Premium Only Content
Thoughs about Physics and the String Theory
I had some thoughts about the relation of metaphysics, physics and quantum physics. My work is about metaphysics. It is not really about physics or quantum physics, but about universal relations between archetypal concepts. The law which I describe is not a physical law.
It is an even higher law of existence, which is superior to all possible realities, which can function according to all possible physical laws. It is a metaphysical law. Physics describes only our reality, but metaphysics stands above everything.
In the three principles, different concepts can be found. Past, present and future or static, organic and chaotic structures.
I think that if one would solve the puzzle of chemistry and would transfer the physical particles to a simpler principle, then this order would make a lot of sense.
Metaphysics is objective, works with equal values and describes universal relations of these values. There, all possible values are viewed as a single unit. From total negativity to total positivity. All states, no matter if logical or illogical, and also no matter how one evaluates them oneself, stand neutrally next to each other. Then one questions how these possibilities stand in relation to each other. That is why metaphysics is objective, because it works with objective values and objective laws. Of course, there is no objective individual value, but when all values are side by side, there is no more variability. The degree to which something manifests itself in this spectrum is variable. But the sum of all possibilities is fixed and unchangeable.
As I said, I am not a physicist and know only a few documentaries about physics and quantum physics. But what is described in quantum physics sounds to me as if there would be no objectivity in detail. There events happen which seem to be detached from all laws. So variable in value and in the law.
Physics is relative. It describes variable values and objective laws. I have asked myself if the relativity of the time is connected with the calculations.
In my analysis, I assume that the things in the nature cannot be controlled centrally, but must happen side by side.
If I understood Einstein's theory of relativity correctly, it means that the faster something moves, or the more mass something has, the slower it moves in time. This could be because the more complicated a calculation is, the longer it takes to calculate it. I notice this when I develop games. The more calculations, the slower the game runs. That's why it's very important in game development to keep the code as simple as possible and not include any unnecessary complicated calculation steps.
If in reality everything happens and is calculated side by side, places with more energy would move slower in time, because they need longer to be calculated. Where there is less energy and particles, on the other hand, it would take less time to calculate and so move faster in time.
I have also heard something about the string theory. This says that particles are actually multidimensional strings of energy, of which we can see only one degree.
Would the string also be considered as a spectrum from order to chaos. Or fixed to volatile. Or low and fast, then we could possibly solve the double slit paradox with it. So the particle/wave paradox, would be then no paradox at all, but only a degree shift of an individual string, which is very spread out on one side and moves thereby like a wave and affects several positions at the same time, and is limited on the other side to only one small point. I don't know why the shift takes place and what triggers it. Maybe the reality is easier to calculate if it works only roughly with probabilities and collapses into an individual event only if the information is requested by observation.
You may have seen the different patterns that are created when a metal plate on which sand is lying is vibrated with acoustic frequencies. Maybe the pattern of different particles or degrees of a string could be hidden there. If I would not be so poor and without a proper degree, with no more resources than my mind and laptop, I would try to measure & arrange the patterns that arise at different frequencies from low to high. Then I would try to transfer these patterns into a 3D or 4D model and connect them to see if a larger pattern emerges from the sum of all individual patterns and frequencies. Maybe the form of a 4d string and its octaves can be found in it. but i don’t know. I can't verify that and I think universities are busy hiring and paying people to think up reasons why it would be ok to threaten innocent people to force them to take pharmaceutical products against their will...
-
34:36
Stephen Gardner
3 hours ago🔥Trump makes HUGE THREAT...Voters are loving it!
27K66 -
1:53:58
Kim Iversen
6 hours agoDems React To Trump Landslide. Will They Learn Or Get Worse?
78.7K20 -
1:51:02
Fresh and Fit
6 hours agoTop 3 Reasons Why Your Girl Shouldn’t Lead In A Relationship!
59.1K2 -
56:23
LFA TV
19 hours agoToo Big to Rig | Trumpet Daily 11.6.24 9PM EST
42.7K2 -
49:54
PMG
8 hours ago $0.08 earned"Hannah Faulkner and Scotty Saks | MSM INSIDER TURNED WHISTLEBLOWER"
25.6K3 -
1:43:46
Glenn Greenwald
6 hours agoTrump’s Landslide Win: Our Analysis, With Journalist Lee Fang | SYSTEM UPDATE #363
154K101 -
2:25:44
WeAreChange
6 hours agoKamala OFFICIALLY Concedes! Peace And Prosperity Or PREPARE Now?
128K19 -
4:07:49
Robert Gouveia
11 hours agoElection 2024 Latest News: Trump Margin GROWS; Kamala Delays; Lefty Reaction; House; Senate
200K50 -
3:03:45
SNEAKO
8 hours agoONE MINUTE PODCAST - ONE DAY AFTER TRUMP WON!
129K9 -
1:01:45
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
4 hours agoBreaking Down President Trump’s Historic 2024 Election Victory | The StoneZONE
36.8K3