.

Legal and Copyright Disclaimers: Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author.

The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221:

Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work.
In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement.

As per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche.

This video is for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody and falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive
For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be requested:

- Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights
- Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above
- Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video
- Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video
- Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law

Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders will be reported to the police as attempted fraud!