The Third Truth About 9/11 by Dimitri Khalezov - Part 11 of 26

Part 11. Continuation of the discussion on the distribution of “damaged” and “crushed”
zones along the Twin Towers’ bodies started in the previous part, which is followed by
several examples of the 9/11 footage that show the way the Towers actually collapsed.
The pattern of their collapse perfectly matches Khalezov’s claims in regard to the
distribution of “damaged” and “crushed” zones. Asked if it could have been anything
other than a nuclear explosion, Khalezov answers that there is no other known physical
process capable of reducing the thick steel columns of the Twin Towers into complete
microscopic dust. Only a nuclear explosion could do that. Photos of several WTC
columns are shown where incredibly thick double-walled cross-sections are clearly
visible showing that each wall is comparable with a tank’s armor because of its thickness.
It is followed by 9/11 photos showing steel dust in detail during the South Tower’s
collapse and also microscopic steel dust that covers oranges and plums of some street
vendor near the WTC area. Asked about claims of so-called floor-by-floor “pancake”
collapse, Khalezov offers to review footage of the South Tower’s collapse - noticing that
the Tower’s top falling downwards does not meet any resistance whatsoever which would
supposedly have been offered by the remnants of alleged “floors”. Moreover, no “floors”
whatsoever are visible in that footage. All that could be seen is that the South Tower’s
top suddenly began to move downwards at near freefall speed as if under it there were not
any remnants of incredibly thick steel structures, but only air alone. The footage clearly
shows complete microscopic dust which offers no more resistance than would air and it
does not reveal any larger debris, not to say alleged “remnants of the floors” which
presumably would be the corner stone of the “pancake collapse” theory. This is followed
by a contemporary CNN clip that showed the South Tower’s collapse. It is requested to
note that only 4 minutes has passed since its collapse, but the Sears Tower in Chicago has
already been ordered to evacuate by 10.04 AM EST as appears from CNN’s text on the
lower part of the screen. When repeating the South Tower’s collapse footage, the CNN
text reads: “MOMENTS AGO BREAKING NEWS THIRD EXPLOSION SHATTERS
WORLD TRADE CENTER IN NEW YORK. CNN”. The interviewer asks - does it
mean that it was a nuclear device? Khalezov’s reply: of course it was a nuclear device,
otherwise, why would they call the place “ground zero”? A quotation is displayed from
The American Heritage Desk Dictionary 1981 edition, stating that “ground zero” is “the
place on the earth directly at, below, or above the explosion of a nuclear bomb” followed
by the Dictionary’s ISBN number. Khalezov says that many people have forgotten what
“ground zero” used to mean before 9/11 and it is a good time to remind them. He takes an
enormous volume of the Webster’s unabridged pre 9/11 dictionary, perhaps, three times
the size of a volume of the Encyclopedia Britannica, and opens it on its “ground” page.
The only “ground zero” definition from the dictionary is displayed and read. “Ground
zero” is “the point on the surface of the earth or water directly below, directly above, or
at which an atomic or hydrogen bomb explodes”. Khalezov jokes - does it say ground
zero is a place of pancake collapse? Asked what happened with the “ground zero”
definition after 9/11, he answers that after that the US Government was so embarrassed
that the WTC demolition grounds were called by such a revealing name, that it needed to
change its legal definition in all future dictionaries; otherwise, people might doubt it. He
shows another example. He takes two nearly identical Longman Advanced American
Dictionaries of two different additions - a pre-9/11 one and a post-9/11 one - and offers
to compare “ground zero” definitions in them. In the first edition “ground zero” has a
single meaning (as in all other pre-9/11 dictionaries): “the place where a NUCLEAR
bomb explodes, where the most severe damage happens”. In the second, post-9/11 edition
the definition is enlarged: 1. “the place where a large bomb explodes, where the most
severe damage happens” and 2. “Ground Zero the place in New York City where the
World Trade Center buildings were destroyed by TERRORISTS on September 11,
2001”. In the first definition the word “NUCLEAR” in capital letters is changed to the
word “large”, while the rest is left the same. Khalezov claims that the US Government
changed the definition of “ground zero” in all other dictionaries as well, joking that the
very English language became one of the victims of 9/11. Discussion moves further to
the point whether the dust the WTC was reduced to was radioactive or not. Khalezov says
that many people mistakenly think that because the WTC was destroyed by nuclear
explosions the dust should be radioactive in the same sense as “radioactive dust” during
an atmospheric nuclear explosion. It is wrong to think like this, because during an
atmospheric nuclear explosion dust becomes radioactive because it is being sucked from
the earth’s surface into a mushroom cloud by high temperatures inside the cloud and it
becomes radioactive while there. When the cloud cools down, the radioactive dust falls
down causing radioactive contamination. However, in the case of the WTC demolition all
radioactive materials were concentrated inside the cavity and dust had nothing to do with
any radioactivity, therefore it should not be radioactive. Nonetheless, it will be harmful,
because it is a microscopic material which will cause mechanical damage when inhaled.
What was really radioactive in the case of the WTC was vapor, not dust. Footage of
ground zero is shown where vapor is ascending in huge quantities from underground.

Here is a link to a zip-file with Dimitri's deposition in book-form and important related files: https://archive.org/download/the-third-truth-about-9-11-interview/911thology.zip

Part 12: https://rumble.com/v2o108i-the-third-truth-about-911-part-12-of-26.html