Unbelievable True Story: The Secret Behind 13 Hours in Benghazi (Part 1)

Hi all and welcome to Thea and The Movies where I react to the best of Film and TV.

In this Video, I react to the Movie ’13 Hours – The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2016)’ which scores a 7.3/10 on IMDB and tells the true story behind the events that led to the death of the American Ambassador in Benghazi, Libya, 2012.
In an unofficial CIA base in Benghazi, a group of ex-military contractors are providing security. In the aftermath of Gaddafi's downfall, a power vacuum exists and the climate is volatile. Military weapons are freely available.
The US Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens (RIP), makes a visit to the area, staying in a compound near the CIA base. On the night of 11 September, 2012, the Ambassador's compound is attacked by hordes of heavily armed locals; the only forces willing and able to defend it are six CIA contractors.
Personally, I would rate this movie higher than the 7.3 it scores on IMDB and would put it at an 8.5.
This movie was written by Chuck Hogan and Mitchell Zuckoff.
This movie was directed by Michael Bay.
This movie stars John Krasinski, Pablo Schrieber and James Badge Dale amongst others.
This movie was produced by Paramount Pictures.
All GIFs used in this video were sourced from www.giphy.com

Credit for the GIFs used in this video, in no particular order, goes to the following:
- Southpark
- Parks and Recreations
- The Roku Channel
- Hrithik Roshan
- Buzzfeed
- Sonic the Hedgehog
- Giphy Dating
- Halo
- Servideo
- Storyful

Legal and Copyright Disclaimers: Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In addition, as per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video as a reaction video for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be requested: - Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights - Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above - Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video - Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video - Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders, e.g. distributors, will be reported to the police as attempted fraud!