The Third Truth About 9/11 by Dimitri Khalezov - Part 21 of 26

Part 21. The discussion moves on again to the point that it was hard to believe that the
incredibly thick double-walled steel supporting columns of the WTC suddenly turned
into complete microscopic dust that allowed the Towers to collapse at freefall speed.
However, it is even harder to believe that such steel columns could have been penetrated
by aluminum planes which completely disappeared inside. This is followed by a famous
clip from Evan Fairbanks’ video that shows from beneath the South Tower how a plane
approaches and penetrates it and how a man caught into the frame reacted on that. It is
repeated twice and it is clear that the man reacts neither to the sound of the plane on its
approach, nor to the sound of an aluminum plane cutting through the WTC steel
perimeters. It is very obvious that the man reacts only on hearing an explosion above -
i.e. his reaction coincides with the appearance of those trade-mark orange Hollywood-
style fireballs that suddenly burst from the South Tower. It is followed by another famous
video clip - an interview with the WTC on-site construction manager Frank Albert de
Martini. In this interview, recorded in January, 2001, de Martini claims that the WTC was
designed to sustain the impact of the fully loaded largest commercial airliner at the time -
the Boeing 707 (which was even bigger in size than the Boeing 767 that allegedly toppled
the Twin Towers on 9/11). De Martini explains that the plane can not penetrate the
intense [steel] grid of the Towers’ perimeters. Another contemporary 9/11 clip by CNN is
shown - one of the earliest. It shows how Fox reporter Dick Oliver on the street tries to
get some information about the first explosion in the North Tower from several passers-
by. A woman stops and talks to him. She says that she witnessed the explosion around the
80 th floor and a large section of the building was blown out. On Oliver’s question if it was
hit by something, she firmly answers “no”. It was inside, she repeats it twice in an
affirmative manner - it was inside, because everything was coming out. Another famous
9/11 video clip is shown. In it soon after the North Tower’s collapse an angry passer-by
interrupts a staged interview by Fox TV channel. The passer-by says angrily to the Fox
reporter that it was not the second plane, but a bomb and he repeated it at least three
times - he saw the explosion with his eyes and it was not a plane, but a bomb. Then
another video clip is inserted that shows an excerpt of George W. Bush’s 15 September
2006 Rose Garden Speech. In this speech Bush, who apparently talks to some security
officials, refers to certain “valuable information” in regard to “plane attacks on buildings
inside the US”. According to Bush the attacks were designed in a manner to ensure that
“explosives went off’ at points high enough to prevent people trapped above from
escaping. It appears from this clip that Bush is certain that the WTC Towers were wired
with explosives designed to imitate “planes” impacts and he talks about it as of a matter
of fact. The discussion then comes back to the “planes”. The interviewer refers to the fact
that in his book Khalezov made claims that there were no planes and that the actual
planes were shot down by the US Government and asks Khalezov to clarify that claim of
his. Khalezov answers that he believes that the two planes that were supposed to have hit
the Twin Towers were stolen, they were empty and they were made to sink somewhere in
the Atlantic Ocean to hide evidence, while the planes’ images were used for digital
manipulation with videos showing their alleged impacts. Another famous CNN video clip
(actually not CNN’s own, but by “courtesy WABS”) is inserted here that purports to
show the second “plane” hitting the South Tower. In that clip there are at least two clear
signs of digital manipulation, which Khalezov points out. One of them that in the middle
of the impact scene there are some completely black frames. The second one is that the
word “Live” which before the impact was on a red banner suddenly appears on a blue
banner, instead, after the “plane’s” impact. Moreover, Khalezov suggests listening
carefully to the discussion between the two CNN reporters which is the sound-track of
the above clip. The two CNN reporters, who apparently saw things live, but did not see
that “courtesy WABS” clip talked only about an explosion in the South Tower and
neither of them mentions any “plane” or even hints that the Tower might have been hit by
something. This parts ends with the ABC clip that shows the second plane hitting the
South Tower, however the ABC’s Dan Dahler who is on the WTC spot clearly states that
he did not see any plane, it was an explosion.

Here is a link to a zip-file with Dimitri's deposition in book-form and important related files: https://archive.org/download/the-third-truth-about-9-11-interview/911thology.zip

Part 22 of 26: https://rumble.com/v2o20we-the-third-truth-about-911-part-22-of-26.html